World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 60 3532 3256 1990 1792 183 13815

Christopher G. Beevers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher G. Beevers between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher G. Beevers published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2019. 19 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2019. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
1989 2025

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher G. Beevers: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 6
2005 6
2006 4
2007 10
2008 5
2009 9
2010 11
2011 13
2012 6
2013 11
2014 10
2015 10
2016 8
2017 7
2018 14
2019 16
2020 10
2021 15
2022 8
2023 6
2024 11
2025 8
Total 212
Download as CSV

Christopher G. Beevers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Beevers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 183 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 183
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher G. Beevers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher G. Beevers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 60
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christopher G. Beevers is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily spans the domains of psychology and neuroscience, with a strong focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Other areas of study include applied psychology, clinical psychology, and pharmacology.

Their work covers several main topics including mental health research, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. They have a significant interest in digital mental health interventions, functional brain connectivity studies, treatment of major depression, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and the impact of technology on adolescents.

Christopher G. Beevers has published papers in a variety of academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Cognitive Therapy and Research
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Scientific Reports

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Beevers include:

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression, 2021, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Dismantling, Optimising, and Personalising Internet Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Component Network Meta-Analysis Using Individual Participant Data, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Getting Fewer "Likes" Than Others on Social Media Elicits Emotional Distress Among Victimized Adolescents, 2020, Child Development
  • Implementing Precision Methods in Personalizing Psychological Therapies: Barriers and Possible Ways Forward, 2023, Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Not Just "Big" Data: Importance of Sample Size, Measurement Error, and Uninformative Predictors for Developing Prognostic Models for Digital Interventions, 2022, Behaviour Research and Therapy

Christopher G. Beevers has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Jason Shumake
  • Mary McNamara
  • David M. Schnyer
  • Jasper A. J. Smits
  • Kean J. Hsu

Best Publications

  • Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression

    Seth G. Disner;Christopher G. Beevers;Emily A. P. Haigh;Aaron T. Beck

  • Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Orestis Efthimiou;Orestis Efthimiou;Clara Miguel;Clara Miguel;Frederic Maas Genannt Bermpohl

  • Cognitive vulnerability to depression: A dual process model

    Christopher G. Beevers

  • Effectiveness of a Novel Integrative Online Treatment for Depression (Deprexis): Randomized Controlled Trial

    Björn Meyer;Thomas Berger;Franz Caspar;Christopher G Beevers

  • Using Network Analysis to Identify Central Symptoms of Adolescent Depression

    Michael C Mullarkey;Igor Marchetti;Igor Marchetti;Christopher G Beevers

  • Time course of selective attention in clinically depressed young adults: An eye tracking study

    Jennifer L. Kellough;Christopher G. Beevers;Alissa J. Ellis;Tony T. Wells

  • Biased attention and dysphoria: Manipulating selective attention reduces subsequent depressive symptoms

    Tony T. Wells;Christopher G. Beevers

  • Discontinuities and cognitive changes in an exposure-based cognitive therapy for depression.

    Adele M. Hayes;Greg C. Feldman;Christopher G. Beevers;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Avoidance and processing as predictors of symptom change and positive growth in an integrative therapy for depression

    Adele M Hayes;Christopher G Beevers;Gregory C Feldman;Jean-Philippe Laurenceau

  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Aya Suganuma;Edoardo G. Ostinelli;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Depression and the Ironic Effects of Thought Suppression: Therapeutic Strategies for Improving Mental Control

    Christopher G. Beevers;Richard M. Wenzlaff;Adele M. Hayes;Walter D. Scott

  • Attentional Bias and Mood Persistence as Prospective Predictors of Dysphoria

    Christopher G. Beevers;Charles S. Carver

  • Association of the serotonin transporter gene promoter region (5-HTTLPR) polymorphism with biased attention for emotional stimuli.

    Christopher G. Beevers;Tony T. Wells;Alissa J. Ellis;John E. McGeary

  • Attention bias modification for major depressive disorder: Effects on attention bias, resting state connectivity, and symptom change.

    Christopher G. Beevers;Peter C. Clasen;Philip M. Enock;David M. Schnyer

  • Effects of an Internet intervention (Deprexis) on severe depression symptoms: Randomized controlled trial

    Björn Meyer;Julia Bierbrodt;Johanna Schröder;Thomas Berger

  • The prevention of depressive symptoms in low-income, minority children: two-year follow-up.

    Esteban V. Cardemil;Karen J. Reivich;Christopher G. Beevers;Martin E.P. Seligman

  • Perfectionism, Cognitive Bias, and Hopelessness as Prospective Predictors of Suicidal Ideation

    Christopher G. Beevers;Ivan W. Miller

  • Serotonin transporter genetic variation and biased attention for emotional word stimuli among psychiatric inpatients.

    Christopher G. Beevers;Brandon E. Gibb;John E. McGeary;Ivan W. Miller

  • What's in a (neutral) face? Personality disorders, attachment styles, and the appraisal of ambiguous social cues.

    Björn Meyer;Paul A. Pilkonis;Christopher G. Beevers

  • A consensus-based transparency checklist

    Balazs Aczel;Barnabas Szaszi;Alexandra Sarafoglou;Zoltan Kekecs

  • Frontal-Limbic White Matter Pathway Associations with the Serotonin Transporter Gene Promoter Region (5-HTTLPR) Polymorphism

    Jennifer Pacheco;Christopher G. Beevers;Cristina Benavides;John McGeary

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. McGeary
John E. McGeary Brown University
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Ivan W. Miller
Ivan W. Miller Brown University
Björn Meyer
Björn Meyer City, University of London
W. Todd Maddox
W. Todd Maddox The University of Texas at Austin
Brandon E. Gibb
Brandon E. Gibb Binghamton University
Valerie S. Knopik
Valerie S. Knopik Purdue University West Lafayette
Jasper A. J. Smits
Jasper A. J. Smits The University of Texas at Austin
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Michael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology keeps growing, many students are looking for flexible and affordable ways to earn their degrees online. Options like the fastest online psychology degrees in Texas let students accelerate their studies and enter the workforce sooner. This is an excellent choice for those aiming for quick career progression or seeking to balance education with work or family responsibilities.

Accelerated pathways are also available beyond Texas. For example, accelerated online psychology programs in Washington and accelerated online psychology programs in Wisconsin help students fast-track their education with flexible schedules and a focus on essential coursework.

Affordability is a key concern for many learners. Those seeking cost-effective options can explore affordable online psychology bachelor's degrees in Colorado. Choosing an accredited and recognized online program is important for both career prospects and further advanced study. Whether your goal is counseling, research, education, or organizational roles, these degree pathways provide a solid foundation to begin a psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher G. Beevers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles