World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jerome R. Busemeyer

Jerome R. Busemeyer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
80
Citations
26788
World Ranking
1438
National Ranking
865

Jerome R. Busemeyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome R. Busemeyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 270 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jerome R. Busemeyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jerome R. Busemeyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Jerome R. Busemeyer is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Decision Sciences and Computer Science, with a specialized focus on subfields including General Decision Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, as well as Management Science and Operations Research and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The primary topics addressed in their work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Quantum Mechanics and Applications, Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture, Quantum Information and Cryptography, Forecasting Techniques and Applications, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques.

Their recent publications comprise the following papers:

  • "Quantum Cognition" (2021), published in Annual Review of Psychology
  • "Temporal oscillations in preference strength provide evidence for an open system model of constructed preference" (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Testing the factor structure underlying behavior using joint cognitive models: Impulsivity in delay discounting and Cambridge gambling tasks." (2020), published in Psychological Methods
  • "A distributional and dynamic theory of pricing and preference." (2020), published in Psychological Review
  • "Comparison of Markov versus quantum dynamical models of human decision making" (2020), published in Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Emmanuel M. Pothos
  • Peter D. Kvam
  • Qizi Zhang
  • Timothy J. Pleskac
  • Brandon M. Turner

The venues in which Jerome R. Busemeyer frequently publishes are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Decision
  • Psychological Review
  • Entropy
  • Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Their contributions also include books published by notable academic publishers, including:

  • "Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision" (2024), published by Cambridge University Press
  • "Cognitive Choice Modeling" (2021), published by The MIT Press

Jerome R. Busemeyer was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Decision Field Theory: A Dynamic-Cognitive Approach to Decision Making in an Uncertain Environment.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;James T. Townsend

  • A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

    Unknown

  • Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Peter D. Bruza

  • Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision: Frontmatter

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Peter D. Bruza

  • Two-stage dynamic signal detection: a theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.

    Timothy J. Pleskac;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Lawrence E. Jones

  • A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Quantum dynamics of human decision-making

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Zheng Wang;James T. Townsend

  • A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Julie C. Stout

  • A Quantum Theoretical Explanation for Probability Judgment Errors.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Emmanuel M. Pothos;Riccardo Franco;Jennifer S. Trueblood

  • Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling

    Emmanuel M. Pothos;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice

    Jörg Rieskamp;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Barbara A. Mellers

  • Using Cognitive Models to Map Relations Between Neuropsychological Disorders and Human Decision-Making Deficits

    Eldad Yechiam;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Julie C. Stout;Antoine Bechara

  • Model comparisons and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Yi-Min Wang

  • Context effects produced by question orders reveal quantum nature of human judgments

    Zheng Wang;Tyler Solloway;Richard M. Shiffrin;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Survey of decision field theory

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Adele Diederich

  • Not Just for Consumers Context Effects Are Fundamental to Decision Making

    Jennifer S. Trueblood;Scott D. Brown;Andrew Heathcote;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Quantum cognition: a new theoretical approach to psychology

    Peter D. Bruza;Zheng Wang;Jerome R. Busemeyer

  • Older adults as adaptive decision makers: evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task.

    Stacey Wood;Jerome Busemeyer;Andreas Koling;Cathy R Cox

  • Extrapolation: the sine qua non for abstraction in function learning.

    Edward L. DeLosh;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Mark A. McDaniel

  • An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;In Jae Myung

  • The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology

    Jerome R. Busemeyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Emmanuel M. Pothos
Emmanuel M. Pothos City, University of London
Peter Bruza
Peter Bruza Queensland University of Technology
Julie C. Stout
Julie C. Stout Monash University
Eldad Yechiam
Eldad Yechiam Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
James T. Townsend
James T. Townsend Indiana University
Richard M. Shiffrin
Richard M. Shiffrin Indiana University
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Jörg Rieskamp
Jörg Rieskamp University of Basel
Peter R. Finn
Peter R. Finn Indiana University
S. N. Balakrishnan
S. N. Balakrishnan Missouri University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding career pathways, including roles in mental health counseling, research, and therapy. One popular field is marriage and family therapy (MFT), which requires both specialized education and specific licensure.

Educational requirements and certification steps vary by location in the USA. For example, individuals interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Cincinnati will need to meet Ohio's clinical training and supervised practicum standards. Meanwhile, understanding Cleveland mft education requirements can help you prepare the necessary coursework and internships specific to that city's guidelines.

For students planning to establish careers outside Ohio, research is essential. Knowing how to become an mft in Colorado Springs is crucial as Colorado has distinct licensure procedures. Likewise, those pursuing how to become an mft in Columbus must adhere to local requirements.

Online degrees can offer the flexibility needed to fulfill these region-specific pathways, but it is vital to stay informed about local accreditation, practicum, and state licensing regulations for your chosen career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Jerome R. Busemeyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles