World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 59 3716 3426 395 375 254 12369

Marcantonio M. Spada publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcantonio M. Spada between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcantonio M. Spada published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 13.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2021. 31 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2021. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 11 publications
2005 2025

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcantonio M. Spada: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 3
2007 7
2008 8
2009 7
2010 6
2011 8
2012 9
2013 7
2014 6
2015 23
2016 16
2017 18
2018 19
2019 14
2020 14
2021 32
2022 26
2023 22
2024 20
2025 11
Total 278
Download as CSV

Marcantonio M. Spada publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcantonio M. Spada sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 254
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcantonio M. Spada D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcantonio M. Spada sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325 59
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marcantonio M. Spada is affiliated with London South Bank University in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly focuses on the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, and Education.

The researcher's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Marcantonio M. Spada include:

  • Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review, 2020, Clinical Psychology Review
  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties, 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • Social norms and e-motions in problematic social media use among adolescents, 2020, Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Social anxiety and Internet gaming disorder: The role of motives and metacognitions, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Marcantonio M. Spada collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Gabriele Caselli
  • Ana V. Nikčević
  • Claudia Marino
  • Giovanni Mansueto
  • Sara Palmieri

Their research has been published extensively in several venues, notably:

  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Marcantonio M. Spada has also contributed to book publications, with one title published by Frontiers Media:

  • Addictive behaviors among youth and adolescents in the digital age, 2024

Best Publications

  • An overview of problematic internet use.

    Marcantonio M. Spada

  • The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review.

    Daniel L. King;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Natacha Carragher;Joel Billieux

  • A comprehensive meta-analysis on Problematic Facebook Use

    Claudia Marino;Gianluca Gini;Alessio Vieno;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Claudia Marino;Daniel C. Kolubinski;Dawn Leach

  • Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Measuring metacognitions associated with emotional distress: Factor structure and predictive validity of the metacognitions questionnaire 30

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Changiz Mohiyeddini;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Metacognition in addictive behaviors

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Ana V. Nikčević;Adrian Wells

  • The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Benjamin Langston;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta

  • Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Kalliopi Hiou;Ana V. Nikcevic

  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • The Relationship among Metacognitions, Attentional Control, and State Anxiety

    Marcantonio M. Spada;George A. Georgiou;Adrian Wells

  • The Desire Thinking Questionnaire: Development and Psychometric Properties

    Gabriele Caselli;Marcantonio M. Spada;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • A triphasic metacognitive formulation of problem drinking.

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Metacognitions, emotion and alcohol use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Adrian Wells

  • Rumination as a predictor of drinking behaviour in alcohol abusers: a prospective study

    Gabriele Caselli;Claudio Ferretti;Mauro Leoni;Daniela Rebecchi

  • Modeling the contribution of personality, social identity and social norms to problematic Facebook use in adolescents.

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Alessio Vieno;Massimiliano Pastore;Ian P. Albery

  • Metacognition as a mediator of the relationship between emotion and smoking dependence

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Cyberchondria: Examining relations with problematic Internet use and metacognitive beliefs.

    Thomas A. Fergus;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Metacognition as a Mediator of the Effect of Test Anxiety on a Surface Approach to Studying

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikcevic;Giovanni B. Moneta;Judy Ireson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriele Caselli
Gabriele Caselli London South Bank University
Ana V. Nikčević
Ana V. Nikčević Kingston University
Adrian Wells
Adrian Wells University of Manchester
Alessio Vieno
Alessio Vieno University of Padua
Gianluca Gini
Gianluca Gini University of Padua
Thomas A. Fergus
Thomas A. Fergus Baylor University
Richard Brown
Richard Brown King's College London
Peter Fisher
Peter Fisher University of Liverpool
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen
Merete Nordentoft
Merete Nordentoft University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens doors to a wide range of related careers in social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students choose to further specialize by earning advanced and flexible credentials from leading universities across the United States.

If you are considering careers that combine psychological theory with practical support for individuals and communities, social work is a strong pathway. Students based on the West Coast can explore top online social work programs in California, offering diverse curriculums focused on social justice and advocacy.

For professionals pursuing the highest academic credentials, several institutions provide the best online dsw programs in America, ideal for those aiming for leadership and research roles. In Florida, there are dedicated opportunities to earn top online social work degrees in Florida, reflecting the state’s strong community health focus.

Additionally, aspiring practitioners in New England can benefit from the top online social work programs in Massachusetts, known for their emphasis on clinical practice and social policy. Each of these high-quality pathways can complement your psychology background and expand your future career options.

Best Scientists Citing Marcantonio M. Spada

Trending Scientists