World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Efstathios Stamatatos

Efstathios Stamatatos

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
52
Citations
10990
World Ranking
5077
National Ranking
27

Efstathios Stamatatos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Efstathios Stamatatos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 130 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Efstathios Stamatatos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Efstathios Stamatatos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Efstathios Stamatatos is affiliated with the University of the Aegean in Greece. Their research spans a broad area of computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence and its intersections with social sciences.

They have a significant publication record with 57 works in computer science and 13 in social sciences. Within these, subfields of study emphasize artificial intelligence, sociology and political science, information systems, law, and social psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include authorship attribution and profiling, hate speech and cyberbullying detection, topic modeling, names, identity and discrimination research, spam and phishing detection, software engineering research, and misinformation and its impacts.

Frequent venues where their research has appeared include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Pattern Recognition Letters
  • Evolving Systems
  • The Classical World

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Stamatatos are:

  • Masking domain-specific information for cross-domain deception detection, 2020, Pattern Recognition Letters
  • The Importance of Suppressing Domain Style in Authorship Analysis, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • A transfer learning approach to cross-domain authorship attribution, 2021, Evolving Systems
  • The significance of user-defined identifiers in Java source code authorship identification, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Collaboration forms an important aspect of their work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Martin Potthast
  • Janek Bevendorff
  • Benno Stein
  • Mike Kestemont
  • Matti Wiegmann

The body of work reflects interdisciplinary engagement between computer science techniques and social science concerns, especially in the context of automated authorship analysis, online communication behaviors, and identity-based research areas.

Best Publications

  • A survey of modern authorship attribution methods

    Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Automatic text categorization in terms of genre and author

    Efstathios Stamatatos;George Kokkinakis;Nikos Fakotakis

  • A survey of modern authorship attribution methods

    Unknown

  • Syntactic N-grams as machine learning features for natural language processing

    Grigori Sidorov;Francisco Velasquez;Efstathios Stamatatos;Alexander Gelbukh

  • Computer-Based Authorship Attribution Without Lexical Measures

    Efstathios Stamatatos;Nikos Fakotakis;Georgios Kokkinakis

  • N-gram feature selection for authorship identification

    John Houvardas;Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Text genre detection using common word frequencies

    E. Stamatatos;N. Fakotakis;G. Kokkinakis

  • Overview of the 2nd Author Profiling Task at PAN 2014

    Francisco Rangel;Paolo Rosso;Moshe Moshe Koppel;Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Authorship Attribution for Social Media Forensics

    Anderson Rocha;Walter J. Scheirer;Christopher W. Forstall;Thiago Cavalcante

  • Author identification: Using text sampling to handle the class imbalance problem

    Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Overview of the author identification task at PAN 2014

    Efstathios Stamatatos;Walter Daelemans;Ben Verhoeven;Benno Stein

  • Intrinsic Plagiarism Detection Using Character n-gram Profiles

    Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Overview of the Author Identification Task at PAN 2015.

    Efstathios Stamatatos;Walter Daelemans;Ben Verhoeven;Patrick Juola

  • Identifying Authorship by Byte-Level N-Grams: The Source Code Author Profile (SCAP) Method.

    Georgia Frantzeskou;Efstathios Stamatatos;Stefanos Gritzalis;Carole E. Chaski

  • Plagiarism detection using stopword n -grams

    Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Improving the Reproducibility of PAN’s Shared Tasks:

    Martin Potthast;Tim Gollub;Francisco Rangel;Paolo Rosso

  • On the Robustness of Authorship Attribution Based on Character N -gram Features

    Efstathios Stamatatos

  • WORDS VERSUS CHARACTER N-GRAMS FOR ANTI-SPAM FILTERING

    Ioannis Kanaris;Konstantinos Kanaris;Ioannis Houvardas;Efstathios Stamatatos

  • Syntactic dependency-based n-grams as classification features

    Grigori Sidorov;Francisco Velasquez;Efstathios Stamatatos;Alexander Gelbukh

  • Effective identification of source code authors using byte-level information

    Georgia Frantzeskou;Efstathios Stamatatos;Stefanos Gritzalis;Sokratis Katsikas

  • Overview of the Author Identification Task at PAN-2017: Style Breach Detection and Author Clustering.

    Michael Tschuggnall;Efstathios Stamatatos;Ben Verhoeven;Walter Daelemans

Frequent Co-Authors

Benno Stein
Benno Stein Bauhaus University, Weimar
Martin Potthast
Martin Potthast Leipzig University
Paolo Rosso
Paolo Rosso Universitat Politècnica de València
Nikos Fakotakis
Nikos Fakotakis University of Patras
Walter Daelemans
Walter Daelemans University of Antwerp
Stefanos Gritzalis
Stefanos Gritzalis University of Piraeus
Stephen G. MacDonell
Stephen G. MacDonell Victoria University of Wellington
Moshe Koppel
Moshe Koppel Bar-Ilan University
Alexander Gelbukh
Alexander Gelbukh Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Manuel Montes-y-Gómez
Manuel Montes-y-Gómez National Institute of Astrophysics, Optics and Electronics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Computer Science also means exploring diverse online degree options and future professional pathways. For those seeking a quick academic route, pursuing the fastest degree to get can lead to lucrative careers within a short timeframe, especially in tech-related roles.

The tech industry is rapidly evolving, and specialized fields like artificial intelligence are in high demand. If your interest lies in this area, reviewing ai degree programs online can help you access some of the most affordable and competitive options available.

Choosing the right academic path is crucial. Referencing the best college degrees for the future can guide students toward disciplines that align with emerging job markets and long-term success.

For those ready to advance their education, there are easy masters programs available that offer flexibility and streamlined curricula. This enables working professionals to upskill while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Efstathios Stamatatos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles