World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 40 8046 7430 675 642 106 7297

Karen Gertz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Karen Gertz between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Karen Gertz published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2008. 7 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2008. 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 2 publications
2000 2026

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Karen Gertz: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 4
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 6
2006 4
2007 4
2008 13
2009 3
2010 4
2011 4
2012 5
2013 5
2014 3
2015 6
2016 5
2017 8
2018 5
2019 5
2020 4
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 0
2025 5
2026 2
Total 115
Download as CSV

Karen Gertz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Gertz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539 106
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Karen Gertz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Gertz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 40
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Atorvastatin Upregulates Type III Nitric Oxide Synthase in Thrombocytes, Decreases Platelet Activation, and Protects From Cerebral Ischemia in Normocholesterolemic Mice

    Ulrich Laufs;Karen Gertz;Paul Huang;Georg Nickenig

  • Mechanisms of stroke protection by physical activity

    Matthias Endres;Karen Gertz;Ute Lindauer;Juri Katchanov

  • Rosuvastatin, a new HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, upregulates endothelial nitric oxide synthase and protects from ischemic stroke in mice.

    Ulrich Laufs;Karen Gertz;Ulrich Dirnagl;Michael Böhm

  • Suppression of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Production After Withdrawal of Statin Treatment Is Mediated by Negative Feedback Regulation of Rho GTPase Gene Transcription

    Ulrich Laufs;Matthias Endres;Florian Custodis;Karen Gertz

  • CNS Myelin Wrapping Is Driven by Actin Disassembly

    J. Bradley Zuchero;Meng-meng Fu;Steven A. Sloan;Adiljan Ibrahim

  • Protective effects of PJ34, a novel, potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) in in vitro and in vivo models of stroke.

    Galaleldin E. Abdelkarim;Karen Gertz;Christoph Harms;Juri Katchanov

  • Physical Activity Improves Long-Term Stroke Outcome via Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase–Dependent Augmentation of Neovascularization and Cerebral Blood Flow

    Karen Gertz;Josef Priller;Golo Kronenberg;Klaus B. Fink

  • Mild cerebral ischemia induces loss of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors and activation of cell cycle machinery before delayed neuronal cell death.

    Juri Katchanov;Christoph Harms;Karen Gertz;Ludger Hauck

  • Vascular Effects of Diet Supplementation With Plant Sterols

    Oliver Weingärtner;Dieter Lütjohann;Shengbo Ji;Nicole Weisshoff

  • Essential role of interleukin-6 in post-stroke angiogenesis.

    Karen Gertz;Golo Kronenberg;Roland E. Kälin;Tina Baldinger

  • Withdrawal of statin treatment abrogates stroke protection in mice

    Karen Gertz;Ulrich Laufs;Ute Lindauer;Georg Nickenig

  • Post-traumatic stress disorder and beyond: an overview of rodent stress models.

    Johanna Schöner;Andreas Heinz;Matthias Endres;Karen Gertz

  • Exofocal Dopaminergic Degeneration as Antidepressant Target in Mouse Model of Poststroke Depression

    Golo Kronenberg;Mustafa Balkaya;Vincent Prinz;Karen Gertz

  • Intravenous Rosuvastatin for Acute Stroke Treatment An Animal Study

    Vincent Prinz;Ulrich Laufs;Karen Gertz;Golo Kronenberg

  • Protein kinase CK2 links extracellular growth factor signaling with the control of p27 Kip1 stability in the heart

    Ludger Hauck;Christoph Harms;Junfeng An;Jens Rohne

  • Inhibition of histone deacetylation protects wildtype but not gelsolin-deficient mice from ischemic brain injury.

    Ferah Yildirim;Karen Gertz;Golo Kronenberg;Christoph Harms

  • Hyperbaric oxygenation induced tolerance against focal cerebral ischemia in mice is strain dependent.

    Konstantin Prass;Frank Wiegand;Pascale Schumann;Melanie Ahrens

  • Folate Deficiency Induces Neurodegeneration and Brain Dysfunction in Mice Lacking Uracil DNA Glycosylase

    Golo Kronenberg;Christoph Harms;Robert W. Sobol;Fernando Cardozo-Pelaez

  • Characterization of long-term functional outcome in a murine model of mild brain ischemia.

    Mustafa Balkaya;Jan Kröber;Karen Gertz;Sarah Peruzzaro

  • The ectonucleotidase cd39/ENTPDase1 modulates purinergic-mediated microglial migration.

    Katrin Färber;Sören Markworth;Ulrike Pannasch;Christiane Nolte

  • Selective neuronal vulnerability following mild focal brain ischemia in the mouse.

    Juri Katchanov;Christian Waeber;Karen Gertz;Andrea Gietz

Frequent Co-Authors

Golo Kronenberg
Golo Kronenberg University of Leicester
Matthias Endres
Matthias Endres Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ulrich Dirnagl
Ulrich Dirnagl Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Ulrich Laufs
Ulrich Laufs Saarland University
Helmut Kettenmann
Helmut Kettenmann Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Georg Nickenig
Georg Nickenig University of Bonn
Michael Böhm
Michael Böhm Saarland University
Isabella Heuser
Isabella Heuser Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Gerd Kempermann
Gerd Kempermann German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open doors to a wide range of career opportunities, both within clinical and research settings and in allied mental health fields. If you’re interested in exploring related disciplines, there are several flexible and affordable degree options available online.

For those drawn to helping families or couples navigate mental and emotional challenges, a masters in marriage and family therapy online provides specialized training in therapeutic techniques and client care. Psychology is another closely related field, offering diverse career paths; you can find a masters in psychology online cheap to deepen clinical and research skills without breaking the bank, or opt for the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology as a starting point.

Social work is another pathway that intersects with neuroscience, particularly in community and healthcare settings. If accessibility and straightforward admissions are your priority, you may prefer options like the easiest msw programs to get into. Each of these degrees can complement a neuroscience background, providing versatile career choices in mental health, counseling, research, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Gertz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles