World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5990 5567 2855 2607 114 5565

Claudia Flowers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Claudia Flowers between 1993 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Claudia Flowers published across 31 years, from 1993 to 2023, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2001. 4 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2001. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications
1993 2023

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Claudia Flowers: publications per year, 1993 to 2023
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 3
1999 4
2000 8
2001 9
2002 6
2003 7
2004 7
2005 5
2006 8
2007 3
2008 5
2009 3
2010 6
2011 4
2012 3
2013 2
2014 3
2015 3
2016 3
2017 2
2018 3
2019 2
2020 3
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
Total 115
Download as CSV

Claudia Flowers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Flowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 114 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 114
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Claudia Flowers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Flowers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Claudia Flowers is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with a notable focus on Education, Social Psychology, Safety Research, Clinical Psychology, and Computer Science Applications.

Their scholarly work broadly covers topics such as Counseling Practices and Supervision, Online and Blended Learning, Early Childhood Education and Development, Teacher Education and Leadership Studies, Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion, Family and Disability Support Research, and Disability Education and Employment.

Flowers has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Counseling Research and Practice
  • International Journal of Play Therapy
  • Online Learning
  • The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
  • The Professional Counselor

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Claudia Flowers are:

  • Examining Student Perception of Readiness for Online Learning: Importance and Confidence, 2020, Online Learning
  • Design Matters: Development and Validation of the Online Course Design Elements (OCDE) Instrument, 2021, The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
  • Impact of child-teacher relationship training on teacher attitudes and classroom behaviors, 2020, International Journal of Play Therapy
  • Child-teacher relationship training exclusively in the classroom: Impact on teacher attitudes and behaviors, 2021, International Journal of Play Therapy
  • A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the School Counselor Knowledge and Skills Survey for Multi-Tiered Systems of Support, 2020, The Professional Counselor

Their frequent co-authors include Sejal Parikh Foxx, Jacob Olsen, Kaeleigh Hayakawa, Florence Martin, and Phyllis Post.

Best Publications

  • Research and Theory Religion and Spirituality in Coping With Stress

    Stephanie Graham;Susan Furr;Claudia Flowers;Mary Thomas Burke

  • Student Evaluation of College Teaching: A Practice in Search of Principles.

    Bob Algozzine;John Gretes;Claudia Flowers;Lisa Howley

  • Literacy for Students With Severe Developmental Disabilities What Should We Teach and What Should We Hope to Achieve

    Diane Browder;Susan Gibbs;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Ginevra R. Courtade

  • Principals' Knowledge of Fundamental and Current Issues in Special Education

    Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Diane M. Browder;Claudia Flowers;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • The Alignment of Alternate Assessment Content with Academic and Functional Curricula

    Diane Browder;Claudia Flowers;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Meagan Karvonen

  • Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Early Literacy Program for Students with Significant Developmental Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Ginevra Courtade;Susan L. Gibbs

  • A Structural and Discriminant Analysis of the Work Addiction Risk Test

    Claudia P. Flowers;Bryan Robinson

  • Creating Access to the General Curriculum With Links to Grade-Level Content for Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities An Explication of the Concept

    Diane M. Browder;Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Claudia Flowers;Robert J. Rickelman

  • Teaching Mathematics and Science Standards to Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Katherine Trela;Ginevra R. Courtade;Bree A. Jimenez

  • Work Stress and Marriage: A Theoretical Model Examining the Relationship Between Workaholism and Marital Cohesion

    Bryan E. Robinson;Claudia Flowers;Jane Carroll

  • A Description and Demonstration of the Polytomous DFIT Framework.

    Claudia P. Flowers;T. C. Oshima;Nambury S. Raju

  • An Evaluation of a Multicomponent Early Literacy Program for Students With Severe Developmental Disabilities

    Diane Browder;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Claudia Flowers;Joshua Baker

  • The Effects of Self-Directed IEP on Student Participation in IEP Meetings:

    Sarah K. Allen;Anne C. Smith;David W. Test;Claudia Flowers

  • What We Know and Need to Know about Alternate Assessment

    Dianne M. Browder;Fred Spooner;Robert Algozzine;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • Marital Estrangement, Positive Affect, and Locus of Control among Spouses of Workaholics and Spouses of Nonworkaholics: A National Study.

    Bryan E. Robinson;Jane J. Carroll;Claudia Flowers

  • Teachers' Perceptions of Alternate Assessments

    Claudia Flowers;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Diane Browder;Fred Spooner

  • A Content Analysis of the Curricular Philosophies Reflected in States' Alternate Assessment Performance Indicators:

    Diane Browder;Fred Spooner;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Claudia Flowers

  • Reversing Education Majors' Arithmetic Misconceptions With Short-Term Instruction Using Manipulatives

    Michael Green;John A. Piel;Claudia Flowers

  • Comparing social desirability responding on world wide web and paper-administered surveys

    Dawson R. Hancock;Claudia P. Flowers

Frequent Co-Authors

Diane M. Browder
Diane M. Browder University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Fred Spooner
Fred Spooner University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Bob Algozzine
Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte
David W. Test
David W. Test University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California
Marjorie Kleinman
Marjorie Kleinman Columbia University
Leo S. Morales
Leo S. Morales University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens numerous career opportunities in fields like social work, behavioral analysis, and psychology. Flexibility and accessibility make these programs ideal for working adults or those needing to balance personal commitments with their studies.

For those interested in social work, online msw programs offer an affordable and flexible path to a rewarding career supporting individuals and communities. If your focus is on helping people with behavioral challenges, consider accredited bcba school online options that can help you qualify as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Interested in finishing your degree faster? fastest msw program tracks let you complete coursework on an intensive timeline, minimizing your time to graduation. Similarly, if you wish to enter the psychology field quickly, accelerated bachelor's degree psychology programs are available for motivated learners.

Each pathway offers unique benefits, so review the options to find the best fit for your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Flowers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles