World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
53
Citations
12455
World Ranking
4768
National Ranking
508

Björn Meyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Meyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Björn Meyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Björn Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Björn Meyer is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Oncology.

The scientist's work centers on key topics such as Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mental Health Research Topics, the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies, Cancer Survivorship and Care, Behavioral Health and Interventions, and Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment Studies.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Björn Meyer include Thomas Berger, Jan Philipp Klein, Steffen Moritz, Christoph Heesen, and Stefan M. Gold.

The main venues where Meyer publishes research contributions are:

  • PLoS ONE
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • BMC Neurology

Significant recent publications include:

  • "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression" (2021, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • "Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data" (2021, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • "Effectiveness of a tailored, integrative Internet intervention (deprexis) for depression: Updated meta-analysis" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "Results of the Optimune trial: A randomized controlled trial evaluating a novel Internet intervention for breast cancer survivors" (2021, PLoS ONE)
  • "Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy programme to reduce depressive symptoms in patients with multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial" (2023, The Lancet Digital Health)

Best Publications

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Efficacy of self-guided internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of depressive symptoms a meta-analysis of individual participant data

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos W. Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • Coping with Severe Mental Illness: Relations of the Brief COPE with Symptoms, Functioning, and Well-Being

    Bjorn Meyer

  • Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial

    Björn Meyer;Thomas Berger;Franz Caspar;Christopher G Beevers

  • Responsiveness to Threat and Incentive in Bipolar Disorder: Relations of the BIS/BAS Scales With Symptoms.

    Björn Meyer;Sheri L. Johnson;Ray Winters

  • Predictors of treatment dropout in self-guided web-based interventions for depression: an 'individual patient data' meta-analysis

    Eirini Karyotaki;Annet M. Kleiboer;Filip Smit;David Trevor Turner

  • Treatment expectancies, patient alliance, and outcome: further analyses from the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

    Bjorn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis;Janice L. Krupnick;Matthew K. Egan

  • Efficacy of Self-guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in the Treatment of Depressive Symptoms

    Eirini Karyotaki;Heleen Riper;Jos Twisk;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • Influence of initial severity of depression on effectiveness of low intensity interventions: meta-analysis of individual patient data

    Peter Bower;Evangelos Kontopantelis;Alex Sutton;Tony Kendrick

  • Daily activities and sleep quality in college students.

    Colleen E. Carney;Jack D. Edinger;Björn Meyer;Linda Lindman

  • Increases in manic symptoms after life events involving goal attainment.

    Sheri L. Johnson;David Sandrow;Björn Meyer;Ray Winters

  • Social support and the course of bipolar disorder.

    Sheri L. Johnson;Carol A. Winett;Bjorn Meyer;William J. Greenhouse

  • Do guided internet-based interventions result in clinically relevant changes for patients with depression? An individual participant data meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;David Daniel Ebert;Liesje Donkin;Heleen Riper

  • Exploring Behavioral Activation and Inhibition Sensitivities Among College Students at Risk for Bipolar Spectrum Symptomatology

    Björn Meyer;Sheri L. Johnson;Charles S. Carver

  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Aya Suganuma;Edoardo G. Ostinelli;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Social support and self-esteem predict changes in bipolar depression but not mania.

    Sheri L. Johnson;Bjorn Meyer;Carol Winett;Juan Small

  • Attachment styles and personality disorders as predictors of symptom course.

    Björn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis;Joseph M. Proietti;Carol L. Heape

  • Sensory sensitivity, attachment experiences, and rejection responses among adults with borderline and avoidant features

    Björn Meyer;Muriel Ajchenbrenner;David P. Bowles

  • Effects of an Internet intervention (Deprexis) on severe depression symptoms: Randomized controlled trial

    Björn Meyer;Julia Bierbrodt;Johanna Schröder;Thomas Berger

  • An Attachment Model of Personality Disorders.

    Björn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis

  • What's in a (neutral) face? Personality disorders, attachment styles, and the appraisal of ambiguous social cues.

    Björn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis;Christopher G. Beevers

Frequent Co-Authors

Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Johanna Schröder
Johanna Schröder Medical School Hamburg
Matthias Rose
Matthias Rose Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Fritz Hohagen
Fritz Hohagen University of Lübeck
Wolfgang Lutz
Wolfgang Lutz University of Trier
Bernd Löwe
Bernd Löwe Universität Hamburg
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
Martin Hautzinger
Martin Hautzinger University of Tübingen
Eirini Karyotaki
Eirini Karyotaki Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degrees and unique career pathways. Many students choose to specialize further by pursuing board certification, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). The process for becoming a bcba in Gilbert involves completing graduate-level coursework and supervised fieldwork, both of which can often be done through online programs.

Requirements and pathways can differ by location. For example, those interested in learning how to become a bcba in Glendale or exploring Greensboro bcba requirements will find region-specific guidelines and practicum options. Understanding the bcba certification requirements in Henderson helps illustrate how online studies can be adapted to meet different state standards.

Online psychology degrees provide flexibility and accessibility for students and professionals alike, making it easier to qualify for advanced credentials or shift into specialized fields of practice. As you map your education and career journey, be sure to research degree requirements in your state and explore different pathways within the broad field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Björn Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles