World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julia Brailovskaia

Julia Brailovskaia

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 39 698 698 17 17 152 4915
Psychology 43 7347 6851 348 342 151 5836

Julia Brailovskaia publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia Brailovskaia between 2015 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia Brailovskaia published across 12 years, from 2015 to 2026, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 15 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 2 publications
2015 2026

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia Brailovskaia: publications per year, 2015 to 2026
Year Publications
2015 3
2016 4
2017 6
2018 11
2019 18
2020 24
2021 32
2022 24
2023 24
2024 19
2025 13
2026 2
Total 180
Download as CSV

Julia Brailovskaia publications per year - data summary

  • Julia Brailovskaia, a Psychology scholar from Ruhr University Bochum, has 180 publications recorded across 12 years, from 2015 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2015 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 32 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2026, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 15.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.0 per year counting only the 12 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 82 publications, 46% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2015-2018: 24 publications (6.0 per year); 2019-2022: 98 publications (24.5 per year); 2023-2026: 58 publications (14.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Julia Brailovskaia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Brailovskaia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 151 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 151
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia Brailovskaia publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Julia Brailovskaia, a Psychology scholar from Ruhr University Bochum, records 151 publications - the 50th percentile of the discipline.
  • 50% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Julia Brailovskaia, and about 50% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Julia Brailovskaia falls inside that same range.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Julia Brailovskaia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Brailovskaia sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Julia Brailovskaia D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Julia Brailovskaia, a Psychology scholar from Ruhr University Bochum, records 43 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Julia Brailovskaia, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Julia Brailovskaia ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Julia Brailovskaia is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany and has an extensive research portfolio primarily within the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their work spans several subfields, including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, applied psychology, social psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The focus of their research often intersects with technology and mental health.

The main topics explored in Brailovskaia's research include the impact of technology on adolescents, COVID-19 and mental health, digital mental health interventions, suicide and self-harm studies, child development and digital technology, resilience and mental health, as well as psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

They have contributed to numerous publications in various academic journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Current Psychology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
  • PLoS ONE
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use - An exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany," 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "The relationship between burden caused by coronavirus (Covid-19), addictive social media use, sense of control and anxiety," 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Predicting adaptive and maladaptive responses to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: A prospective longitudinal study," 2020, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology
  • "Less Facebook use - More well-being and a healthier lifestyle? An experimental intervention study," 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Behavioral measures to fight COVID-19: An 8-country study of perceived usefulness, adherence and their predictors," 2020, PLoS ONE

In addition to journal articles, Brailovskaia has authored book publications, including "Problematic Internet Technology Use: Assessment, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Adverse Consequences and Intervention," published in 2021 by Frontiers Media.

Their research collaborations include frequent coauthors such as:

  • Jürgen Margraf
  • Tobias Teismann
  • Hans-Werner Bierhoff
  • Lena-Marie Precht
  • Silvia Schneider

Julia Brailovskaia's body of work predominantly addresses psychological aspects related to technology use and mental health challenges, with a significant emphasis on the effects of social media and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Best Publications

  • The effects of daily stress on positive and negative mental health: Mediation through self-efficacy

    Pia Schönfeld;Julia Brailovskaia;Angela Bieda;Xiao Chi Zhang

  • Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use – An exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany

    Julia Brailovskaia;Holger Schillack;Jürgen Margraf

  • Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) among German students-A longitudinal approach.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Jürgen Margraf

  • The relationship between daily stress, social support and Facebook Addiction Disorder.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Elke Rohmann;Hans-Werner Bierhoff;Holger Schillack

  • Universal happiness? Cross-cultural measurement invariance of scales assessing positive mental health.

    Angela Bieda;Gerrit Hirschfeld;Pia Schönfeld;Julia Brailovskaia

  • The relationship between burden caused by Coronavirus (Covid-19), addictive social media use, sense of control and anxiety

    Julia Brailovskaia;Jürgen Margraf

  • Comparing Facebook Users and Facebook Non-Users: Relationship between Personality Traits and Mental Health Variables - An Exploratory Study.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Jürgen Margraf

  • Positive mental health moderates the association between depression and suicide ideation: A longitudinal study

    Tobias Teismann;Thomas Forkmann;Julia Brailovskaia;Paula Siegmann

  • Relationships between addictive Facebook use, depressiveness, insomnia, and positive mental health in an inpatient sample: A German longitudinal study.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Elke Rohmann;Hans-Werner Bierhoff;Jürgen Margraf

  • Less Facebook use – More well-being and a healthier lifestyle? An experimental intervention study

    Julia Brailovskaia;Fabienne Ströse;Holger Schillack;Jürgen Margraf

  • Cyberbullying, positive mental health and suicide ideation/behavior.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Tobias Teismann;Jürgen Margraf

  • Physical activity mediates the association between daily stress and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD) – A longitudinal approach among German students

    Julia Brailovskaia;Tobias Teismann;Jürgen Margraf

  • Behavioral measures to fight COVID-19: An 8-country study of perceived usefulness, adherence and their predictors.

    Jürgen Margraf;Julia Brailovskaia;Silvia Schneider

  • Cross-cultural narcissism on Facebook

    Julia Brailovskaia;Hans-Werner Bierhoff

  • Resilience to suicide ideation: A cross-cultural test of the buffering hypothesis

    Paula Siegmann;Tobias Teismann;Nathalie Fritsch;Thomas Forkmann

  • The association between depression symptoms, psychological burden caused by Covid-19 and physical activity: An investigation in Germany, Italy, Russia, and Spain.

    Julia Brailovskaia;Fiammetta Cosci;Giovanni Mansueto;Marta Miragall;Marta Miragall

  • Self-Efficacy as a Mechanism Linking Daily Stress to Mental Health in Students: A Three-Wave Cross-Lagged Study.

    Pia Schönfeld;Julia Brailovskaia;Xiao Chi Zhang;Jürgen Margraf

  • What does media use reveal about personality and mental health? An exploratory investigation among German students

    Julia Brailovskaia;Jürgen Margraf

  • A Cross-Cultural Study in Germany, Russia, and China: Are Resilient and Social Supported Students Protected Against Depression, Anxiety, and Stress?

    Julia Brailovskaia;Pia Schönfeld;Xiao Chi Zhang;Angela Bieda

  • The brave blue world: Facebook flow and Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD).

    Julia Brailovskaia;Elke Rohmann;Hans-Werner Bierhoff;Jürgen Margraf

  • Positive mental health moderates the association between depression and suicide ideation

    Tobias Teismann;Thomas Forkmann;Julia Brailovskaia;Paula Siegmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Jürgen Margraf
Jürgen Margraf Ruhr University Bochum
Thomas Forkmann
Thomas Forkmann University of Duisburg-Essen
Silvia Schneider
Silvia Schneider Ruhr University Bochum
Rosa M. Baños
Rosa M. Baños University of Valencia
Heide Glaesmer
Heide Glaesmer Leipzig University
Fiammetta Cosci
Fiammetta Cosci University of Florence
Johannes Michalak
Johannes Michalak Witten/Herdecke University
Georg Juckel
Georg Juckel Ruhr University Bochum
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Dmitri Rozgonjuk University of Tartu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide range of career opportunities, whether you are interested in clinical practice, counseling, research, or behavioral analysis. Many students choose accelerated psychology bachelor's degree programs to quickly begin their careers, benefiting from flexible study options and a faster path to graduation.

For those seeking advanced clinical roles, an accelerated psyd degree online allows you to efficiently pursue licensure and specialized practice in therapy or assessment. It’s essential to ensure your program is reputable, and selecting from apa-accredited clinical psychology programs ensures you’ll meet licensure and ethical standards.

Another fast-growing field is applied behavior analysis. High-quality aba programs online prepare you to work with individuals with behavioral challenges, including those on the autism spectrum. As you plan your psychology career, consider which degree pathway best matches your goals—from accelerated bachelor's options to specialized clinical or behavior analysis programs.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Brailovskaia

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles