World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
126
Citations
56777
World Ranking
2971
National Ranking
1645

Neuroscience

D-Index
123
Citations
53930
World Ranking
352
National Ranking
212

David A. Boas publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Boas sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 651 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David A. Boas D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Boas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 123 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - OSA Fellows David Boas Boston Univ., USA For pioneering advances in biomedical optics, including developments in functional NIR spectroscopy, innovations in laser speckle-contrast imaging, and two-photon imaging of oxygen partial pressure using a novel molecular indicator.
  • 2017 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)
  • 2017 - SPIE Fellow

Overview

David A. Boas is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research spans a range of areas within medicine and engineering, with a particular focus on biomedical optics and imaging techniques. The scientist has contributed extensively to fields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, biomedical engineering, biophysics, cognitive neuroscience, and neurology.

The main subjects of their research include optical imaging and spectroscopy techniques, photoacoustic and ultrasonic imaging, advanced fluorescence microscopy techniques, and optical coherence tomography applications. Additional topics cover non-invasive vital sign monitoring, thermoregulation and physiological responses, as well as cell image analysis techniques.

David A. Boas has published papers in notable venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurophotonics
  • Biomedical Optics Express
  • Biophotonics Congress: Biomedical Optics 2020 (Translational, Microscopy, OCT, OTS, BRAIN)
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism

Recent publications from this scientist include:

  • Best practices for fNIRS publications, 2021, Neurophotonics
  • Optical imaging and spectroscopy for the study of the human brain: status report, 2022, Neurophotonics
  • Dynamic light scattering imaging, 2020, Science Advances
  • Dynamic capillary stalls in reperfused ischemic penumbra contribute to injury: A hyperacute role for neutrophils in persistent traffic jams, 2020, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • Using the General Linear Model to Improve Performance in fNIRS Single Trial Analysis and Classification: A Perspective, 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Frequent collaborators of David A. Boas include Sreekanth Kura, Meryem A. Yücel, Kıvılcım Kılıç, Sava Sakadžić, and Xiaojun Cheng.

The scientist has been recognized by their professional community through several awards. They were named an OSA Fellow in 2018 for advances in biomedical optics including functional near-infrared spectroscopy, laser speckle-contrast imaging, and two-photon imaging of oxygen partial pressure. In 2017, they became a SPIE Fellow and also a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE).

Best Publications

  • HomER: a review of time-series analysis methods for near-infrared spectroscopy of the brain.

    Theodore J. Huppert;Solomon G. Diamond;Maria A. Franceschini;David A. Boas

  • A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation.

    Gary Strangman;Gary Strangman;Joseph P. Culver;John H. Thompson;David A. Boas

  • Intrinsic brain activity triggers trigeminal meningeal afferents in a migraine model

    Hayrunnisa Bolay;Uwe Reuter;Andrew K Dunn;Zhihong Huang

  • Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics

    David A. Boas;Andrew K. Dunn

  • Non-invasive neuroimaging using near-infrared light

    Gary Strangman;Gary Strangman;David A Boas;Jeffrey P Sutton

  • Monte Carlo simulation of photon migration in 3D turbid media accelerated by graphics processing units.

    Qianqian Fang;David A. Boas

  • Dynamic Imaging of Cerebral Blood Flow Using Laser Speckle

    Andrew K. Dunn;Hayrunnisa Bolay;Michael A. Moskowitz;David A. Boas

  • Imaging the body with diffuse optical tomography

    D.A. Boas;D.H. Brooks;E.L. Miller;C.A. DiMarzio

  • A temporal comparison of BOLD, ASL, and NIRS hemodynamic responses to motor stimuli in adult humans

    Theodore J. Huppert;Richard D. Hoge;Solomon Gilbert Diamond;Maria Angela Franceschini

  • Diffuse optical imaging of brain activation: approaches to optimizing image sensitivity, resolution, and accuracy.

    David A. Boas;Anders M. Dale;Maria Angela Franceschini

  • Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images

    Qianqian Fang;David A. Boas

  • Three dimensional Monte Carlo code for photon migration through complex heterogeneous media including the adult human head

    David A. Boas;J. P. Culver;J. J. Stott;A. K. Dunn

  • Spatially varying dynamical properties of turbid media probed with diffusing temporal light correlation

    D. A. Boas;A. G. Yodh

  • Factors affecting the accuracy of near-infrared spectroscopy concentration calculations for focal changes in oxygenation parameters.

    Gary Strangman;Maria Angela Franceschini;Maria Angela Franceschini;David A. Boas

  • Experimental images of heterogeneous turbid media by frequency-domain diffusing-photon tomography.

    M. A. O’Leary;D. A. Boas;B. Chance;A. G. Yodh

  • Motion artifacts in functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a comparison of motion correction techniques applied to real cognitive data.

    Sabrina Brigadoi;Lisa Ceccherini;Simone Cutini;Fabio Scarpa

  • Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: introduction for the special issue.

    David A. Boas;Clare E. Elwell;Marco Ferrari;Gentaro Taga

  • The Accuracy of Near Infrared Spectroscopy and Imaging during Focal Changes in Cerebral Hemodynamics

    David A. Boas;Tom Gaudette;Gary Strangman;Xuefeng Cheng

  • Two-photon high-resolution measurement of partial pressure of oxygen in cerebral vasculature and tissue

    Sava Sakadžić;Emmanuel Roussakis;Mohammad A Yaseen;Emiri T Mandeville

  • Pericyte degeneration leads to neurovascular uncoupling and limits oxygen supply to brain

    Kassandra Kisler;Amy R Nelson;Sanket V Rege;Anita Ramanathan

  • Coupling of total hemoglobin concentration, oxygenation, and neural activity in rat somatosensory cortex.

    Anna Devor;Andrew K. Dunn;Mark L. Andermann;Istvan Ulbert;Istvan Ulbert

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna Devor
Anna Devor Boston University
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Arjun G. Yodh
Arjun G. Yodh University of Pennsylvania
Theodore J. Huppert
Theodore J. Huppert University of Pittsburgh
Cenk Ayata
Cenk Ayata Harvard University
Eric L. Miller
Eric L. Miller Tufts University
Sergei A. Vinogradov
Sergei A. Vinogradov University of Pennsylvania
Britton Chance
Britton Chance University of Pennsylvania
Bruce Fischl
Bruce Fischl Harvard University
Daniel B. Kopans
Daniel B. Kopans Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience in the USA opens up a diverse range of career options, many of which are supported by graduate qualifications in related areas such as psychology, counseling, and therapy. For those interested in direct client work or mental health services, pursuing advanced degrees can be an effective pathway. Several universities now offer cacrep accredited schools online, providing flexible and recognized routes towards counseling careers.

Affordability is a crucial factor for many students. If budget is a concern, exploring the cheapest master's in counseling online can help minimize debt while still accessing quality education. Individuals considering family dynamics or relationship-based therapy may also investigate affordable online mft programs, which are ideal for those planning a specialization in marriage and family therapy.

For those leaning toward research, academia, or broader mental health roles, a degree in psychology could be the next step. Curious about expenses? Discover how much is a master's degree in psychology to plan your next move wisely. These related programs can expand your knowledge, skill set, and employment opportunities in the evolving field of neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing David A. Boas

Trending Scientists