World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
7650
World Ranking
7267
National Ranking
722

Ulrike Hahn publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Hahn sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 179 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ulrike Hahn D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Hahn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrike Hahn is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on Computer Science and Social Sciences. Ulrike Hahn's work contributes to subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, General Decision Sciences, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's research addresses a variety of topics such as:

  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Topic Modeling
  • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Ulrike Hahn's publication record includes papers in notable venues like Cognition, arXiv (Cornell University), SSRN Electronic Journal, Nature Human Behaviour, and Synthese. The most frequent publication venue is Cognition, with six publications, followed by arXiv with four, and SSRN Electronic Journal with three.

Some of the recent papers connected with Ulrike Hahn's research include:

  • "Identification of distinct cytotoxic granules as the origin of supramolecular attack particles in T lymphocytes" (2022), published in Nature Communications
  • "How large language models can reshape collective intelligence" (2024), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks" (2021), published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Argument Quality in Real World Argumentation" (2020), published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "When Science Becomes Embroiled in Conflict: Recognizing the Public's Need for Debate while Combating Conspiracies and Misinformation" (2022), published in The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ulrike Hahn include:

  • Marko Tešić
  • Stephan Lewandowsky
  • Dawn Liu Holford
  • Toby D. Pilditch
  • David A. Lagnado

Ulrike Hahn has also contributed to book publications, including the work published by the Swiss School of Archaeology in Greece. One notable title is "The COVID-19 vaccine communication handbook: A practical guide for improving vaccine communication and fighting misinformation" (2021).

Best Publications

  • Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods?

    Todd M. Bailey;Ulrike Hahn

  • Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour

    Laurel Evans;Laurel Evans;Gregory Richard Maio;Adam J. Corner;Carl J. Hodgetts

  • Moral heuristics. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Cass R. Sunstein;Matthew D. Adler;Christopher J. Anderson;Elizabeth Anderson

  • The Rationality of Informal Argumentation: A Bayesian Approach to Reasoning Fallacies

    Ulrike Hahn;Michael Robert Oaksford

  • Concepts and Similarity

    Ulrike Hahn;N. Chater

  • Similarity as transformation.

    Ulrike Hahn;Nick Chater;Lucy Brenda Clare Richardson

  • Unrealistic optimism about future life events: a cautionary note.

    Adam J. L. Harris;Ulrike Hahn

  • German inflection: single route or dual route?

    Ulrike Hahn;Ramin Charles Nakisa

  • Similarity and rules : distinct? exhaustive? empirically distinguishable?

    Ulrike Hahn;Nick Chater

  • Perceptions of Randomness: Why Three Heads Are Better than Four.

    Ulrike Hahn;Paul Antony Warren

  • What Does It Mean to be Biased: Motivated Reasoning and Rationality

    Ulrike Hahn;Adam J.L. Harris

  • Similarity and categorization

    Ulrike Hahn;Michael Ramscar

  • Phoneme similarity and confusability

    Todd M. Bailey;Ulrike Hahn

  • Representational Distortion, Similarity and the Universal Law of Generalization

    N Chater;U Hahn

  • Bayesian models of cognition

    Nick Chater;Mike Oaksford;Ulrike Hahn;Evan Heit

  • The psychological mechanism of the slippery slope argument

    Adam J. Corner;Ulrike Hahn;Mike Oaksford

  • Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children

    Evan Heit;Ulrike Hahn

  • Estimating the probability of negative events.

    Adam J. L. Harris;Adam J. Corner;Ulrike Hahn

  • A Bayesian approach to the argument from ignorance.

    Michael Oaksford;Ulrike Hahn

  • So concepts aren't definitions, but do they have necessary or sufficient features?

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Ulrike Hahn

  • THEORETICAL NOTE Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events: A Cautionary Note

    Adam J. L. Harris;Ulrike Hahn

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Oaksford
Mike Oaksford Birkbeck, University of London
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Emmanuel M. Pothos
Emmanuel M. Pothos City, University of London
Gregory R. Maio
Gregory R. Maio University of Bath
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
Michael Ramscar
Michael Ramscar University of Tübingen
Evan Heit
Evan Heit National Science Foundation
Shanmukh V. Kamble
Shanmukh V. Kamble Karnatak University
Geoffrey Bird
Geoffrey Bird University of Oxford
Karl Christoph Klauer
Karl Christoph Klauer University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree opens the door to a range of fulfilling career pathways, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. As the demand for qualified professionals grows, many universities in the United States offer flexible online counseling programs tailored for different career goals and schedules.

If you’re considering specializing in counseling, it's essential to compare programs based on factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, clinical opportunities, and state licensing requirements. To explore options in specific regions, you can review the best counseling program rankings in Michigan, as well as the best counseling program rankings in the Midwest. These lists highlight top-rated institutions, making it easier to find a program that fits your professional interests.

Students residing in or seeking to study in other states can also consult the best counseling degree programs in Minnesota and the best counseling program rankings in Mississippi. Each guide provides valuable insights into curriculum strengths and potential career outcomes for graduates.

Choosing the right online program can help you build the skills and credentials needed to launch a rewarding career in counseling or mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Hahn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles