World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
60
Citations
62970
World Ranking
526
National Ranking
39

David Spiegelhalter publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Spiegelhalter sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 125 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David Spiegelhalter D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Spiegelhalter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Best Publications

  • Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice

    W.R. Gilks;S. Richardson;David Spiegelhalter

  • Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Nicola G. Best;Bradley P. Carlin;Angelika Van Der Linde

  • WinBUGS – A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility

    David J. Lunn;Andrew Thomas;Nicky Best;David Spiegelhalter

  • Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems

    S. L. Lauritzen;D. J. Spiegelhalter

  • The BUGS project: Evolution, critique and future directions

    David Lunn;David Spiegelhalter;Andrew Thomas;Nicky Best

  • Bayesian approaches to clinical trials and health-care evaluation

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Keith R. Abrams;Jonathan P. Myles

  • The BUGS Book: A Practical Introduction to Bayesian Analysis

    David Lunn;Christopher Jackson;Nicky Best;Andrew Thomas

  • Funnel plots for comparing institutional performance.

    David J. Spiegelhalter

  • Bayesian Approaches to Randomized Trials

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Laurence S. Freedman;Mahesh K. B. Parmar

  • Sequential updating of conditional probabilities on directed graphical structures

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Steffen L. Lauritzen

  • Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study

    Teresa C. Smith;David J. Spiegelhalter;Andrew Thomas

  • Robust meta-analytic-predictive priors in clinical trials with historical control information

    Heinz Schmidli;Sandro Gsteiger;Satrajit Roychoudhury;Anthony O'Hagan

  • Methods in health service research. An introduction to bayesian methods in health technology assessment.

    David J Spiegelhalter;Jonathan P Myles;David R Jones;Keith R Abrams

  • Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial.

    D.L. Stoker;D.J. Spiegelhalter;R. Singh;J.M. Wellwood

  • Bayes Factors for Linear and Log-Linear Models with Vague Prior Information

    D. J. Spiegelhalter;A. F. M. Smith

  • Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost

    James Wellwood;Mark J Sculpher;David Stoker;Graham J Nicholls

  • Probabilistic prediction in patient management and clinical trials

    D. J. Spiegelhalter

  • Summarizing historical information on controls in clinical trials.

    Beat Neuenschwander;Gorana Capkun-Niggli;Michael Branson;David J Spiegelhalter

  • Monitoring clinical trials: Conditional or predictive power?

    David J. Spiegelhalter;Laurence S. Freedman;Patrick R. Blackburn

  • Modelling Complexity: Applications of Gibbs Sampling in Medicine

    W. R. Gilks;D. G. Clayton;D. J. Spiegelhalter;N. G. Best

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways. Many students enhance their prospects by complementing their math background with skills in business or marketing. For those interested in advancing their leadership potential, exploring programs like the fastest mba online can provide an accelerated route to business expertise without interrupting their career momentum.

Marketing professionals with strong analytical skills are in demand, making a ms in digital marketing degree cost tuition fees an important consideration for budget-conscious students who want to maximize return on investment. Combining math and marketing knowledge can lead to rewarding roles in data analytics, market research, and strategic planning.

For those eager to complete their studies quickly, a one year mba program offers an intensive but efficient pathway to gain advanced business credentials. Additionally, students who have completed previous coursework should look into online mba accepting transfer credits options to save time and tuition while seamlessly continuing their education.

By integrating strategic business qualifications with mathematical expertise, graduates position themselves for a wide range of lucrative, in-demand careers across industries.

Recently Published Articles