World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Natalio Extremera

Natalio Extremera

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3345 3080 35 35 199 16687

Natalio Extremera publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natalio Extremera between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natalio Extremera published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 16 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
2002 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natalio Extremera: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 6
2005 7
2006 10
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 3
2011 8
2012 8
2013 9
2014 11
2015 11
2016 14
2017 12
2018 15
2019 21
2020 26
2021 18
2022 19
2023 10
2024 7
2025 9
Total 231
Download as CSV

Natalio Extremera publications per year - data summary

  • Natalio Extremera, a Psychology scholar from University of Malaga, has 231 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2002 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 26 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2002, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 24 years in the span carries no publications at all (2003).
  • The rate of publication averages 9.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.0 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 63 publications, 27% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2002-2009: 30 publications (3.8 per year); 2010-2017: 76 publications (9.5 per year); 2018-2025: 125 publications (15.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Natalio Extremera publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalio Extremera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 199 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 199
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Natalio Extremera publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Natalio Extremera, a Psychology scholar from University of Malaga, records 199 publications - the 69th percentile of the discipline.
  • 69% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Natalio Extremera, and about 31% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Natalio Extremera ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Natalio Extremera D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natalio Extremera sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Natalio Extremera D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Natalio Extremera, a Psychology scholar from University of Malaga, records 61 D-Index - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Natalio Extremera, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Natalio Extremera ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Natalio Extremera is affiliated with the University of Malaga in Spain. Their primary research areas include psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, education, sociology and political science, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their research covers several main topics, including emotional intelligence and performance, bullying, victimization, and aggression, stress and burnout research, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, child development and digital technology, the impact of technology on adolescents, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Natalio Extremera has published extensively, contributing to leading journals and venues, such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed )
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • KNOW AND SHARE PSYCHOLOGY

Among their recent publications are:

  • "A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Academic Performance in Secondary Education: A Multi-Stream Comparison" (2020), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Adolescents' problematic internet and smartphone use is related to suicide ideation: Does emotional intelligence make a difference?" (2020), Computers in Human Behavior
  • "The Role of Emotional Intelligence, the Teacher-Student Relationship, and Flourishing on Academic Performance in Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Study" (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Pathways between Ability Emotional Intelligence and Subjective Well-Being: Bridging Links through Cognitive Emotion Regulation Strategies" (2020), Sustainability
  • "Leaving the Teaching Profession: Examining the Role of Social Support, Engagement and Emotional Intelligence in Teachers' Intentions to Quit" (2020), Psychosocial Intervention

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Lourdes Rey
  • Sergio Mérida-López
  • Nicolás Sánchez-Álvarez
  • Cirenia Quintana-Orts
  • Christiane Arrivillaga

The research performed by Natalio Extremera involves exploring the interconnections between emotional intelligence and various dimensions of human behavior and academic performance. This includes examining the role of emotional intelligence in adolescent well-being and suicide ideation, the psychological impact of technology use, and mechanisms for stress regulation. Their work also touches on educational outcomes and the teacher-student dynamic, as well as factors influencing job satisfaction and retention within the teaching profession.

Best Publications

  • Validity and reliability of the Spanish modified version of the trait meta-mood scale

    Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal;Natalio Extremera;Natalia Ramos

  • The relation between emotional intelligence and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic investigation

    Nicolás Sánchez-Álvarez;Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

  • The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents

    Pablo Fernández-Berrocal;Rocio Alcaide;Natalio Extremera;David Pizarro

  • Emotional Intelligence as Predictor of Mental, Social, and Physical Health in University Students

    Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

  • Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction : Predictive and incremental validity using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale

    Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

  • Emotional intelligence: a theoretical and empirical review of its first 15 years of history.

    Pablo Fernández-Berrocal;Natalio Extremera

  • La importancia de desarrollar la inteligencia emocional en el profesorado

    Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

  • Spanish version of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT). Version 2.0: Reliabilities, age and gender differences

    Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal;Peter Salovey

  • Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Cass R. Sunstein;Matthew D. Adler;Christopher J. Anderson;Elizabeth Anderson

  • Perceived emotional intelligence and dispositional optimism–pessimism: Analyzing their role in predicting psychological adjustment among adolescents

    Natalio Extremera;Auxiliadora Durán;Lourdes Rey

  • Age and gender differences in ability emotional intelligence in adults: A cross-sectional study.

    Rosario Cabello;Miguel A. Sorrel;Irene Fernández-Pinto;Natalio Extremera

  • Gender differences in emotional intelligence: The mediating effect of age.

    Pablo Fernández-Berrocal;Rosario Cabello;Ruth Castillo;Natalio Extremera

  • Emotional intelligence and teacher burnout: A systematic review

    Sergio Mérida-López;Natalio Extremera

  • Perceived Emotional Intelligence, Self-Esteem and Life Satisfaction in Adolescents

    Lourdes Rey;Natalio Extremera;Mario Pena

  • Relation of perceived emotional intelligence and health-related quality of life of middle-aged women.

    Natalio Extremera;Pablo Fernández-Berrocal

  • Emotional intelligence, life satisfaction and subjective happiness in female student health professionals: the mediating effect of perceived stress

    D. Ruiz-Aranda;N. Extremera;C. Pineda-Galán

  • Engagement y Burnout en el ámbito docente: Análisis de sus relaciones con la satisfacción laboral y vital en una muestra de profesores

    M.ª Auxiliadora Durán;Natalio Extremera;Fco. Manuel Montalbán;Lourdes Rey

  • The moderating effect of trait meta-mood and perceived stress on life satisfaction

    Natalio Extremera;Auxiliadora Durán;Lourdes Rey

  • Cultural influences on the relation between perceived emotional intelligence and depression

    Pablo Fernandez-Berrocal;Peter Salovey;Aldo Vera;Natalio Extremera

  • Self-reported emotional intelligence, burnout and engagement among staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities.

    Auxiliadora Durán;Natalio Extremera;Lourdes Rey

Frequent Co-Authors

Pablo Fernández-Berrocal
Pablo Fernández-Berrocal University of Malaga
Peter Salovey
Peter Salovey Yale University
Edward C. Chang
Edward C. Chang University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Félix Neto
Félix Neto University of Porto
David A. Pizarro
David A. Pizarro Cornell University
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ulrike Hahn
Ulrike Hahn Birkbeck, University of London
Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Elke U. Weber
Elke U. Weber Princeton University
Harold A. Herzog
Harold A. Herzog Western Carolina University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often leads students to consider related fields such as social work. With the growing demand for mental health and community support services, online degrees in social work are becoming increasingly popular for their flexibility and convenience.

For those looking to minimize student debt, there are many affordable online social work bachelor's programs in the US, offering accredited learning experiences at a fraction of traditional costs. If you live in the Northwest, you might be interested in the cheapest online social work programs in Boise, which provide solid educational foundations with regional affordability.

Students in the South can explore affordable online social work programs in Kentucky, while those in New England may find excellent value with affordable online social work programs in Massachusetts. Each program offers courses that reflect local needs, preparing graduates for diverse career pathways in counseling, case management, and advocacy roles.

Choosing the right online degree can pave the way for a fulfilling career supporting individuals, families, and communities—all from the flexibility of your own home.

Best Scientists Citing Natalio Extremera

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles