World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter K. Jonason

Peter K. Jonason

Award Badge
Psychology
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2163 1967 2 2 278 19560

Peter K. Jonason publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter K. Jonason between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter K. Jonason published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 16.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2022. 51 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2022. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 28 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 28 publications
2006 2025

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter K. Jonason: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 4
2008 4
2009 12
2010 7
2011 7
2012 17
2013 14
2014 21
2015 23
2016 18
2017 19
2018 18
2019 19
2020 27
2021 23
2022 28
2023 21
2024 23
2025 28
Total 335
Download as CSV

Peter K. Jonason publications per year - data summary

  • Peter K. Jonason, a Psychology scholar from VIZJA University, has 335 publications recorded across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2006 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2022 and 2025, with 28 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2006, with 2 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 16.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.8 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 123 publications, 37% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2006-2012: 53 publications (7.6 per year); 2013-2019: 132 publications (18.9 per year); 2020-2025: 150 publications (25.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Peter K. Jonason publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Jonason sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 278 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 278
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter K. Jonason publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Peter K. Jonason, a Psychology scholar from VIZJA University, records 278 publications - the 85th percentile of the discipline.
  • 85% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Peter K. Jonason, and about 15% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Peter K. Jonason ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Peter K. Jonason D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter K. Jonason sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Peter K. Jonason D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Peter K. Jonason, a Psychology scholar from VIZJA University, records 71 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Peter K. Jonason, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Peter K. Jonason ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Peter K. Jonason is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology and social sciences, with a focus on multiple subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics such as personality traits and psychology, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, social and intergroup psychology, personality disorders and psychopathology, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, attachment and relationship dynamics, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Jonason's recent publications include:

  • "Who complies with the restrictions to reduce the spread of COVID-19?: Personality and perceptions of the COVID-19 situation" (2020) in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Adaptive and maladaptive behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of Dark Triad traits, collective narcissism, and health beliefs" (2020) in Personality and Individual Differences
  • "Country-level correlates of the Dark Triad traits in 49 countries" (2020) in Journal of Personality
  • "Academic dishonesty among university students: The roles of the psychopathy, motivation, and self-efficacy" (2020) in PLoS ONE
  • "Considering sadism in the shadow of the Dark Triad traits: A meta-analytic review of the Dark Tetrad" (2022) in Personality and Individual Differences

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Jonason include:

  • Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska
  • Jarosław Piotrowski
  • Artur Sawicki
  • Constantine Sedikides
  • Marcin Zajenkowski

The majority of Jonason's papers have been published in known venues such as:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • PLoS ONE
  • Scientific Reports

The scientist's scholarly contributions span across 193 publications in psychology and 60 in social sciences, indicating a broad engagement with both fields. Within subfields, the concentration is strongest in clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology, with a significant number of works also addressing sociology, political science, and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • The dirty dozen : a concise measure of the Dark Triad

    Peter K. Jonason;Gregory D. Webster

  • The dark triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men

    Peter K. Jonason;Norman P. Li;Gregory D. Webster;David P. Schmitt

  • The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way

    Peter K. Jonason;Sarah Slomski;Jamie Partyka

  • The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia

    Peter K. Jonason;Laura Krause

  • Living a Fast Life

    Peter K. Jonason;Bryan L. Koenig;Jeremy Tost

  • The Antihero in Popular Culture: Life History Theory and the Dark Triad Personality Traits

    Peter K. Jonason;Gregory D. Webster;David P. Schmitt;Norman P. Li

  • The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad : implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics

    Peter K. Jonason;Norman P. Li;David M. Buss

  • I just cannot control myself: The Dark Triad and self-control

    Peter K. Jonason;Jeremy Tost

  • A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics ☆

    Peter K. Jonason;Gregory D. Webster

  • How the Dark Triad traits predict relationship choices

    Peter K. Jonason;Victor X. Luevano;Heather M. Adams

  • Who is James Bond? : the Dark Triad as an agentic social style

    Peter K Jonason;Norman P Li;Emily A Teicher

  • Different routes to limited empathy in the sexes: Examining the links between the Dark Triad and empathy

    Peter K. Jonason;Minna Lyons;Emily J. Bethell;Rahael Ross

  • Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment

    Peter K. Jonason;Katherine A. Valentine;Norman P. Li;Carmelita L. Harbeson

  • The dark side of love: Love styles and the Dark Triad

    Peter K Jonason;Phillip S Kavanagh

  • The Brief Aggression Questionnaire: Psychometric and Behavioral Evidence for an Efficient Measure of Trait Aggression

    Gregory D. Webster;C. Nathan DeWall;Richard S. Pond;Timothy Deckman

  • Valuing myself over others : the Dark Triad traits and moral and social values

    Peter K. Jonason;Garrett L. Strosser;Christopher H. Kroll;Jasper J. Duineveld

  • Trolling on Tinder® (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity

    Evita March;Rachel Grieve;Jessica Marrington;Peter K Jonason

  • What a tangled web we weave: The Dark Triad traits and deception

    Peter K. Jonason;Minna Lyons;Holly M. Baughman;Philip A. Vernon

Frequent Co-Authors

Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University
Gregory D. Webster
Gregory D. Webster University of Florida
David P. Schmitt
David P. Schmitt Kansas State University
Minna Lyons
Minna Lyons Liverpool John Moores University
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia
Valdiney Veloso Gouveia Federal University of Paraíba
Joshua D. Foster
Joshua D. Foster University of South Alabama
Virgil Zeigler-Hill
Virgil Zeigler-Hill Oakland University
Lorne Campbell
Lorne Campbell University of Western Ontario
Arthur Aron
Arthur Aron Stony Brook University
W. Keith Campbell
W. Keith Campbell University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and career pathways. One growing field is substance abuse counseling, where qualified professionals are in high demand across the United States. Programs in psychology often lead to careers that support individuals struggling with addiction, offering specialized roles in different cities and states.

If you're interested in working in the field, it's important to understand the education and certification requirements, which can differ by location. For example, Richmond substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, learning about the Riverside substance abuse counselor certification requirements is essential for those considering a career in California.

Prospective counselors should also review region-specific guidelines, such as how to become a substance abuse counselor in Sacramento or how to become a substance abuse counselor in Saint Paul. These resources detail the licensing, education paths, and ethical standards required to work in each area. By researching these local qualifications, students can better plan their educational journey and future career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Peter K. Jonason

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles