World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
72
Citations
21407
World Ranking
2047
National Ranking
118

Donald H. Saklofske publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald H. Saklofske sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 443 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donald H. Saklofske D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald H. Saklofske sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald H. Saklofske is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology with a focus on several specialized areas. Their research output encompasses a wide range of topics and has been published in various notable academic venues.

Their main field of study is psychology, with a strong emphasis on the following subfields:

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Key research topics associated with Saklofske's work include:

  • Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Humor Studies and Applications
  • Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being

Their publications have appeared most frequently in these venues:

  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • European Journal of Psychological Assessment
  • Current Psychology
  • Journal of Personality Assessment

Recent papers authored by or related to their research include:

  • The relationship of compassion and self-compassion with personality and emotional intelligence, 2020, Personality and Individual Differences
  • The operating characteristics of the nonparametric Levene test for equal variances with assessment and evaluation data, 2020, Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Dark triads, tetrads, tents, and cores: Why navigate (research) the jungle of dark personality models without a compass (criterion)?, 2021, Acta Psychologica
  • Mediators of IQ test score differences across racial and ethnic groups: The case for environmental and social justice, 2020, Personality and Individual Differences
  • Rapid and sound assessment of well-being within a multi-dimensional approach: The Well-being Numerical Rating Scales (WB-NRSs), 2021, PLoS ONE

Saklofske has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Chloé Lau
  • Francesca Chiesi
  • Rachel A. Plouffe
  • Claire A. Wilson
  • Christopher Marcin Kowalski

Best Publications

  • Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Donald H. Saklofske;Vincent Egan

  • Factor structure and validity of a trait emotional intelligence measure

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Paul S. Minski

  • Toward an Integration of Subjective Well-Being and Psychopathology

    Peter J. Greenspoon;Donald H. Saklofske

  • Personality and Individual Differences

    Unknown

  • International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence

    Donald H. Saklofske;Moshe Zeidner

  • Adaptive and maladaptive coping.

    Moshe Zeidner;Donald Saklofske

  • Measurement of trait emotional intelligence: testing and cross-validating a modified version of Schutte et al.'s (1998) measure

    Elizabeth J Austin;Donald H Saklofske;Sandra H.S Huang;Deanne McKenney

  • The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment

    Elizabeth Austin;J. D. A. Parker;K. V. Petrides;D. H. Saklofske

  • Individual difference correlates of health-related behaviours: Preliminary evidence for links between emotional intelligence and coping.

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Josie Galloway;Kammy Davidson

  • Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: Different patterns of association for stress and success

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Sarah M. Mastoras;Laura Beaton

  • The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Volume 2 — Personality measurement and testing

    Gregory J Boyle;Gerald Matthews;Donald H. Saklofske

  • Comparing ability and self-report trait emotional intelligence, fluid intelligence, and personality traits in career decision

    Annamaria Di Fabio;Donald H. Saklofske

  • The perniciousness of perfectionism: A meta-analytic review of the perfectionism-suicide relationship.

    Martin M. Smith;Simon B. Sherry;Samantha Chen;Donald H. Saklofske

  • EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeing

    Ashley K. Vesely;Donald H. Saklofske;David W. Nordstokke

  • Teachers--the vital resource the contribution of emotional intelligence to teacher efficacy and well-being

    Ashley K. Vesely;Donald H. Saklofske;Alan D. W. Leschied

  • Measures of personality and social psychological constructs

    Gregory John Boyle;Donald H. Saklofske;Gerald Matthews

  • The Assessment of Sadistic Personality: Preliminary psychometric evidence for a new measure

    Rachel A. Plouffe;Donald H. Saklofske;Martin M. Smith

  • Are perfectionism dimensions vulnerability factors for depressive symptoms after controlling for neuroticism? A meta‐analysis of 10 longitudinal studies.

    Martin M. Smith;Simon B. Sherry;Katerina Rnic;Donald H. Saklofske

  • The Big Three Perfectionism Scale A New Measure of Perfectionism

    Martin M. Smith;Donald H. Saklofske;Joachim Stoeber;Simon B. Sherry

  • Promoting individual resources: The challenge of trait emotional intelligence

    Annamaria Di Fabio;Donald H. Saklofske

  • WISC-IV Clinical Use and Interpretation : Scientist-Practitioner Perspectives

    Aurelio Prifetera;Don Saklofske

  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition

    Lawrence G. Weiss;Victoria Locke;Tianshu Pan;Jossette G. Harris

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
Elizabeth J. Austin
Elizabeth J. Austin University of Edinburgh
Gregory J. Boyle
Gregory J. Boyle University of Melbourne
Annamaria Di Fabio
Annamaria Di Fabio University of Florence
James D. A. Parker
James D. A. Parker Trent University
Con Stough
Con Stough Swinburne University of Technology
Paul F. Tremblay
Paul F. Tremblay University of Western Ontario
Moshe Zeidner
Moshe Zeidner University of Haifa
Joachim Stoeber
Joachim Stoeber University of Kent
Gordon L. Flett
Gordon L. Flett York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career paths. Social work is a popular, rewarding option for those interested in making a difference in communities. Many universities now offer flexible, accredited online social work programs to help students gain essential skills while accommodating other commitments.

Choosing the right program is key. Students may look into the top social work programs in the Midwest for a broad selection of reputable institutions. Those seeking region-specific training can consider the top social work programs in Minnesota or the top social work programs in Mississippi. Each offers distinct strengths based on local communities' needs and professional networks.

If you prefer a vibrant city environment, the best social work programs in Nashville may be an excellent fit. No matter the location, these programs can lead to careers in counseling, clinical social work, school psychology, or community outreach. By exploring online pathways, students can match their personal goals to in-demand psychological and social service roles nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Donald H. Saklofske

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles