World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
9001
World Ranking
6174
National Ranking
66

Jörg Rieskamp publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Rieskamp sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jörg Rieskamp D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Rieskamp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jörg Rieskamp is affiliated with the University of Basel in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Decision Sciences and Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with a substantial focus on various subfields and applied topics within these areas.

The main areas of study include:

  • Decision Sciences
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Within these broad fields, Rieskamp's work delves into subfields such as General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Management Science and Operations Research, and Applied Psychology.

Their research topics cover:

  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Forecasting Techniques and Applications
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being

Rieskamp has contributed numerous papers to scholarly journals, including:

  • "Distinguishing three effects of time pressure on risk taking: Choice consistency, risk preference, and strategy selection" (2021), Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
  • "Cognitive abilities affect decision errors but not risk preferences: A meta-analysis" (2022), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "The influence of visual attention on memory-based preferential choice" (2021), Cognition
  • "Risk preferences and risk perception affect the acceptance of digital contact tracing" (2021), Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
  • "Stress-related changes in financial risk taking: Considering joint effects of cortisol and affect" (2020), Psychophysiology

Frequent publication venues for Rieskamp's work include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Cognition
  • Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
  • Psychological Review

Throughout their career, Rieskamp has collaborated with several recurrent coauthors, including:

  • Steve Heinke
  • Sebastian Olschewski
  • Amir Hosein Hadian Rasanan
  • Rebecca Albrecht
  • Jana Bianca Jarecki

Best Publications

  • SSL: A Theory of How People Learn to Select Strategies.

    Unknown

  • Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits

    Renato Frey;Renato Frey;Andreas Pedroni;Andreas Pedroni;Rui Mata;Jörg Rieskamp

  • Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential Choice

    Jörg Rieskamp;Jerome R. Busemeyer;Barbara A. Mellers

  • The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies.

    Rui Mata;Lael J. Schooler;Jörg Rieskamp

  • Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.

    Jörg Rieskamp;Ulrich Hoffrage

  • An Introduction to Bayesian Hypothesis Testing for Management Research

    Sandra Andraszewicz;Benjamin Scheibehenne;Jörg Rieskamp;Raoul Grasman

  • The probabilistic nature of preferential choice.

    Jörg Rieskamp

  • Hierarchical Bayesian Parameter Estimation for Cumulative Prospect Theory

    Håkan Nilsson;Håkan Nilsson;Jörg Rieskamp;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Cognitive and Neural Bases of Multi-Attribute, Multi-Alternative, Value-based Decisions.

    Jerome R. Busemeyer;Sebastian Gluth;Jörg Rieskamp;Brandon M. Turner

  • The risk elicitation puzzle

    Andreas Pedroni;Andreas Pedroni;Renato Frey;Adrian Bruhin;Gilles Dutilh

  • Deciding When to Decide: Time-Variant Sequential Sampling Models Explain the Emergence of Value-Based Decisions in the Human Brain

    Sebastian Gluth;Jörg Rieskamp;Christian Büchel

  • A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions.

    Laura Fontanesi;Sebastian Gluth;Mikhail S. Spektor;Jörg Rieskamp

  • The Quality of Response Time Data Inference: A Blinded, Collaborative Assessment of the Validity of Cognitive Models

    Gilles Dutilh;Jeffrey Annis;Scott D. Brown;Peter Cassey

  • Effective Connectivity between Hippocampus and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Controls Preferential Choices from Memory.

    Sebastian Gluth;Sebastian Gluth;Tobias Sommer;Jörg Rieskamp;Christian Büchel

  • Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.

    Nicolas A. J. Berkowitsch;Benjamin Scheibehenne;Jörg Rieskamp

  • The Neural Basis of Following Advice

    Guido Biele;Jörg Rieskamp;Lea K. Krugel;Hauke R. Heekeren

  • Testing Adaptive Toolbox Models: A Bayesian Hierarchical Approach.

    Benjamin Scheibehenne;Jörg Rieskamp;Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

  • Social Sampling Explains Apparent Biases in Judgments of Social Environments

    Mirta Galesic;Henrik Olsson;Jörg Rieskamp

  • Neurobiology of Value Integration: When Value Impacts Valuation

    Soyoung Q Park;Thorsten Kahnt;Thorsten Kahnt;Jörg Rieskamp;Hauke R. Heekeren

  • The influence of information redundancy on probabilistic inferences

    Anja Dieckmann;Jörg Rieskamp

  • Value-based attentional capture affects multi-alternative decision making

    Unknown

  • Diminishing parochialism in intergroup conflict by disrupting the right temporo-parietal junction.

    Thomas Baumgartner;Bastian Schiller;Jörg Rieskamp;Lorena R.R. Gianotti

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralph Hertwig
Ralph Hertwig Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Rui Mata
Rui Mata University of Basel
Hauke R. Heekeren
Hauke R. Heekeren Universität Hamburg
Jerome R. Busemeyer
Jerome R. Busemeyer Indiana University
Thorsten Kahnt
Thorsten Kahnt Northwestern University
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers University of Amsterdam
Christian Büchel
Christian Büchel University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Gerd Gigerenzer
Gerd Gigerenzer Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Rocio Garcia-Retamero University of Granada
Peter M. Todd
Peter M. Todd Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees opens up flexible and affordable options for students across the USA. Many institutions now offer accredited online programs that make it easier for working professionals and remote learners to pursue their career goals.

For those interested in cost-effective pathways, there are numerous programs designed to reduce the financial burden. For instance, the cheapest online counseling programs in Florida provide accessible education for aspiring professionals in the Sunshine State. Similarly, students seeking affordable online counseling degrees in Georgia will find several competitively priced options tailored to Southern learners.

Those living on the West Coast can benefit from both regional and city-specific opportunities. Whether you need the convenience of affordable online counseling degrees in Los Angeles or are searching for the cheapest online counseling master's programs in California, there are plenty of accredited, high-value options.

Choosing the right program can significantly impact your future career opportunities in areas such as clinical psychology, school counseling, and mental health services. Review these pathways carefully to find a program that best fits your goals and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jörg Rieskamp

Trending Scientists