World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paul A. Heidenreich

Paul A. Heidenreich

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
127
Citations
91036
World Ranking
2769
National Ranking
1546

Paul A. Heidenreich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Heidenreich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 842 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul A. Heidenreich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul A. Heidenreich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul A. Heidenreich is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with over 550 publications, of which 300 are in the subfield of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Other areas of study include economics and econometrics, general health professions, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and surgery.

The main topics covered in their work relate to heart failure treatment and management, cardiovascular function and risk factors, health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life. Additional research interests include cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, diabetes treatment and management, healthcare policy and management, and atrial fibrillation management and outcomes.

Frequent collaborators include Alexander T. Sandhu, Gregg C. Fonarow, Clyde W. Yancy, Neil Kalwani, and Stephen J. Greene.

Heidenreich has published extensively across several journals, with the highest number of papers appearing in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Heidenreich include:

  • 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: Executive Summary, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Other notable papers in the wider field, though not authored by Heidenreich, include:

  • Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure, 2021, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function, 2020, Nature
  • Heart Failure Epidemiology and Outcomes Statistics: A Report of the Heart Failure Society of America, 2023, Journal of Cardiac Failure

Best Publications

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • Forecasting the Future of Cardiovascular Disease in the United States A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

    Paul A. Heidenreich;Justin G. Trogdon;Olga A. Khavjou;Javed Butler

  • Forecasting the Impact of Heart Failure in the United States A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

    Paul A. Heidenreich;Nancy M. Albert;Larry A. Allen;David A. Bluemke

  • 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Craig T. January;L. Samuel Wann;Hugh Calkins;Lin Y. Chen

  • 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons

    Craig T. January;L. Samuel Wann;Hugh Calkins;Lin Y. Chen

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival

    Jayant Nath;Elyse Foster;Paul A Heidenreich

  • 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: Executive Summary

    Scott M. Grundy;Neil J. Stone;Alison L. Bailey;Craig Beam

  • Relationship between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission among medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure

    Adrian F. Hernandez;Melissa A. Greiner;Gregg C. Fonarow;Bradley G. Hammill

  • American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee).

    Christopher P Cannon;Alexander Battler;Ralph G Brindis;Jafna L Cox

  • Video-based AI for beat-to-beat assessment of cardiac function.

    David Ouyang;Bryan He;Amirata Ghorbani;Neal Yuan

  • Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart Failure: Endorsed by the Canadian Heart Failure Society, Heart Failure Association of India, Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand, and Chinese Heart Failure Association.

    Biykem Bozkurt;Andrew J.S. Coats;Hiroyuki Tsutsui;Ca Magdy Abdelhamid

  • Heart Failure With Preserved, Borderline, and Reduced Ejection Fraction: 5-Year Outcomes.

    Kevin S. Shah;Haolin Xu;Roland A. Matsouaka;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging

    Robert C. Hendel;Daniel S. Berman;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

    Robert C. Hendel;Daniel S. Berman;Marcelo F. Di Carli;Paul A. Heidenreich

  • Trends in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Prevalence, Therapies, and Outcomes

    Benjamin A. Steinberg;Xin Zhao;Paul A. Heidenreich;Eric D. Peterson

  • ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography

    Pamela S. Douglas;Mario J. Garcia;David E. Haines;Wyman W. Lai

  • Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis

    Roy M. Soetikno;Otto S. Lin;Paul A. Heidenreich;Harvey S. Young

  • Association of renal insufficiency with treatment and outcomes after myocardial infarction in elderly patients.

    Michael G. Shlipak;Paul A. Heidenreich;Haruko Noguchi;Glenn M. Chertow

  • ACC/AHA Statement on Cost/Value Methodology in Clinical Practice Guidelines and Performance Measures: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;Paul A. Heidenreich;Paul G. Barnett;Mark A. Creager

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Clyde W. Yancy
Clyde W. Yancy Northwestern University
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Frederick A. Masoudi
Frederick A. Masoudi University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Lesley H. Curtis
Lesley H. Curtis Duke University
Jeptha P. Curtis
Jeptha P. Curtis Yale University
John S. Rumsfeld
John S. Rumsfeld University of Colorado Denver
Mark A. Hlatky
Mark A. Hlatky Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare but seeking alternatives to traditional medical school, online degrees offer flexible and cost-effective options. Fast-track programs are ideal for those who want to start their clinical career sooner. For example, fast track lpn programs online help you become a Licensed Practical Nurse quickly and conveniently.

If mental health is your passion, consider specialized pathways like the shortest pmhnp program to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in less time than traditional routes.

Budget-minded students can find quality programs as well. The cheapest online health science degree options make it possible to earn credentials without incurring excessive debt. For those seeking leadership roles, enrolling in an affordable mha online can open doors to upper-level positions in healthcare administration.

Exploring these online pathways can help you launch or advance your healthcare career while balancing other responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Paul A. Heidenreich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles