World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
67
Citations
11150
World Ranking
2945
National Ranking
1362

Wulf Paschen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wulf Paschen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 204 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wulf Paschen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wulf Paschen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wulf Paschen is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with particular attention to molecular biology, cell biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, physiology, and immunology.

The scientist's work spans multiple key topics including:

  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • RNA regulation and disease
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Galectins and Cancer Biology
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways

Paschen has contributed research papers published in several notable scientific journals. Selected recent papers include:

  • "PERK (Protein Kinase RNA-Like ER Kinase) Branch of the Unfolded Protein Response Confers Neuroprotection in Ischemic Stroke by Suppressing Protein Synthesis," 2020, Stroke
  • "Increasing O-GlcNAcylation is neuroprotective in young and aged brains after ischemic stroke," 2021, Experimental Neurology
  • "Small ubiquitin-like modifier 2 (SUMO2) is critical for memory processes in mice," 2020, The FASEB Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Yuntian Shen
  • Huaxin Sheng
  • Wei Yang
  • Xuan Li
  • Jingjun Lyu

Paschen has published work primarily in the following venues:

  • Stroke
  • Experimental Neurology
  • The FASEB Journal

The scientist's research integrates molecular mechanisms underlying neuroprotection and memory, with a particular focus on cellular stress responses such as unfolded protein response pathways and post-translational protein modifications. Their studies also explore the biological roles of glycosylation dynamics and ubiquitin-related processes, relevant to disease models including ischemic stroke and neurodegeneration.

Best Publications

  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress response and neurodegeneration.

    Wulf Paschen;Thorsten Mengesdorf

  • Endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction: a common denominator for cell injury in acute and degenerative diseases of the brain?

    Wulf Paschen;Aase Frandsen

  • Disturbances of the Functioning of Endoplasmic Reticulum: A Key Mechanism Underlying Neuronal Cell Injury?

    Wulf Paschen;Jens Doutheil

  • Endoplasmic reticulum stress.

    Gábor Bánhegyi;Peter Baumeister;Angelo Benedetti;Dezheng Dong

  • Endoplasmic reticulum: a primary target in various acute disorders and degenerative diseases of the brain.

    Wulf Paschen

  • Lactate and pH in the brain: association and dissociation in different pathophysiological states.

    W. Paschen;B. Djuricic;G. Mies;R. Schmidt-Kastner

  • SUMO2 is essential while SUMO3 is dispensable for mouse embryonic development

    Liangli Wang;Carolien Wansleeben;Shengli Zhao;Pei Miao

  • Regional changes of blood flow, glucose, and ATP content determined on brain sections during a single passage of spreading depression in rat brain cortex.

    G. Mies;W. Paschen

  • Dependence of vital cell function on endoplasmic reticulum calcium levels: implications for the mechanisms underlying neuronal cell injury in different pathological states.

    W. Paschen

  • Transient Global Cerebral Ischemia Induces a Massive Increase in Protein Sumoylation

    Wei Yang;Huaxin Sheng;David S Warner;Wulf Paschen

  • A modified four-vessel occlusion model for inducing incomplete forebrain ischemia in rats.

    R Schmidt-Kastner;W Paschen;B G Ophoff;K A Hossmann

  • Relationship between Calcium Accumulation and Recovery of Cat Brain after Prolonged Cerebral Ischemia

    K.-A. Hossmann;W. Paschen;L. Csiba

  • Transient Cerebral Ischemia Activates Processing of xbp1 Messenger RNA Indicative of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

    Wulf Paschen;Christoph Aufenberg;Svenja Hotop;Thorsten Mengesdorf

  • Polyamine changes in reversible cerebral ischemia.

    W. Paschen;R. Schmidt-Kastner;B. Djuricic;C. Meese

  • Activation of gadd153 expression through transient cerebral ischemia: evidence that ischemia causes endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction.

    Wulf Paschen;Cornelia Gissel;Thomas Linden;Sonja Althausen

  • SUMO2/3 Conjugation is an Endogenous Neuroprotective Mechanism:

    Anna Lena Datwyler;Gisela Lättig-Tünnemann;Wei Yang;Wulf Paschen;Wulf Paschen

  • Changes in the phosphorylation of initiation factor eIF‐2α, elongation factor eEF‐2 and p70 S6 kinase after transient focal cerebral ischaemia in mice

    Sonja Althausen;Thorsten Mengesdorf;Günter Mies;Laszlo Oláh

  • Disturbances of calcium homeostasis within the endoplasmic reticulum may contribute to the development of ischemic-cell damage

    W. Paschen

  • Shutdown of Translation: Lethal or Protective? Unfolded Protein Response versus Apoptosis:

    Wulf Paschen

  • A bioluminescence method for the demonstration of regional glucose distribution in brain slices.

    W. Paschen;I. Niebuhr;K.-A. Hossmann

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Warner
David S. Warner Duke University
Joachim Hallmayer
Joachim Hallmayer Stanford University
Ulrich Weser
Ulrich Weser University of Tübingen
Christopher G. Proud
Christopher G. Proud University of Adelaide
Christopher A. Ross
Christopher A. Ross Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
William C. Wetsel
William C. Wetsel Duke University
Bo K. Siesjö
Bo K. Siesjö Lund University
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Wolf-Dieter Heiss Max Planck Society
John M. Hallenbeck
John M. Hallenbeck National Institutes of Health
Ramona M. Rodriguiz
Ramona M. Rodriguiz Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, you might also consider related online degrees that expand your skills and open up diverse career paths in mental health and counseling. Many students pursue advanced studies in areas such as counseling, psychology, or marriage and family therapy to complement their neuroscience background.

Accreditation and affordability are key concerns when selecting a program. Accredited institutions, such as cacrep schools, ensure that your education meets high professional standards, which is essential if you plan to seek licensure. There are also highly ranked programs in online clinical mental health counseling for those wanting to specialize in therapy and client care.

For those passionate about helping families and couples, consider a marriage and family therapy degree online. Additionally, advancing your expertise with a masters in psychology online can boost your credentials and unlock more career opportunities in clinical, academic, and research settings.

These online degrees offer flexibility and affordability, making them strong options for anyone interested in a dynamic career at the intersection of neuroscience, psychology, and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Wulf Paschen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles