World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7140
World Ranking
8803
National Ranking
889

Emmanuel M. Pothos publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel M. Pothos sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emmanuel M. Pothos D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emmanuel M. Pothos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emmanuel M. Pothos is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. The research spans fields primarily related to Physics and Astronomy, with a notable presence in subfields such as Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics; Artificial Intelligence; General Decision Sciences; Statistical and Nonlinear Physics; and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their work is concentrated on main topics including Quantum Mechanics and Applications, Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Quantum Information and Cryptography, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Forecasting Techniques and Applications, Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis, and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference.

Frequent research collaborators include Paweł Błasiak, James M. Yearsley, Christoph Gallus, Jerome R. Busemeyer, and B. W. Wojciechowski.

Publications have appeared regularly in several venues, with multiple contributions to Entropy, arXiv (Cornell University), Decision, Topics in Cognitive Science, and Scientific Reports.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Emmanuel M. Pothos highlight key research themes:

  • Quantum Cognition, 2021, Annual Review of Psychology
  • Information overload for (bounded) rational agents, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Violations of locality and free choice are equivalent resources in Bell experiments, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Top-down and bottom-up attentional biases for smoking-related stimuli: Comparing dependent and non-dependent smokers, 2021, Addictive Behaviors
  • Quantum Circuit Components for Cognitive Decision-Making, 2023, Entropy

The research threads reflect a strong emphasis on the intersection of quantum theory with cognition and decision-making processes, as well as broader applications in behavioral economics and cognitive neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • The addiction-stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations.

    W. Miles Cox;Javad Salehi Fadardi;Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • A Quantum Theoretical Explanation for Probability Judgment Errors.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Riccardo Franco;Jennifer S. Trueblood

  • Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Theories of artificial grammar learning.

    Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Nick Chater

  • The Potential of Using Quantum Theory to Build Models of Cognition

    Zheng Wang;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Harald Atmanspacher;Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • The rules versus similarity distinction.

    Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • Formal approaches in categorization

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Andy J. Wills

  • Cognitive biases to healthy and unhealthy food words predict change in BMI.

    Raff Calitri;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Katy Tapper;Jeffrey M. Brunstrom

  • The role of similarity in artificial grammar learning.

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Todd M. Bailey

  • A quantum geometric model of similarity.

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Jennifer S. Trueblood

  • Cognitive-motivational predictors of excessive drinkers’ success in changing

    W. Miles Cox;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Steven G. Hosier

  • On the adequacy of current empirical evaluations of formal models of categorization.

    Andy J. Wills;Emmanuel M. Pothos

  • Feast Your Eyes: Hunger and Trait Reward Drive Predict Attentional Bias for Food Cues

    Katy Tapper;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Andrew David Lawrence

  • So concepts aren't definitions, but do they have necessary or sufficient features?

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Ulrike Hahn

  • Understanding cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma game

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Gavin Perry;Philip J. Corr;Mervin R. Matthew

  • Estimating everyday portion size using a 'method of constant stimuli': in a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI.

    Jeffrey M. Brunstrom;Peter J. Rogers;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Raff Calitri

  • One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach.

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;James Close

  • Restraint, disinhibition and food-related processing bias.

    Katy Tapper;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Javad S. Fadardi;Javad S. Fadardi;Eleni Ziori

  • Understanding developmental language disorder-The Helsinki longitudinal SLI study (HelSLI): A study protocol

    Marja Laasonen;Marja Laasonen;Sini Smolander;Sini Smolander;Pekka Lahti-Nuuttila;Miika Leminen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerome R. Busemeyer
Jerome R. Busemeyer Indiana University
Katy Tapper
Katy Tapper City, University of London
Andrei Khrennikov
Andrei Khrennikov Linnaeus University
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Ulrike Hahn
Ulrike Hahn Birkbeck, University of London
W. Miles Cox
W. Miles Cox Bangor University
Richard M. Shiffrin
Richard M. Shiffrin Indiana University
Joseph Tzelgov
Joseph Tzelgov Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom
Jeffrey M. Brunstrom University of Bristol
Peter J. Rogers
Peter J. Rogers University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career options, particularly in mental health and counseling. Many students choose to specialize in substance abuse counseling, a field with growing demand across the United States. While pursuing an advanced degree can enhance your job prospects, entry requirements and certification standards vary by location.

For example, those interested in state-specific certifications can review the Honolulu substance abuse counselor certification requirements or the Houston substance abuse counselor certification requirements. These links provide valuable insights into the educational background, supervised experience, and exams needed to qualify in different regions.

Additionally, it’s important to understand various educational expectations by location, such as the Huntsville substance abuse counselors education requirements or the Indianapolis substance abuse counselors education requirements. Carefully researching regional guidelines ensures you meet all necessary credentials to begin your career.

Whether you pursue licensure online or on campus, psychology degrees can prepare you to work in schools, rehabilitation centers, hospitals, and private practice, making a meaningful impact on individuals and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Emmanuel M. Pothos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles