World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Lee A. Kirkpatrick

Lee A. Kirkpatrick

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
14878
World Ranking
7377
National Ranking
3981

Lee A. Kirkpatrick publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee A. Kirkpatrick sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lee A. Kirkpatrick D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lee A. Kirkpatrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lee A. Kirkpatrick is affiliated with William & Mary in the United States.

This scientist's profile currently does not list any recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, books, or defined fields of study. There is also no information available regarding awards or specific research topics. The absence of documented publications and research topics suggests limited publicly accessible data at this time.

Despite this, Lee A. Kirkpatrick's association with an established institution like William & Mary implies involvement in academic research and scholarship, although specific details about their contributions or research interests are not currently provided.

Best Publications

  • Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: a longitudinal analysis.

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Keith E. Davis

  • Attachment, Evolution, and the Psychology of Religion

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • A Half Century of Mate Preferences: The Cultural Evolution of Values

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford;Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Randy J. Larsen

  • Two Dimensions of Attachment to God and Their Relation to Affect, Religiosity, and Personality Constructs

    Wade C. Rowatt;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Attachment Theory and Religion: Childhood Attachments, Religious Beliefs, and Conversion*

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Attachment styles and close relationships: A four‐year prospective study

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Cindy Hazan

  • Jealousy and the nature of beliefs about infidelity: Tests of competing hypotheses about sex differences in the United States, Korea, and Japan

    David M. Buss;Todd K. Shackelford;Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Jae C. Choe

  • An Attachment-Theoretical Approach to Romantic Love and Religious Belief

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Phillip R. Shaver

  • Intrinsic-Extrinsic Religious Orientation: The Boon or Bane of Contemporary Psychology of Religion?

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Ralph W. Hood

  • God as a Substitute Attachment Figure: A Longitudinal Study of Adult Attachment Style and Religious Change in College Students

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Predicting prejudice from religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism : a multiple-regression approach

    Brian Laythe;Deborah Finkel;L. E. E. A. Kirkpatrick

  • An Attachment-Theory Approach Psychology of Religion

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • A General Attribution Theory for the Psychology of Religion

    Bernard Spilka;Phillip R. Shaver;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Attachment and religious representations and behavior

    Pehr Granqvist;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • The functional domain specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression.

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Christian E. Waugh;Alelhie Valencia;Gregory D. Webster

  • Effects of adult attachment and presence of romantic partners on physiological responses to stress.

    Brooke C. Feeney;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Cognitive-experiential self-theory and subjective probability: further evidence for two conceptual systems.

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick;Seymour Epstein

  • Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes.

    Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality

    Jenée James Jackson;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

  • Religious Fundamentalism as a Predictor of Prejudice: A Two-Component Model

    Brian Laythe;Deborah G. FinkeL;Robert G. Bringle;Lee A. Kirkpatrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Brooke C. Feeney
Brooke C. Feeney Carnegie Mellon University
John B. Nezlek
John B. Nezlek University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Phillip R. Shaver
Phillip R. Shaver University of California, Davis
Gregory D. Webster
Gregory D. Webster University of Florida
Pehr Granqvist
Pehr Granqvist Stockholm University
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Angela D. Bryan
Angela D. Bryan University of Colorado Boulder
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Daniel M. T. Fessler University of California, Los Angeles
Robert Kurzban
Robert Kurzban University of Pennsylvania
Peter K. Jonason
Peter K. Jonason VIZJA University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology can open many doors to diverse career opportunities, especially in the field of social work. Educational requirements for social workers vary by state, with most positions calling for at least a bachelor’s degree, and some requiring a master’s degree for advanced roles or clinical practice.

For example, to meet the South Carolina minimum degree requirement for social workers, you must have at least a bachelor’s degree in social work (BSW). In South Dakota minimum degree requirement for social workers is also typically a BSW, with a master’s degree (MSW) needed for higher-level roles.

In Tennessee, social worker education requirements in Tennessee state that a BSW suffices for entry-level licensing, but an MSW is essential for clinical and specialized positions. Similarly, in Texas, the degree needed to be a social worker in Texas is a minimum of a BSW, while advanced careers require an MSW.

With flexible online programs now available, earning these credentials is more accessible than ever. Exploring your state’s unique requirements will help guide your path toward a rewarding career in social work or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Lee A. Kirkpatrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles