World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
12623
World Ranking
1126
National Ranking
520

Diane M. Browder publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Browder sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 168 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Diane M. Browder D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diane M. Browder sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Diane M. Browder is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences, with a particular focus on Education and Safety Research.

Their efforts have concentrated on topics related to Education Systems and Policy as well as Disability Education and Employment. These topics reflect key areas in which Diane M. Browder has contributed scholarly work, emphasizing educational frameworks and accessibility in employment contexts.

Collaborations are an integral part of their research activity, with frequent co-authors including Shawnee Wakeman and Claudia Flowers. These partnerships indicate engagement with peers who share interests in related educational and social science fields.

  • Education Systems and Policy
  • Disability Education and Employment

  • Shawnee Wakeman
  • Claudia Flowers

Best Publications

  • Effects of Interventions to Promote Self-Determination for Individuals With Disabilities:

    Bob Algozzine;Diane Browder;Meagan Karvonen;David W. Test

  • Research on Reading Instruction for Individuals with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Fred Spooner;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • Effects of Training in Universal Design for Learning on Lesson Plan Development

    Fred Spooner;Joshua N. Baker;Amber A. Harris;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • A Meta-Analysis on Teaching Mathematics to Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Fred Spooner;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Amber A. Harris

  • A Meta-Analysis and Review of Sight Word Research and Its Implications for Teaching Functional Reading to Individuals with Moderate and Severe Disabilities:

    Diane M. Browder;Yan Ping Xin

  • Evidence-Based Practice for Teaching Academics to Students With Severe Developmental Disabilities

    Fred Spooner;Victoria F. Knight;Diane M. Browder;Bethany R. Smith

  • Using Time Delay to Teach Literacy to Students with Severe Developmental Disabilities

    Diane Browder;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Fred Spooner;Pamela J. Mims

  • Addressing the Academic Needs of Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Secondary Education

    Veronica P. Fleury;Susan Hedges;Kara Hume;Diane M. Browder

  • Teacher use of descriptive analysis data to implement interventions to decrease students' problem behaviors.

    J S Lalli;D M Browder;F C Mace;D K Brown

  • Literacy for Students With Severe Developmental Disabilities What Should We Teach and What Should We Hope to Achieve

    Diane Browder;Susan Gibbs;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Ginevra R. Courtade

  • Principals' Knowledge of Fundamental and Current Issues in Special Education

    Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Diane M. Browder;Claudia Flowers;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • The Alignment of Alternate Assessment Content with Academic and Functional Curricula

    Diane Browder;Claudia Flowers;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Meagan Karvonen

  • Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Early Literacy Program for Students with Significant Developmental Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell;Ginevra Courtade;Susan L. Gibbs

  • Putting Self-Determination into Practice

    Meagan Karvonen;David W. Test;Wendy M. Wood;Diane Browder

  • Teaching Elementary Students with Multiple Disabilities to Participate in Shared Stories

    Diane M. Browder;Pamela J. Mims;Fred Spooner;Lynn Ahlgrim-Delzell

  • Training Teachers to Follow a Task Analysis to Engage Middle School Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities in Grade-Appropriate Literature

    Diane M. Browder;Katherine Trela;Bree Jimenez

  • Creating Access to the General Curriculum With Links to Grade-Level Content for Students With Significant Cognitive Disabilities An Explication of the Concept

    Diane M. Browder;Shawnee Y. Wakeman;Claudia Flowers;Robert J. Rickelman

  • An Updated Evidence-Based Practice Review on Teaching Mathematics to Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities:

    Fred Spooner;Jenny R. Root;Alicia F. Saunders;Diane M. Browder

  • Evidence-Based Practices for Students with Severe Disabilities and the Requirement for Accountability in “No Child Left Behind”

    Diane M. Browder;Karena Cooper-Duffy

  • Teaching Mathematics and Science Standards to Students With Moderate and Severe Developmental Disabilities

    Diane M. Browder;Katherine Trela;Ginevra R. Courtade;Bree A. Jimenez

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Spooner
Fred Spooner University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Claudia Flowers
Claudia Flowers University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Wendy Wood
Wendy Wood University of Southern California
Bob Algozzine
Bob Algozzine University of North Carolina at Charlotte
David W. Test
David W. Test University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Edward S. Shapiro
Edward S. Shapiro Lehigh University
Asha K. Jitendra
Asha K. Jitendra University of California, Riverside
Sharon Vaughn
Sharon Vaughn The University of Texas at Austin
Martha E. Snell
Martha E. Snell University of Virginia
Jeff Sigafoos
Jeff Sigafoos Victoria University of Wellington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a variety of flexible and affordable online education options. For those who need to fast-track their education, accelerated online degree programs can significantly reduce the time it takes to complete a bachelor’s, giving you a quicker entry into the field.

If you’re considering postgraduate study, there are online masters degrees that can be finished in as little as one year. This is ideal for working professionals or anyone eager to advance their qualifications without a long commitment.

Want an affordable path into social work? The cheapest online master's in social work programs provide top-quality education at lower costs, making it easier to balance financial and career goals. For those focused on behavioral health, there are also highly respected online bcba programs that prepare you for a specialized career in applied behavior analysis.

With these options, it’s easier than ever to fit higher education into your life and prepare for diverse careers across the humanities and social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Diane M. Browder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles