World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hanspeter A. Mallot

Hanspeter A. Mallot

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7731
World Ranking
8791
National Ranking
439

Hanspeter A. Mallot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanspeter A. Mallot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 246 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hanspeter A. Mallot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hanspeter A. Mallot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hanspeter A. Mallot is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines, including neuroscience, computer science, and engineering, with a notable focus on cognitive neuroscience and its intersections with computational approaches.

Their work extensively covers topics related to memory and neural mechanisms, spatial cognition and navigation, and neural dynamics and brain function. Additional areas of research include visual perception and processing mechanisms, cognitive science and mapping, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and categorization, perception, and language.

Recent publications by Hanspeter A. Mallot include:

  • Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology, 2023, Psychological Research
  • Exploitation of image statistics with sparse coding in the case of stereo vision, 2020, Neural Networks
  • Gateway identity and spatial remapping in a combined grid and place cell attractor, 2022, Neural Networks
  • Metric information in cognitive maps: Euclidean embedding of non-Euclidean environments, 2023, PLoS Computational Biology
  • Gateway Identity and Spatial Remapping in a Combined Grid and Place Cell Attractor, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mallot include:

  • Tristan Baumann
  • Gerrit A. Ecke
  • Lilian LeVinh
  • Banafsheh Grochulla
  • Barbara Kaup

Publication venues where Mallot has contributed multiple works include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Psychological Research
  • Neural Networks
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Spatial Cognition and Computation

Hanspeter A. Mallot is also an author of a book published by The MIT Press titled From Geometry to Behavior (2023).

Best Publications

  • Integration of depth modules: stereo and shading

    Heinrich H. Bülthoff;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Inverse perspective mapping simplifies optical flow computation and obstacle detection

    Hanspeter A. Mallot;H. H. Bülthoff;J. J. Little;S. Bohrer

  • Biomimetic robot navigation

    Matthias O. Franz;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Navigation and Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in a Virtual Maze

    Sabine Gillner;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Miniature curved artificial compound eyes

    Dario Floreano;Ramon Pericet-Camara;Stéphane Viollet;Franck Ruffier

  • The Role of Global and Local Landmarks in Virtual Environment Navigation

    Sibylle D. Steck;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Where did I take that snapshot? Scene-based homing by image matching

    Matthias O. Franz;Bernhard Schölkopf;Hanspeter A. Mallot;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Learning View Graphs for Robot Navigation

    Matthias O. Franz;Bernhard Schölkopf;Hanspeter A. Mallot;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • "Fine-to-Coarse" Route Planning and Navigation in Regionalized Environments

    Jan Malte Wiener;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Rats are able to navigate in virtual environments.

    C. Hölscher;A. Schnee;H. Dahmen;L. Setia

  • View-Based Cognitive Mapping and Path Planning

    Bernhard Schölkopf;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Spatial Cognition: The Role of Landmark, Route, and Survey Knowledge in Human and Robot Navigation

    Steffen Werner;Bernd Krieg-Brückner;Hanspeter A. Mallot;Karin Schweizer

  • Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects.

    Eleni Papageorgiou;Gregor Hardiess;Frank Schaeffel;Horst Wiethoelter

  • Use and interaction of navigation strategies in regionalized environments

    Jan M. Wiener;Alexander Schnee;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Phase-based binocular vergence control and depth reconstruction using active vision

    Wolgang M. Theimer;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Route navigating without place recognition: what is recognised in recognition-triggered responses?

    Hanspeter A Mallot;Sabine Gillner

  • Graph-based models of space in architecture and cognitive science: a comparative analysis

    G Franz;HA Mallot;JM Wiener;Y.-T. Leong

  • Isovist analysis captures properties of space relevant for locomotion and experience.

    Jan M Wiener;Jan M Wiener;Gerald Franz;Nicole Rossmanith;Andreas Reichelt

  • Efficient visual homing based on Fourier transformed panoramic images

    Wolfgang Stürzl;Wolfgang Stürzl;Hanspeter A. Mallot

  • Neural mapping and space-variant image processing

    Hanspeter A. Mallot;Werner von Seelen;Fotios Giannakopoulos

  • Learning view graphs for robot navigation

    Matthias O. Franz;Bernhard Schölkopf;Philipp Georg;Hanspeter A. Mallot

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Rolf Ulrich
Rolf Ulrich University of Tübingen
Karl R. Gegenfurtner
Karl R. Gegenfurtner University of Giessen
Felix A. Wichmann
Felix A. Wichmann University of Tübingen
Bernhard Schölkopf
Bernhard Schölkopf Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems
Christian Hölscher
Christian Hölscher Henan University
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
Bernhard E. Riecke
Bernhard E. Riecke Simon Fraser University
Manfred Fahle
Manfred Fahle University of Bremen
Thomas Kammer
Thomas Kammer University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in the USA can open doors to diverse career opportunities beyond just computer science. Many students choose pathways in fields that align with their interests, skills, and salary expectations, while also considering the overall affordability of education.

For those looking at criminal justice, pursuing an affordable online criminal justice degree can be a cost-effective way to begin or advance a law enforcement career. Similarly, evaluating the cost of accounting degree online is essential for aspiring accountants seeking a solid financial foundation without significant student debt.

Data science continues to be one of the fastest-growing fields. An online masters in data science is a flexible option for working professionals aiming to upgrade their expertise in analytics, machine learning, and AI. Additionally, if your interests lean toward the building industry, the best online masters in construction management programs can help fast-track your progress into management roles within construction and engineering.

Online degrees are not just about convenience—they offer specialized, affordable options for career advancement in many in-demand sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Hanspeter A. Mallot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles