World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
12369
World Ranking
3716
National Ranking
395

Marcantonio M. Spada publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcantonio M. Spada sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marcantonio M. Spada D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcantonio M. Spada sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcantonio M. Spada is affiliated with London South Bank University in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly focuses on the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and Education.

The researcher's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Marcantonio M. Spada include:

  • Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review, 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Social norms and e-motions in problematic social media use among adolescents, 2020, Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Social anxiety and Internet gaming disorder: The role of motives and metacognitions, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Marcantonio M. Spada collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Gabriele Caselli
  • Ana V. Nikčević
  • Claudia Marino
  • Giovanni Mansueto
  • Sara Palmieri

Their research has been published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Marcantonio M. Spada has also contributed to book publications, with one title published by Frontiers Media:

  • Addictive behaviors among youth and adolescents in the digital age, 2024

Best Publications

  • An overview of problematic internet use.

    Marcantonio M. Spada

  • The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review.

    Daniel L. King;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Natacha Carragher;Joel Billieux

  • A comprehensive meta-analysis on Problematic Facebook Use

    Claudia Marino;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Claudia Marino;Daniel C. Kolubinski;Dawn Leach

  • Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire 30

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Changiz Mohiyeddini;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Metacognition in addictive behaviors

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Ana V. Nikčević;Adrian Wells

  • The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Benjamin Langston;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta

  • Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Kalliopi Hiou;Ana V. Nikcevic

  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • The Relationship among Metacognitions, Attentional Control, and State Anxiety

    Marcantonio M. Spada;George A. Georgiou;Adrian Wells

  • The Desire Thinking Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Properties

    Gabriele Caselli;Marcantonio M. Spada;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • A triphasic metacognitive formulation of problem drinking.

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Metacognitions, emotion and alcohol use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Adrian Wells

  • Rumination as a predictor of drinking behaviour in alcohol abusers: a prospective study

    Gabriele Caselli;Claudio Ferretti;Mauro Leoni;Daniela Rebecchi

  • Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents.

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Alessio Vieno;Massimiliano Pastore;Ian P. Albery

  • Metacognition as a mediator of the relationship between emotion and smoking dependence

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Cyberchondria: Examining relations with problematic Internet use and metacognitive beliefs.

    Thomas A. Fergus;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Metacognition as a Mediator of the Effect of Test Anxiety on a Surface Approach to Studying

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikcevic;Giovanni B. Moneta;Judy Ireson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Caselli
Gabriele Caselli London South Bank University
Ana V. Nikčević
Ana V. Nikčević Kingston University
Adrian Wells
Adrian Wells University of Manchester
Alessio Vieno
Alessio Vieno University of Padua
Gianluca Gini
Gianluca Gini University of Padua
Thomas A. Fergus
Thomas A. Fergus Baylor University
Richard Brown
Richard Brown King's College London
Peter Fisher
Peter Fisher University of Liverpool
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a wide range of related careers in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students choose to further specialize by earning advanced and flexible credentials from leading universities across the United States.

If you are considering careers that combine psychological theory with practical support for individuals and communities, social work is a strong pathway. Students based on the West Coast can explore top online social work programs in California, offering diverse curriculums focused on social justice and advocacy.

For professionals pursuing the highest academic credentials, several institutions provide the best online dsw programs in America, ideal for those aiming for leadership and research roles. In Florida, there are dedicated opportunities to earn top online social work degrees in Florida, reflecting the state’s strong community health focus.

Additionally, aspiring practitioners in New England can benefit from the top online social work programs in Massachusetts, known for their emphasis on clinical practice and social policy. Each of these high-quality pathways can complement your psychology background and expand your future career options.

Best Scientists Citing Marcantonio M. Spada

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles