World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Medicine
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 127 304 272 23 21 495 71103
Medicine 127 2796 2609 144 139 503 71277

Ulrich Dirnagl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ulrich Dirnagl between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ulrich Dirnagl published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 14.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2019. 20 of the 585 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2019. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 18 publications 1997: 22 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 37 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
1986 2025

585 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ulrich Dirnagl: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 5
1990 7
1991 2
1992 6
1993 16
1994 6
1995 10
1996 18
1997 22
1998 14
1999 13
2000 23
2001 18
2002 19
2003 19
2004 19
2005 22
2006 19
2007 9
2008 21
2009 19
2010 21
2011 16
2012 13
2013 17
2014 13
2015 16
2016 23
2017 15
2018 21
2019 37
2020 22
2021 9
2022 24
2023 9
2024 10
2025 10
Total 585
Download as CSV

Ulrich Dirnagl publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Dirnagl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 488–497 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 495 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30 495
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Ulrich Dirnagl D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Dirnagl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 126–127 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16 127
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Germany Leader Award
  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Ulrich Dirnagl is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily lies within the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on several subfields including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Neurology, Small Animals, and General Health Professions.

The main topics covered in Dirnagl's work include:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health and Medical Research Impacts
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

Ulrich Dirnagl has contributed extensively to academic literature, with key recent publications addressing guidelines and reporting standards for animal research. Notable papers include:

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research, 2020, published in PLoS Biology
  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research, 2020, published in Experimental Physiology
  • Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0, 2020, published in PLoS Biology
  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*, 2020, published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research, 2020, published in British Journal of Pharmacology

Frequent collaborators in their research include Matthias Endres, Malcolm Macleod, Philipp Boehm-Sturm, Susanne Mueller, and Christoph Harms.

Publications by Dirnagl have appeared predominantly in several key venues, reflecting the scope of their research interests. These publication venues include:

  • PLoS Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • BMJ Open Science

Ulrich Dirnagl received recognition as a Member of Academia Europaea in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view

    Ulrich Dirnagl;Costantino Iadecola;Michael A. Moskowitz

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Viki Hurst;Amrita Ahluwalia;Sabina Alam

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

    Unknown

  • Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Amrita Ahluwalia;Sabina Alam;Marc T. Avey

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research

    Unknown

  • Near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) : a new tool to study hemodynamic changes during activation of brain function in human adults

    Arno Villringer;J. Planck;C. Hock;L. Schleinkofer

  • Stroke-induced immunodeficiency promotes spontaneous bacterial infections and is mediated by sympathetic activation reversal by poststroke T helper cell type 1-like immunostimulation.

    Konstantin Prass;Christian Meisel;Conny Höflich;Johann Braun

  • Neuroprotection in acute stroke: targeting excitotoxicity, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and inflammation

    Ángel Chamorro;Ulrich Dirnagl;Ulrich Dirnagl;Xabier Urra;Anna M Planas

  • Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome

    Christian Meisel;Jan M. Schwab;Jan M. Schwab;Jan M. Schwab;Konstantin Prass;Andreas Meisel

  • Ischemic tolerance and endogenous neuroprotection

    Ulrich Dirnagl;Roger P. Simon;John M. Hallenbeck

  • Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste

    Malcolm R. Macleod;Susan Michie;Ian Roberts;Ulrich Dirnagl

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2019: updated guidelines for reporting animal research

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Viki Hurst;Amrita Ahluwalia;Sabina Alam

  • Coupling of brain activity and cerebral blood flow: basis of functional neuroimaging.

    Arno Villringer;U. Dirnagl

  • Targeting gene-modified hematopoietic cells to the central nervous system: Use of green fluorescent protein uncovers microglial engraftment

    Josef Priller;Alexander FLüGEL;T. I. M. Wehner;Matthias Boentert

  • Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use

    Ulrich Dirnagl;Kyra Becker;Andreas Meisel

  • Stroke-Induced Immunodepression Experimental Evidence and Clinical Relevance

    Ulrich Dirnagl;Juliane Klehmet;Johann S. Braun;Hendrik Harms

  • Estrogen Increases Bone Marrow–Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cell Production and Diminishes Neointima Formation

    Kerstin Strehlow;Nikos Werner;Jan Berweiler;Andreas Link

  • Erythropoietin Is a Paracrine Mediator of Ischemic Tolerance in the Brain: Evidence from an In Vitro Model

    Karsten Ruscher;Dorette Freyer;Maria Karsch;Nikolai Isaev

  • Stroke and the immune system: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic strategies

    Richard Macrez;Carine Ali;Olivier Toutirais;Brigitte Le Mauff

  • Cortical spreading ischaemia is a novel process involved in ischaemic damage in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Jens P. Dreier;Sebastian Major;Andrew Manning;Johannes Woitzik

  • Vascular imprints of neuronal activity: Relationships between the dynamics of cortical blood flow, oxygenation, and volume changes following sensory stimulation

    Dov Malonek;Ulrich Dirnagl;Ute Lindauer;Katsuya Yamada

  • Bone Marrow–Derived Progenitor Cells Modulate Vascular Reendothelialization and Neointimal Formation: Effect of 3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibition

    Nikos Werner;Josef Priller;Ulrich Laufs;Matthias Endres

  • CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INJURYINDUCED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROME

    Christian Meisel;Jan M. Schwab;Konstantin Prass;Ulrich Dirnagl

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Meisel
Andreas Meisel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Arno Villringer
Arno Villringer Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Jens P. Dreier
Jens P. Dreier Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Matthias Endres
Matthias Endres Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Malcolm R. Macleod
Malcolm R. Macleod University of Edinburgh
Karen Gertz
Karen Gertz Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Karsten Ruscher
Karsten Ruscher Lund University
Hans-Dieter Volk
Hans-Dieter Volk Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Hellmuth Obrig
Hellmuth Obrig Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students may benefit from exploring a range of accelerated degree programs online. These programs offer a flexible and efficient way to earn a degree, allowing students to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner.

Neuroscience is closely linked with some of the highest paying degrees in the world due to its focus on science, technology, and healthcare. Majors such as biomedical engineering, pharmacology, and computer science often intersect with neuroscience and are featured among the college majors that make the most money. This practicality can be appealing for students looking to maximize their career prospects.

Financial considerations are crucial when pursuing higher education. Fortunately, there are many reputable accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, helping to make online neuroscience degrees more affordable and accessible. This broader accessibility ensures a diverse range of students can pursue dynamic careers in the neuroscience field.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Dirnagl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles