World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
82
Citations
81256
World Ranking
1288
National Ranking
48

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
81735
World Ranking
15829
National Ranking
834

Bernd Löwe publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Löwe sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 410 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Bernd Löwe D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernd Löwe sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bernd Löwe is affiliated with Universität Hamburg in Germany and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their work spans significant subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, General Health Professions, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research focuses on several key topics in health and mental health, notably:

  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Bernd Löwe has contributed recent papers covering diverse issues in health sciences and mental health. Some of these publications include:

  • "Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis," 2020, Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)
  • "Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "Functional somatic disorders: discussion paper for a new common classification for research and clinical use," 2020, BMC Medicine
  • "Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Persistent physical symptoms: definition, genesis, and management," 2024, The Lancet

Their publications are frequently found in scientific journals such as:

  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research
  • BMJ Open
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Bernd Löwe has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including Angelika Weigel, Anne Toussaint, Sebastian Kohlmann, Christoph Schramm, and Martin Härter, reflecting interdisciplinary teamwork in mental health and related fields.

Best Publications

  • A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7

    RL Spitzer;K Kroenke;JB Williams;B Lowe

  • Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection

    Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B.W. Williams;Patrick O. Monahan

  • Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population

    Bernd Löwe;Oliver Decker;Stefanie Müller;Elmar Brähler

  • The Patient Health Questionnaire Somatic, Anxiety, and Depressive Symptom Scales: a systematic review.

    Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B.W. Williams;Bernd Löwe

  • An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4.

    Kurt Kroenke;Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B.W. Williams;Bernd Löwe

  • A 4-item measure of depression and anxiety: Validation and standardization of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in the general population.

    Bernd Löwe;Inka Wahl;Matthias Rose;Carsten Spitzer

  • Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

    Bernd Löwe;Bernd Löwe;Kurt Kroenke;Wolfgang Herzog;Kerstin Gräfe

  • Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2).

    Bernd Löwe;Bernd Löwe;Kurt Kroenke;Kerstin Gräfe

  • Monitoring depression treatment outcomes with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9

    Bernd Löwe;Jürgen Unützer;Christopher M Callahan;Anthony J Perkins

  • Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses.

    Bernd Löwe;Robert L. Spitzer;Kerstin Gräfe;Kurt Kroenke

  • Depression, anxiety and somatization in primary care: syndrome overlap and functional impairment

    Bernd Löwe;Robert L. Spitzer;Janet B.W. Williams;Monika Mussell

  • Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem “Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)“

    Kerstin Gräfe;Stephan Zipfel;Wolfgang Herzog;Bernd Löwe

  • The somatic symptom scale-8 (SSS-8): a brief measure of somatic symptom burden.

    Benjamin Gierk;Sebastian Kohlmann;Kurt Kroenke;Kurt Kroenke;Kurt Kroenke;Lena Spangenberg

  • Long-term prognosis in anorexia nervosa: lessons from a 21-year follow-up study

    Stephan Zipfel;Bernd Löwe;Deborah Lynn Reas;Hans-Christian Deter

  • Focal psychodynamic therapy, cognitive behaviour therapy, and optimised treatment as usual in outpatients with anorexia nervosa (ANTOP study): randomised controlled trial

    Stephan Zipfel;Beate Wild;Gaby Groß;Hans-Christoph Friederich

  • Sensitivity to change and minimal clinically important difference of the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)

    Anne Toussaint;Paul Hüsing;Antje Gumz;Katja Wingenfeld

  • Long-term outcome of anorexia nervosa in a prospective 21-year follow-up study.

    B. Löwe;S. Zipfel;C. Buchholz;Y. Dupont

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

    Yin Wu;Brooke Levis;Kira E. Riehm;Nazanin Saadat

  • Diagnosing ICD-10 Depressive Episodes: Superior Criterion Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire

    Bernd Löwe;Kerstin Gräfe;Stephan Zipfel;Steffen Witte

  • Detecting panic disorder in medical and psychosomatic outpatients: comparative validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire, a screening question, and physicians' diagnosis.

    Bernd Löwe;Kerstin Gräfe;Stephan Zipfel;Robert L Spitzer

  • Recognition of distress and psychiatric morbidity in cancer patients: a multi-method approach

    M. Keller;S. Sommerfeldt;C. Fischer;L. Knight

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Rose
Matthias Rose Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Stephan Zipfel
Stephan Zipfel University of Tübingen
Katja Wingenfeld
Katja Wingenfeld Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Karl Wegscheider
Karl Wegscheider Universität Hamburg
Carsten Spitzer
Carsten Spitzer University of Rostock
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University
Martin Härter
Martin Härter Universität Hamburg
Peter Henningsen
Peter Henningsen Technical University of Munich
Hans-Helmut König
Hans-Helmut König Universität Hamburg
Björn Meyer
Björn Meyer City, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in psychology, there are several related online degree options that open doors to meaningful careers. Social work is one of the most popular choices, offering flexibility through accredited online programs. These degrees are ideal for working adults, career changers, or anyone seeking to balance study and personal commitments.

When choosing an online social work degree, key factors to consider include program value, accreditation, and local job opportunities. For instance, the best value online social work programs in Dubuque and the most valuable online social work degrees in Indiana offer robust curricula with great return on investment. Similarly, the most valuable online social work programs in Kansas focus on practical skills and fieldwork, while the best value online social work degrees in Maryland connect graduates with strong local networks.

These programs can lead to careers in counseling, case management, school social work, and mental health advocacy. Exploring these pathways alongside psychology can broaden your expertise and expand your career options in the helping professions.

Best Scientists Citing Bernd Löwe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles