World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rocio Garcia-Retamero

Rocio Garcia-Retamero

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5634 5232 63 62 187 10820

Rocio Garcia-Retamero publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rocio Garcia-Retamero between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rocio Garcia-Retamero published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2012. 17 of the 230 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2012. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 30 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 12 publications
2004 2025

230 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rocio Garcia-Retamero: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 7
2007 5
2008 8
2009 13
2010 9
2011 14
2012 30
2013 17
2014 14
2015 19
2016 13
2017 15
2018 12
2019 5
2020 12
2021 6
2022 1
2023 10
2024 5
2025 12
Total 230
Download as CSV

Rocio Garcia-Retamero publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rocio Garcia-Retamero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 187 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 187
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rocio Garcia-Retamero D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rocio Garcia-Retamero sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rocio Garcia-Retamero is affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain. Their research spans multiple interdisciplinary fields, including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, sociology and political science, and applied psychology.

Their work covers several prominent topics such as autism spectrum disorder research, cardiac health and mental health, behavioral health and interventions, family and disability support research, cancer survivorship and care, climate change communication and perception, and chronic disease management strategies.

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of Garcia-Retamero's research contributions:

  • Worry, Risk Perception, and Controllability Predict Intentions Toward COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • Psychosocial markers of pre-hospital decision delay and psychological distress in acute coronary syndrome patients (2020), published in British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Physical Comorbidities and Depression in Recent and Long-Term Adult Cancer Survivors: NHANES 2007-2018 (2021), published in Cancers
  • Siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders: social support and family quality of life (2020), published in Quality of Life Research
  • Psychological and cognitive factors related to prehospital delay in acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review (2020), published in International Journal of Nursing Studies

Garcia-Retamero frequently publishes in venues such as DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)), Frontiers in Psychology, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Psycho-Oncology, and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Notable frequent co-authors in their publication record include José M. Ordovás, Mariano Estéban, Beatriz González López-Valcárcel, Marco Inzitari, and Pedro Jordano.

Best Publications

  • Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin numeracy test

    Edward T. Cokely;Mirta Galesic;Eric Schulz;Saima Ghazal

  • Prejudice against Women in Male-congenial Environments: Perceptions of Gender Role Congruity in Leadership

    Rocío García-Retamero;Esther López-Zafra

  • Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks : Overcoming low numeracy

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Graph Literacy: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Communicating Health Risks With Visual Aids

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Edward T. Cokely

  • Designing Visual Aids That Promote Risk Literacy: A Systematic Review of Health Research and Evidence-Based Design Heuristics.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Edward T Cokely

  • Who proficts from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people's understanding of risks

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • Identity, Power, and Threat Perception A Cross-National Experimental Study

    David L. Rousseau;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • The relationship between transformational leadership and emotional intelligence from a gendered approach

    Esther Lopez-Zafra;Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Rocio Garcia-Retamero;M. Pilar Berrios Martos

  • Statistical numeracy for health : A cross-cultural comparison with probabilistic national samples

    Mirta Galesic;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Edward T. Cokely

  • Do icon arrays help reduce denominator neglect

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic;Gerd Gigerenzer

  • Predicting biases in very highly educated samples: Numeracy and metacognition

    Saima Ghazal;Edward T. Cokely;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Take-the-best in expert-novice decision strategies for residential burglary

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mandeep K. Dhami

  • Communicating Treatment Risk Reduction to People With Low Numeracy Skills: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

  • Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Ulrich Hoffrage

  • Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension

    Yasmina Okan;Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Edward T. Cokely;Antonio Maldonado

  • Cassandra’s regret: The psychology of not wanting to know.

    Gerd Gigerenzer;Rocio Garcia-Retamero

  • Using Visual Aids to Improve Communication of Risks about Health: A Review

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Yasmina Okan;Edward T. Cokely

  • Doc, what would you do if you were me? On self-other discrepancies in medical decision making.

    Rocio Garcia-Retamero;Mirta Galesic

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward T. Cokely
Edward T. Cokely University of Oklahoma
Mirta Galesic
Mirta Galesic Santa Fe Institute
Andrés Catena
Andrés Catena University of Granada
Gerd Gigerenzer
Gerd Gigerenzer Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Alice H. Eagly
Alice H. Eagly Northwestern University
Daniel G. Morrow
Daniel G. Morrow University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Thomas S. Huang
Thomas S. Huang University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mark Hasegawa-Johnson
Mark Hasegawa-Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Joop van der Pligt
Joop van der Pligt University of Amsterdam
Joseph Sharit
Joseph Sharit University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology often goes beyond earning a basic degree. Many students pursue specialized certifications and advanced education online to broaden their career opportunities. One increasingly popular pathway is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a role that supports individuals with behavioral disorders in various settings, including schools and healthcare facilities.

To qualify for these careers, students must meet specific educational and licensure requirements that can vary by state. For instance, the Minneapolis bcba education requirements highlight the need for graduate-level study and supervised fieldwork. Similarly, those interested in becoming a bcba in Nashville must complete an approved master's program and pass a national certification exam.

Other cities have their own unique criteria. For example, New Orleans bcba education requirements emphasize local training standards, while New York City bcba requirements also reflect rigorous state regulations.

Online degrees in psychology and behavior analysis can help you navigate these varying pathways and advance your career, no matter where you plan to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Rocio Garcia-Retamero

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles