World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
124
Citations
56459
World Ranking
3231
National Ranking
1781

Neuroscience

D-Index
124
Citations
56379
World Ranking
338
National Ranking
203

Eng H. Lo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eng H. Lo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 615 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Eng H. Lo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eng H. Lo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 124 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eng H. Lo is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, neuroscience, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research spans multiple subfields including neurology, molecular biology, epidemiology, physiology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their main research topics include:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Circadian Rhythm and Melatonin
  • Barrier Structure and Function Studies

Eng H. Lo has published frequently in journals such as:

  • Stroke
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurology
  • Circulation Research

Notable recent papers by Eng H. Lo include:

  • Potential circadian effects on translational failure for neuroprotection, 2020, Nature
  • The future of neuroprotection in stroke, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Placental Mitochondria Therapy for Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Mice, 2020, Stroke
  • Association of ischemic stroke onset time with presenting severity, acute progression, and long-term outcome: A cohort study, 2022, PLoS Medicine
  • The neurovascular unit and systemic biology in stroke - implications for translation and treatment, 2022, Nature Reviews Neurology

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Ken Arai
  • Wenlu Li
  • MingMing Ning
  • Emiri T. Mandeville
  • Kazuhide Hayakawa

Best Publications

  • Mechanisms, challenges and opportunities in stroke

    Eng H. Lo;Turgay Dalkara;Michael A. Moskowitz

  • The Science of Stroke: Mechanisms in Search of Treatments

    Michael A. Moskowitz;Eng H. Lo;Costantino Iadecola

  • Update of the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable Preclinical Recommendations

    Marc Fisher;Marc Fisher;Giora Z. Feuerstein;David W. Howells;Patricia D. Hurn

  • Transfer of mitochondria from astrocytes to neurons after stroke

    Kazuhide Hayakawa;Elga Esposito;Xiaohua Wang;Xiaohua Wang;Yasukazu Terasaki

  • Effects of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Knock-Out on the Proteolysis of Blood–Brain Barrier and White Matter Components after Cerebral Ischemia

    Minoru Asahi;Xiaoying Wang;Tatsuro Mori;Toshihisa Sumii

  • Role for Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 after Focal Cerebral Ischemia: Effects of Gene Knockout and Enzyme Inhibition with BB-94:

    Minoru Asahi;Kazuko Asahi;Jae-Chang Jung;Gregory J. del Zoppo

  • Distinct roles of matrix metalloproteases in the early- and late-phase development of neuropathic pain

    Yasuhiko Kawasaki;Zhen Zhong Xu;Xiaoying Wang;Jong Yeon Park

  • Role of matrix metalloproteinases in delayed cortical responses after stroke.

    Bing-Qiao Zhao;Sophia Wang;Hahn-Young Kim;Hahn-Young Kim;Hannah Storrie

  • A new penumbra: transitioning from injury into repair after stroke

    Eng H Lo

  • MMP-9–Positive Neutrophil Infiltration Is Associated to Blood–Brain Barrier Breakdown and Basal Lamina Type IV Collagen Degradation During Hemorrhagic Transformation After Human Ischemic Stroke

    Anna Rosell;Eloy Cuadrado;Arantxa Ortega-Aznar;Mar Hernández-Guillamon

  • Cortical spreading depression activates and upregulates MMP-9

    Yasemin Gursoy-Ozdemir;Jianhua Qiu;Norihiro Matsuoka;Hayrunnisa Bolay

  • Involvement of Matrix Metalloproteinase in Thrombolysis-Associated Hemorrhagic Transformation After Embolic Focal Ischemia in Rats

    Toshihisa Sumii;Eng H. Lo

  • Increased Brain Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 After Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Human Stroke

    Anna Rosell;Arantxa Ortega-Aznar;José Alvarez-Sabín;Israel Fernández-Cadenas

  • Lipoprotein receptor-mediated induction of matrix metalloproteinase by tissue plasminogen activator.

    Xiaoying Wang;Sun-Ryung Lee;Ken Arai;Seong-Ryong Lee

  • Pathophysiologic cascades in ischemic stroke.

    Changhong Xing;Ken Arai;Eng H. Lo;Marc Hommel

  • Stroke: Working toward a prioritized world agenda

    Vladimir Hachinski;Geoffrey A. Donnan;Philip B. Gorelick;Werner Hacke

  • Evidence for Apoptosis After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rat Striatum

    Kohji Matsushita;Wei Meng;Xiaoying Wang;Minoru Asahi

  • Two-photon high-resolution measurement of partial pressure of oxygen in cerebral vasculature and tissue

    Sava Sakadžić;Emmanuel Roussakis;Mohammad A Yaseen;Emiri T Mandeville

  • Junctional complexes of the blood–brain barrier: permeability changes in neuroinflammation

    Margaret A Petty;Eng H Lo

  • Effects of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Gene Knock-Out on Morphological and Motor Outcomes after Traumatic Brain Injury

    Xiaoying Wang;JaeChang Jung;Minoru Asahi;Wilson Chwang

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Moskowitz
Michael A. Moskowitz Harvard University
David A. Boas
David A. Boas Boston University
Kyu-Won Kim
Kyu-Won Kim Seoul National University
Aneesh B. Singhal
Aneesh B. Singhal Massachusetts General Hospital
Anna Devor
Anna Devor Boston University
Igor F. Palacios
Igor F. Palacios Harvard University
Cenk Ayata
Cenk Ayata Harvard University
Karen L. Furie
Karen L. Furie Brown University
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Ona Wu
Ona Wu Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a variety of related educational and professional pathways. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider degrees in biology, psychology, or biomedical engineering—fields that are recognized as majors that make the most money. These areas often offer strong salary potential and wide-ranging job opportunities.

For those seeking flexibility, affordable options are available. A growing number of cheapest online colleges that accept FAFSA help students minimize debt while pursuing high-quality degrees. Many of these institutions also offer accelerated or asynchronous programs for busy learners.

Beyond full degrees, students may boost their skills and job prospects with certifications online in related disciplines such as data analysis, bioinformatics, or health sciences. These certifications can lead to specialized roles or complement your neuroscience knowledge.

If you’re searching for an accessible way to enter the field, consider browsing the easiest online college degrees and majors to determine a pathway that matches your interests and academic strengths.

Best Scientists Citing Eng H. Lo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles