World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
74
Citations
17966
World Ranking
1900
National Ranking
216

Peter Salmon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Salmon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 329 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Salmon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Salmon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Salmon is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom and conducts research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences. Their work spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Applied Psychology.

The scientist's research focuses on key topics such as Family Support in Illness, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, Optimism, Hope, and Well-being, Cancer Survivorship and Care, and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life.

Among recent publications attributable to Peter Salmon, notable works include:

  • Introducing Derrida, 2023, published in Think

Other recent papers co-authored or closely associated with their research network include:

  • Predictors of emotional distress in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review of prospective studies, 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Communication and support of patients and caregivers in chronic cancer care: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline, 2024, ESMO Open
  • The questionable efficacy of manualized psychological treatments for distressed breast cancer patients: An individual patient data meta-analysis, 2020, Clinical Psychology Review

Peter Salmon frequently collaborates with other researchers including Peter Fisher, Friedrich Stiefel, Céline Bourquin, Leila Achtari Jeanneret, and S. Dauchy. Collaborative efforts span multiple disciplines and contribute to a diverse research output.

Their work has appeared in a variety of publication venues with distributions as follows:

  • ESMO Open
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Clinical Psychology Review
  • Think

In addition to journal articles, Peter Salmon has contributed to book publications, notably with Cambridge University Press. One such work is Clinical Communication, expected in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depression, and sensitivity to stress: a unifying theory.

    Peter Salmon

  • Patients' perceptions of medical explanations for somatisation disorders: qualitative analysis.

    Peter Salmon;Sarah Peters;Ian Stanley

  • Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study

    Emma Burkitt Wright;Christopher Holcombe;Peter Salmon

  • The somatising effect of clinical consultation: what patients and doctors say and do not say when patients present medically unexplained physical symptoms.

    Adele Ring;Christopher F. Dowrick;Gerry M. Humphris;John Davies

  • ENDOSCOPIC PREDICTION OF RECURRENT BLEEDING IN PEPTIC-ULCERS

    D W Storey;S G Bown;C P Swain;P R Salmon

  • Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: The Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES)

    Christa Zimmermann;Lidia Del Piccolo;Jozien Bensing;Svein Bergvik

  • Patient empowerment and control: a psychological discourse in the service of medicine.

    Peter Salmon;George M Hall

  • Voiced but unheard agendas: qualitative analysis of the psychosocial cues that patients with unexplained symptoms present to general practitioners

    Peter Salmon;Christopher F Dowrick;Adele Ring;Gerry M Humphris

  • Patients with medically unexplained symptoms: sources of patients' authority and implications for demands on medical care.

    Sarah Peters;Ian Stanley;Michael Rose;Peter Salmon

  • Creativity in clinical communication: from communication skills to skilled communication.

    Peter Salmon;Bridget Young

  • Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: Patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively.

    Peter Salmon;George M. Hall;Denise Peerbhoy;Alan Shenkin

  • Normalisation of unexplained symptoms by general practitioners: a functional typology.

    Christopher F Dowrick;Adele Ring;Gerry M Humphris;Peter Salmon

  • Do patients with unexplained physical symptoms pressurise general practitioners for somatic treatment? A qualitative study

    Adele Ring;Christopher Dowrick;Gerry Humphris;Peter Salmon

  • Development of the Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences to code health providers' responses (VR-CoDES-P) to patient cues and concerns.

    Lidia Del Piccolo;Hanneke de Haes;Cathy Heaven;Jesse Jansen

  • What do general practice patients want when they present medically unexplained symptoms, and why do their doctors feel pressurized?

    Peter Salmon;Adele Ring;Christopher F. Dowrick;Gerry M. Humphris

  • Stress: From synapse to syndrome.

    S. Clare Stanford;Peter Salmon

  • What Do Patients Choose to Tell Their Doctors? Qualitative Analysis of Potential Barriers to Reattributing Medically Unexplained Symptoms

    Sarah Peters;Anne Rogers;Peter Salmon;Linda Gask

  • Conflict, collusion or collaboration in consultations about medically unexplained symptoms: the need for a curriculum of medical explanation.

    Peter Salmon

  • Universal Mental Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review

    Lawrence S. Wissow;Jonathan Brown;Kate E. Fothergill;Anne Gadomski

  • Dependence and caring in clinical communication: The relevance of attachment and other theories

    Peter Salmon;Bridget Young

  • Assessing the quality of qualitative research.

    Peter Salmon

Frequent Co-Authors

Bridget Young
Bridget Young University of Liverpool
Peter Fisher
Peter Fisher University of Liverpool
Sarah Peters
Sarah Peters University of Manchester
Richard Morriss
Richard Morriss University of Nottingham
Gerry Humphris
Gerry Humphris University of St Andrews
Linda Gask
Linda Gask University of Manchester
Jonathan Hill
Jonathan Hill University of Reading
Graham Dunn
Graham Dunn University of Manchester
Lawrence S. Wissow
Lawrence S. Wissow University of Washington
Elspeth Guthrie
Elspeth Guthrie University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in psychology, there are several related online degrees and rewarding career pathways to consider. A popular option is speech-language pathology, a field focused on helping individuals with communication and swallowing disorders. Pursuing a career as a speech-language pathologist typically requires at least a master’s degree, clinical experience, and a state-specific license.

Each state has its own specific requirements. For example, students interested in working in Illinois should review slp requirements in Illinois. Those considering Indiana can learn about how to become a speech language pathologist in Indiana. If Iowa is your destination, explore slp requirements in Iowa. For those choosing Kansas, be sure to check out Kansas speech pathologist certification requirements.

Whether you want to pursue clinical work or research, understanding these requirements is vital for your success. Online degrees in psychology or speech-language pathology can prepare you for licensure and a diverse range of career opportunities in healthcare, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Salmon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles