World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
14496
World Ranking
2989
National Ranking
1714

W. Todd Maddox publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Todd Maddox sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

W. Todd Maddox D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Todd Maddox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Todd Maddox is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to behavioral neuroscience, psychology, and coastal studies, with notable contributions in infant health and development, neuroendocrine regulation, and coastal and marine dynamics.

Their recent publications include work focused on both biological and environmental sciences:

  • Spontaneous Ultrasonic Vocalization Transmission in Adult, Male Long-Evans Rats Is Age-Dependent and Sensitive to EtOH Modulation (2020, Brain Sciences)
  • Acoustilytix™: A Web-Based Automated Ultrasonic Vocalization Scoring Platform (2021, Brain Sciences)
  • A Case Study of Post-Industrial Shoreline Recovery on Canada's Pacific Coast (2024, Journal of Coastal Research)
  • A Review of Geomorphological Salt Marsh Research Methodologies (2024, Journal of Coastal Research)

Their work addresses a range of topics including:

  • Infant Health and Development
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Coastal and Marine Dynamics
  • Maritime and Coastal Archaeology

Maddox's research fields include pharmacy, social psychology, behavioral neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and physiology. This interdisciplinary approach manifests in their diverse publication venues, with two main areas of focus:

  • Brain Sciences, where studies on vocalization and related neurobehavioral phenomena have been published
  • Journal of Coastal Research, featuring investigations into shoreline recovery and salt marsh geomorphology

Collaborative efforts with other researchers are evident in their frequent coauthors, who contribute expertise in related domains:

  • Nitish Mittal
  • Christine L. Duvauchelle
  • Timothy Schallert
  • Catherine B. Ashley
  • Ryan D. Snyder

Best Publications

  • Human Category Learning

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox

  • Relations between prototype, exemplar, and decision bound models of categorization

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox

  • Delayed feedback effects on rule-based and information-integration category learning.

    W. Todd Maddox;F. Gregory Ashby;Corey J. Bohil

  • Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization

    W. Todd Maddox;F. Gregory Ashby

  • Human category learning 2.0

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox

  • Dissociating explicit and procedural-learning based systems of perceptual category learning

    W.Todd Maddox;F.Gregory Ashby

  • Observational versus feedback training in rule-based and information-integration category learning.

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox;Corey J. Bohil

  • Dual-Task Interference in Perceptual Category Learning

    Dagmar Zeithamova;W. Todd Maddox

  • Complex decision rules in categorization : contrasting novice and experienced performance

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox

  • A formal theory of feature binding in object perception

    F. Gregory Ashby;William Prinzmetal;Richard Ivry;W. Todd Maddox

  • Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait

    Brian D. Glass;W. Todd Maddox;Bradley C. Love

  • On the Dangers of Averaging Across Subjects When Using Multidimensional Scaling or the Similarity-Choice Model

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox;W. William Lee

  • Disrupting feedback processing interferes with rule-based but not information-integration category learning

    W. Todd Maddox;F. Gregory Ashby;A. David Ing;Alan D. Pickering

  • With Age Comes Wisdom Decision Making in Younger and Older Adults

    Darrell A. Worthy;Marissa A. Gorlick;Jennifer L. Pacheco;David M. Schnyer

  • A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification

    F. Gregory Ashby;W. Todd Maddox

  • Delayed feedback disrupts the procedural-learning system but not the hypothesis-testing system in perceptual category learning.

    W. Todd Maddox;A. David Ing

  • Choking and Excelling Under Pressure

    Arthur B. Markman;W. Todd Maddox;Darrell A. Worthy

  • Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance

    William Estes;W. Todd Maddox

  • Perceptual and decisional separability.

    W. Todd Maddox

  • Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation.

    Nathaniel J. Blanco;W. Todd Maddox;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Removing the Frontal Lobes The Effects of Engaging Executive Functions on Perceptual Category Learning

    J. Vincent Filoteo;J. Vincent Filoteo;J. Scott Lauritzen;W. Todd Maddox

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Vincent Filoteo
J. Vincent Filoteo University of California, San Diego
Arthur B. Markman
Arthur B. Markman The University of Texas at Austin
F. Gregory Ashby
F. Gregory Ashby University of California, Santa Barbara
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
Bradley C. Love
Bradley C. Love University College London
John E. McGeary
John E. McGeary Brown University
Christopher G. Beevers
Christopher G. Beevers The University of Texas at Austin
David M. Schnyer
David M. Schnyer The University of Texas at Austin
Timothy J Schallert
Timothy J Schallert The University of Texas at Austin
A. Ross Otto
A. Ross Otto McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up a range of career opportunities in counseling, research, education, and behavioral health. Many students begin their journey with a foundational best online psychology associates degree, which covers core psychological concepts and prepares graduates for entry-level positions or further study.

For those looking to advance quickly, the best 1 year master's in psychology online programs offer a fast-track pathway to specialized knowledge and higher-level roles. These programs are ideal for working professionals or those aiming to boost their qualifications efficiently.

Specialized areas, such as applied behavior analysis, also have dedicated online options. Choosing one of the top aba online degrees can lead to impactful roles working with individuals with behavioral challenges, including positions in schools, clinics, and research settings.

If your interests lie in school psychology, pursuing online school psychology programs nasp approved can qualify you for licensure and specialized positions in educational settings, with the assurance of high professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing W. Todd Maddox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles