World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
19872
World Ranking
4890
National Ranking
2692

Robert Kurzban publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Kurzban sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 114 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert Kurzban D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Kurzban sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Kurzban is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including neuroscience and psychology, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience and social psychology as subfields of study.

The scientist's work covers several key topics within these disciplines, notably:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior

Recent scholarly contributions include a paper titled Moralistic punishment is not for cooperation, published in 2023 in the journal Behavioral and Brain Sciences. This paper has received citations and represents ongoing engagement with themes related to moral behavior and social cooperation.

Collaborations with other researchers are part of their academic activity, with frequent co-authorship alongside Peter DeScioli. This collaborative relationship has contributed to research outputs intersecting psychology and behavioral sciences.

Publication venues for Kurzban's work include:

  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences

The scientist's research incorporates a multidisciplinary approach, integrating findings from social psychology and cognitive neuroscience to explore complex questions about human moral reasoning, emotional processes related to judgment, and concepts of free will and agency.

Best Publications

  • Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion.

    Robert Kurzban;Mark R. Leary

  • An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance.

    Robert Kurzban;Angela Lee Duckworth;Joseph W Kable;Justus Myers

  • Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization

    Robert Kurzban;John Tooby;Leda Cosmides

  • Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate

    H. Clark Barrett;Robert Kurzban

  • Disgust: Evolved Function and Structure

    Joshua M. Tybur;Debra Lieberman;Robert Kurzban;Peter DeScioli

  • Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness.

    Paul J. Zak;Robert Kurzban;William T. Matzner

  • Experiments investigating cooperative types in humans: A complement to evolutionary theory and simulations

    Robert Kurzban;Daniel Houser

  • Why Everyone (Else) Is a Hypocrite: Evolution and the Modular Mind

    Robert Kurzban

  • Perceptions of race.

    Leda Cosmides;John Tooby;Robert Kurzban

  • Audience effects on moralistic punishment

    Robert Kurzban;Peter DeScioli;Erin O'Brien

  • HurryDate: Mate preferences in action

    Robert Kurzban;Jason Weeden

  • Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.

    Michael E. McCullough;Robert Kurzban;Benjamin A. Tabak

  • The Neurobiology of Trust

    Paul J. Zak;Paul J. Zak;Robert Kurzban;William T. Matzner

  • Does the Brain Consume Additional Glucose during Self-Control Tasks?

    Robert Kurzban

  • The Evolution of Altruism in Humans

    Robert Kurzban;Maxwell N. Burton-Chellew;Stuart A. West

  • A solution to the mysteries of morality.

    Peter DeScioli;Robert Kurzban

  • Mysteries of morality

    Peter DeScioli;Robert Kurzban

  • Testosterone administration decreases generosity in the ultimatum game.

    Paul J. Zak;Robert Kurzban;Sheila Ahmadi;Ronald S. Swerdloff

  • Revisiting Kindness and Confusion in Public Goods Experiments

    Daniel Houser;Robert Kurzban

  • Evolutionary theory and psychopathy

    Andrea L. Glenn;Robert Kurzban;Adrian Raine

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Robinson
Paul H. Robinson University of Pennsylvania
Daniel Houser
Daniel Houser George Mason University
Michael E. McCullough
Michael E. McCullough University of California, San Diego
Paul J. Zak
Paul J. Zak Claremont Graduate University
Debra Lieberman
Debra Lieberman University of Miami
Lee A. Kirkpatrick
Lee A. Kirkpatrick William & Mary
Joseph W. Kable
Joseph W. Kable University of Pennsylvania
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Daniel M. T. Fessler University of California, Los Angeles
Kevin McCabe
Kevin McCabe George Mason University
John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology offers a solid foundation for various rewarding careers. Many students interested in human behavior or mental health explore related online degrees, such as social work, counseling, or behavioral science. These fields often intersect with psychology and provide pathways into support and advocacy roles that make a positive impact on communities.

Social work is a particularly popular career choice for psychology graduates. Exploring how to become a social worker in Michigan can shed light on the educational and licensing steps required. Requirements can vary by state, so it’s essential to review the specific steps, such as how to become a social worker in Minnesota or learning more about becoming a social worker in Mississippi.

Each state sets its own rules for social work licensure, coursework, and supervised practice. For example, the Missouri social work license requirements explain in detail the process for entering the profession locally. Understanding these pathways will help you choose the best online degree program and meet professional goals in psychology-related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Kurzban

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles