World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Sharon-Lise T. Normand

Sharon-Lise T. Normand

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
124
Citations
74086
World Ranking
452
National Ranking
265

Medicine

D-Index
125
Citations
76010
World Ranking
3032
National Ranking
1672

Sharon-Lise T. Normand publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon-Lise T. Normand sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 563 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sharon-Lise T. Normand D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sharon-Lise T. Normand sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 125 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2012 - Distinguished Scientist Award, American Heart Association
  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Sharon-Lise T. Normand is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on health systems, clinical research, and statistical methods. Their body of work encompasses 115 publications within medicine, emphasizing subfields such as economics and econometrics, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, general health professions, statistics and probability, and psychiatry and mental health.

Their research covers a range of significant topics including healthcare policy and management, health systems and economic evaluations, emergency and acute care studies, heart failure treatment and management, advanced causal inference techniques, primary care and health outcomes, and statistical methods in clinical trials.

Normand's recent published papers include:

  • Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations (2020, The Lancet)
  • Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction (2021, JAMA Cardiology)
  • Identifying Medicare beneficiaries with dementia (2021, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
  • Performance Metrics for the Comparative Analysis of Clinical Risk Prediction Models Employing Machine Learning (2021, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes)
  • The RECOVERY Platform (2020, New England Journal of Medicine)

Frequent co-authors in Normand's work include:

  • Katya Zelevinsky
  • Marcela Horvitz-Lennon
  • Chana A. Sacks
  • Harlan M. Krumholz
  • John Hsu

Normand has published extensively in venues such as:

  • NEJM Evidence
  • JAMA Network Open
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Recognition for Normand's work includes being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2018, winning the Distinguished Scientist Award from the American Heart Association in 2012, and being designated a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress.

    R C Kessler;G Andrews;L J Colpe;E Hiripi

  • Screening for Serious Mental Illness in the General Population

    Ronald C. Kessler;Peggy R. Barker;Lisa J. Colpe;Joan F. Epstein

  • Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

    Laura Mauri;Dean J. Kereiakes;Robert W. Yeh;Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2--isolated valve surgery.

    Sean M. O'Brien;David M. Shahian;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: A matched analysis using propensity scores

    Sharon-Lise T. Normand;Mary Beth Landrum;Edward Guadagnoli;John Z. Ayanian;John Z. Ayanian

  • The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1--coronary artery bypass grafting surgery.

    David M. Shahian;Sean M. O'Brien;Giovanni Filardo;Victor A. Ferraris

  • Meta‐analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reporting

    Sharon‐Lise T. Normand

  • Criteria for Evaluation of Novel Markers of Cardiovascular Risk A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Mark A. Hlatky;Philip Greenland;Donna K. Arnett;Christie M. Ballantyne

  • Use of Cardiac Rehabilitation by Medicare Beneficiaries After Myocardial Infarction or Coronary Bypass Surgery

    Jose A. Suaya;Donald S. Shepard;Sharon-Lise T. Normand;Philip A. Ades

  • Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

    Robert W. Yeh;Robert W. Yeh;Eric A. Secemsky;Dean J. Kereiakes;Sharon-Lise T. Normand

  • National and Regional Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalization and Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries, 1998-2008

    Jersey Chen;Sharon-Lise T. Normand;Yun Wang;Harlan M. Krumholz

  • Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006.

    Héctor Bueno;Joseph S. Ross;Yun Wang;Jersey Chen

  • Antipsychotic Drug Use and Mortality in Older Adults with Dementia

    Sudeep S. Gill;Susan E. Bronskill;Sharon-Lise T. Normand;Geoffrey M. Anderson

  • An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With an Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Harlan M. Krumholz;Yun Wang;Jennifer A. Mattera;Yongfei Wang

  • Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding

    Muhammad Mamdani;Kathy Sykora;Ping Li;Sharon-Lise T Normand

  • Cardiac Rehabilitation and Survival in Older Coronary Patients

    Jose A. Suaya;William B. Stason;Philip A. Ades;Sharon-Lise T. Normand

  • Patterns of Hospital Performance in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure 30-Day Mortality and Readmission

    Harlan M. Krumholz;Angela R. Merrill;Eric M. Schone;Geoffrey C. Schreiner

  • ACC/AHA Clinical Performance Measures for Adults with Chronic Heart Failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Performance Measures): endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America.

    Robert O. Bonow;Susan Bennett;Donald E. Casey;Theodore G. Ganiats

  • Recent National Trends in Readmission Rates After Heart Failure Hospitalization

    Joseph S. Ross;Jersey Chen;Zhen Qiu Lin;Héctor Bueno

  • Abstract 13840: National and Regional Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalization and Mortality Rates for Medicare Beneficiaries: 1998-2008

    Jersey Chen;Sharon-Lise T Normand;Yun Wang;Harlan M Krumholz

Frequent Co-Authors

Harlan M. Krumholz
Harlan M. Krumholz Yale University
Laura Mauri
Laura Mauri University of Milan
Joseph S. Ross
Joseph S. Ross Yale University
John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Barbara J. McNeil
Barbara J. McNeil Harvard University
Yongfei Wang
Yongfei Wang Yale University
David M. Shahian
David M. Shahian Harvard University
Richard G. Frank
Richard G. Frank Harvard University
Haiden A. Huskamp
Haiden A. Huskamp Harvard University
Frederick A. Masoudi
Frederick A. Masoudi University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA offers a wide range of alternative pathways and degree options, especially through online programs. Healthcare professionals looking to advance their leadership roles may consider a Master of Healthcare Administration. When selecting a master’s program, it’s important to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs, focusing on factors such as accreditation, curriculum, and career outcomes.

For registered nurses, an efficient way to build credentials is by enrolling in rn to bsn programs without clinicals. These programs are ideal for working nurses seeking flexibility, as they allow degree completion without traditional clinical requirements.

Those aiming for leadership or advanced practice roles often consider DNP degrees. Options include dnp online programs designed to be completed quickly, as well as dnp programs noted for their accessible curriculum and supportive resources.

Whether your focus is administration, nursing, or advanced clinical practice, exploring these online degree pathways can help you achieve your career goals in a flexible and accessible format.

Best Scientists Citing Sharon-Lise T. Normand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles