World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cecilie Schou Andreassen

Cecilie Schou Andreassen

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
15743
World Ranking
7698
National Ranking
71

Cecilie Schou Andreassen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilie Schou Andreassen sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 77 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Cecilie Schou Andreassen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecilie Schou Andreassen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cecilie Schou Andreassen is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway. Their research primarily spans social sciences and psychology, with a focus on multiple intersecting subfields including sociology and political science, communication, applied psychology, education, and social psychology.

Their work has contributed to understanding the impact of technology on adolescents, social media and politics, child development in relation to digital technology, digital mental health interventions, issues related to workaholism, burnout, and well-being, as well as studies on perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety. Additionally, their research touches on topics concerning the wine industry and tourism.

Recent notable papers by Cecilie Schou Andreassen include:

  • Is it meaningful to distinguish between Facebook addiction and social networking sites addiction? Psychometric analysis of Facebook addiction and social networking sites addiction scales (2020, Current Psychology)
  • General and Alcohol-Related Social Media Use and Mental Health: a Large-Sample Longitudinal Study (2020, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction)
  • Work Addiction among Bank Employees in Italy: A Contribution to Validation of the Bergen Work Addiction Scale with a Focus on Measurement Invariance across Gender and Managerial Status (2022, Sustainability)
  • Demographical, personality, alcohol use, and mental health characteristics associated with different alcoholic beverage preferences among students (2020, Cogent Psychology)

Cecilie Schou Andreassen has frequently published in venues such as Current Psychology, the International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Sustainability, and Cogent Psychology.

Their collaborative network includes frequent coauthors Ståle Pallesen, Eilin K. Erevik, Øystein Vedaa, Torbjørn Torsheim, and Julia Maria Balcerowska, with multiple joint publications reflecting overlapping research interests.

Best Publications

  • Development of a Facebook Addiction Scale.

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Torbjørn Torsheim;Geir Scott Brunborg;Ståle Pallesen

  • The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Joël Billieux;Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss

  • The relationship between addictive use of social media, narcissism, and self-esteem: Findings from a large national survey.

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Ståle Pallesen;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Online Social Network Site Addiction: A Comprehensive Review

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen

  • Problematic Social Media Use: Results from a Large-Scale Nationally Representative Adolescent Sample

    Fanni Bányai;Ágnes Zsila;Orsolya Király;Aniko Maraz

  • Social network site addiction - an overview.

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Ståle Pallesen

  • The global epidemiology of anabolic-androgenic steroid use: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis.

    Dominic Sagoe;Helge Molde;Cecilie S. Andreassen;Torbjørn Torsheim

  • The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality.

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Mark D. Griffiths;Siri Renate Gjertsen;Elfrid Krossbakken

  • Development of a work addiction scale

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Mark D Griffiths;Jørn Hetland;Ståle Pallesen

  • Do age and gender differences exist in selfie-related behaviours?

    Amandeep Dhir;Ståle Pallesen;Torbjørn Torsheim;Cecilie Schou Andreassen

  • The relationship between ‘workaholism’, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Jørn Hetland;Ståle Pallesen

  • The relationship between strong motivation to work, “workaholism”, and health

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Holger Ursin;Hege R. Eriksen

  • Leadership and Fulfillment of the Three Basic Psychological Needs at Work.

    Hilde Hetland;Jørn Hetland;Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Ståle Pallesen

  • Predictors of Use of Social Network Sites at Work - A Specific Type of Cyberloafing

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Torbjørn Torsheim;Ståle Pallesen

  • Workaholism: An overview and current status of the research

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen

  • The Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale: reliability and validity of a brief screening test

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Mark D. Griffiths;Ståle Pallesen;Robert M Bilder

  • Facebook addiction among Polish undergraduate students: validity of measurement and relationship with personality and well-being

    Paweł Atroszko;Julia Maria Balcerowska;Piotr Bereznowski;Adriana Biernatowska

  • Polypharmacy among anabolic-androgenic steroid users: a descriptive metasynthesis

    Dominic Sagoe;Jim McVeigh;Astrid Bjørnebekk;Marie-Stella Essilfie

  • Gaming Addiction, Gaming Engagement, and Psychological Health Complaints Among Norwegian Adolescents

    Geir Scott Brunborg;Rune Aune Mentzoni;Ole Rogstad Melkevik;Torbjørn Torsheim

  • The Prevalence of Workaholism: A Survey Study in a Nationally Representative Sample of Norwegian Employees

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Mark D. Griffiths;Jørn Hetland;Luca Kravina

Frequent Co-Authors

Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen
Torbjørn Torsheim
Torbjørn Torsheim University of Bergen
Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Jørn Hetland
Jørn Hetland University of Bergen
Amandeep Dhir
Amandeep Dhir University of Agder
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Bjørn Bjorvatn
Bjørn Bjorvatn University of Bergen
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology from the USA opens doors to diverse online programs and unique career pathways. With the rise of digital learning, students can now access specializations like spiritual psychology career options, which focus on integrating mental health with personal belief systems—a growing field in holistic health care.

Another emerging area is sports psychology, where professionals work with athletes to enhance performance and well-being. The job outlook for sports psychologist roles is especially bright, with increasing demand in schools, professional teams, and wellness centers.

Prospective students should also understand the difference between a clinical psychologist vs therapist. The distinction often affects job roles, licensure requirements, and potential salaries, which is essential when considering specialization or advanced degrees.

For those considering the highest academic path, earning a doctorate can provide significant professional benefits. Reviewing phd psychology salary data demonstrates the rewarding outcomes in both academia and industry for advanced degree holders.

Best Scientists Citing Cecilie Schou Andreassen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles