World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cornelia Sindermann

Cornelia Sindermann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10293 9635 492 485 113 3827

Cornelia Sindermann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cornelia Sindermann between 2016 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cornelia Sindermann published across 10 years, from 2016 to 2025, averaging 14.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2021. 23 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2016 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2021. 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 5 publications
2016 2025

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cornelia Sindermann: publications per year, 2016 to 2025
Year Publications
2016 3
2017 2
2018 18
2019 16
2020 24
2021 30
2022 14
2023 11
2024 18
2025 5
Total 141
Download as CSV

Cornelia Sindermann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Sindermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 113
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Cornelia Sindermann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cornelia Sindermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cornelia Sindermann is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany and focuses on research primarily within the social sciences and psychology fields. Their work encompasses a range of subfields including sociology and political science, communication, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and clinical psychology.

The researcher's publication record includes 124 contributions in social sciences and 64 in psychology. Their subfield specialization is reflected through 84 publications in sociology and political science and 22 in communication, alongside studies in social psychology and clinical psychology.

Key research topics explored by Sindermann involve:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts

Their recent publications showcase engagement with issues related to social media, artificial intelligence, and personality psychology. Notable papers include:

  • Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media's impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association? (2020, Addictive Behaviors)
  • Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language (2020, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz)
  • Individual differences in Fear of Missing Out (FoMO): Age, gender, and the Big Five personality trait domains, facets, and items (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Examining the links between active Facebook use, received likes, self-esteem and happiness: A study using objective social media data (2020, Telematics and Informatics)
  • Acceptance and Fear of Artificial Intelligence: associations with personality in a German and a Chinese sample (2022, Discover Psychology)

Sindermann has collaborated frequently with various scholars. Regular co-authors include:

  • Christian Montag
  • Jon D. Elhai
  • Dmitri Rozgonjuk
  • Benjamin Becker
  • Keith M. Kendrick

The researcher has published multiple papers in established venues such as Frontiers in Psychology, Heliyon, Personality and Individual Differences, Discover Psychology, and Current Psychology. Their work is also represented in book form, including the publication "Online Psychology Beyond Addiction and Gaming: A Global Look at Mental Health and Internet-Related Technologies" (2022) through Frontiers Media.

Best Publications

  • Measurement and Conceptualization of Gaming Disorder According to the World Health Organization Framework: the Development of the Gaming Disorder Test

    Halley M. Pontes;Bruno Schivinski;Cornelia Sindermann;Mei Li

  • Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language

    Cornelia Sindermann;Peng Sha;Min Zhou;Jennifer Wernicke

  • The Role of Empathy and Life Satisfaction in Internet and Smartphone Use Disorder.

    Bernd Lachmann;Cornelia Sindermann;Rayna Y. Sariyska;Ruixue Luo

  • Individual differences in Fear of Missing Out (FoMO): Age, gender, and the Big Five personality trait domains, facets, and items

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • Examining the links between active Facebook use, received likes, self-esteem and happiness: A study using objective social media data

    Davide Marengo;Christian Montag;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai

  • Personality Associations With Smartphone and Internet Use Disorder: A Comparison Study Including Links to Impulsivity and Social Anxiety

    Jessica Peterka-Bonetta;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • Internet Communication Disorder and the structure of the human brain: initial insights on WeChat addiction.

    Christian Montag;Zhiying Zhao;Cornelia Sindermann;Lei Xu

  • An affective neuroscience framework for the molecular study of Internet addiction

    Christian Montag;Cornelia Sindermann;Benjamin Becker;Jaak Panksepp

  • Real-Time Functional Connectivity-Informed Neurofeedback of Amygdala-Frontal Pathways Reduces Anxiety.

    Zhiying Zhao;Shuxia Yao;Keshuang Li;Cornelia Sindermann

  • A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news.

    Cornelia Sindermann;Andrew Cooper;Christian Montag

  • The association between the Big Five personality traits and smartphone use disorder: A meta-analysis

    Davide Marengo;Cornelia Sindermann;Daniela Häckel;Michele Settanni

  • Associations between symptoms of problematic smartphone, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram use: An item-level exploratory graph analysis perspective

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D Elhai;Alexander P Christensen

  • Predicting tendencies towards the disordered use of Facebook's social media platforms: On the role of personality, impulsivity, and social anxiety.

    Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • Digital phenotyping in psychological and medical sciences: a reflection about necessary prerequisites to reduce harm and increase benefits.

    Christian Montag;Cornelia Sindermann;Harald Baumeister

  • Comparing Smartphone, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat: Which Platform Elicits the Greatest Use Disorder Symptoms?

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • The relationship between Internet Use Disorder, depression and burnout among Chinese and German college students.

    Jessica Peterka-Bonetta;Cornelia Sindermann;Peng Sha;Min Zhou

  • A randomized trial shows dose-frequency and genotype may determine the therapeutic efficacy of intranasal oxytocin.

    Juan Kou;Yingying Zhang;Feng Zhou;Cornelia Sindermann

  • A functional polymorphism of the OXTR gene is associated with autistic traits in Caucasian and Asian populations.

    Christian Montag;Christian Montag;Cornelia Sindermann;Martin Melchers;Sonja Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Benjamin Becker
Benjamin Becker University of Hong Kong
Keith M. Kendrick
Keith M. Kendrick University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Dmitri Rozgonjuk
Dmitri Rozgonjuk University of Tartu
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Jaak Panksepp
Jaak Panksepp Washington State University
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Adam J. Guastella
Adam J. Guastella University of Sydney
Halley M. Pontes
Halley M. Pontes Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to various roles in mental health, education, and counseling. Many students choose to begin or advance their studies with related online degrees, which can offer flexibility and access to highly ranked programs across the country.

For those interested in a counseling-focused pathway, consider exploring regional programs that fit your lifestyle and goals. For example, you can find top counseling degree programs in Texas known for their comprehensive training and strong clinical opportunities. Similarly, students on the West Coast might explore the top counseling degree programs in Washington, which often integrate technology and innovative therapeutic techniques.

Beyond state-specific options, those seeking networking and policy opportunities might be drawn to Washington, D.C. counseling degree programs. For broader selection along the Pacific and neighboring regions, check out West counseling degree programs, which often feature unique specializations and distance-learning options.

With a degree in psychology or counseling, graduates can pursue careers in mental health services, education, social work, or private practice. Online study makes it easier than ever to connect with top programs, wherever you are located.

Best Scientists Citing Cornelia Sindermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles