World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
120
Citations
71794
World Ranking
3679
National Ranking
2025

Javed Butler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javed Butler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 835 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Javed Butler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Javed Butler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 120 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Javed Butler is affiliated with the University of Mississippi in the United States and has a research focus centered primarily in the field of Medicine, with a substantial portion of work in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly output includes 1863 publications in Medicine, with 996 specifically addressing cardiology and cardiovascular topics. Other notable subfields include Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Molecular Biology.

Their research interests encompass a range of topics, predominantly in Heart Failure Treatment and Management, as well as Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors. They also conduct significant work on Diabetes Treatment and Management, Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies, Pancreatic function and diabetes, Potassium and Related Disorders, and intersections of Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer.

Javed Butler has published extensively in several notable scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • JACC Heart Failure
  • Journal of Cardiac Failure

Among their recent publications are:

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes with Empagliflozin in Heart Failure, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Empagliflozin in Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction, 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, 2022, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • 2023 Focused Update of the 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure, 2023, European Heart Journal

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors. Among the most common collaborators are:

  • Stefan D. Anker
  • Gregg C. Fonarow
  • Muhammad Shahzeb Khan
  • Stephen J. Greene
  • Gerasimos Filippatos

This body of work contributes to the understanding and clinical management of heart failure and related cardiovascular conditions, integrating multidisciplinary perspectives including endocrinology and metabolic disease.

Best Publications

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure.

    Theresa A McDonagh;Marco Metra;Marianna Adamo;Roy S Gardner

  • Empagliflozin in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction

    Stefan D Anker;Javed Butler;Gerasimos Filippatos;João P Ferreira

  • Evaluation study of congestive heart failure and pulmonary artery catheterization effectiveness

    James A. Hill;Daniel F. Pauly;Debra R. Olitsky;Stuart Russell

  • Genetic mechanisms of critical illness in Covid-19.

    E. Pairo-Castineira;E. Pairo-Castineira;S. Clohisey;L. Klaric;A. D. Bretherick

  • Incidence, predictors at admission, and impact of worsening renal function among patients hospitalized with heart failure.

    Daniel E. Forman;Javed Butler;Yongfei Wang;William T. Abraham

  • SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of the EMPEROR-Reduced and DAPA-HF trials

    Faiez Zannad;João Pedro Ferreira;Stuart J Pocock;Stefan D Anker

  • 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America

    Clyde W. Yancy;Mariell Jessup;Biykem Bozkurt;Javed Butler

  • Medical Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The CHAMP-HF Registry

    Stephen J. Greene;Javed Butler;Nancy M. Albert;Adam D. DeVore

  • Vericiguat in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction

    Paul W Armstrong;Burkert Pieske;Kevin J Anstrom;Justin Ezekowitz

  • 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update on New Pharmacological Therapy for Heart Failure: An Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure

    Clyde W. Yancy;Mariell Jessup;Biykem Bozkurt;Javed Butler

  • Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Early Triage of Patients With Acute Chest Pain: The ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) Trial

    Udo Hoffmann;Fabian Bamberg;Claudia U. Chae;John H. Nichols

  • RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEART FAILURE TREATMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF WORSENING RENAL FUNCTION AMONG HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

    Javed Butler;Daniel E Forman;William T Abraham;Stephen S Gottlieb

  • Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency at discharge after acute heart failure: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

    Piotr Ponikowski;Bridget-Anne Kirwan;Bridget-Anne Kirwan;Stefan D Anker;Theresa McDonagh;Theresa McDonagh

  • Association of Change in N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Following Initiation of Sacubitril-Valsartan Treatment With Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

    James L. Januzzi;Margaret F. Prescott;Javed Butler;G. Michael Felker

  • Low-dose dopamine or low-dose nesiritide in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction: the ROSE acute heart failure randomized trial.

    Horng H. Chen;Kevin J. Anstrom;Michael M. Givertz;Lynne W. Stevenson

  • Calcium upregulation by percutaneous administration of gene therapy in patients with cardiac disease (CUPID 2): a randomised, multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial

    Barry Greenberg;Javed Butler;G Michael Felker;Piotr Ponikowski

  • Myocardial Interstitial Fibrosis in Heart Failure: Biological and Translational Perspectives

    Arantxa González;Erik B. Schelbert;Javier Díez;Javed Butler

  • Characterization and Prognostic Value of Persistent Hyponatremia in Patients With Severe Heart Failure in the ESCAPE Trial

    Mihai Gheorghiade;Joseph S. Rossi;William Cotts;David D. Shin

  • Effect of Oral Iron Repletion on Exercise Capacity in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Iron Deficiency: The IRONOUT HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Gregory D Lewis;Rajeev Malhotra;Adrian F Hernandez;Steven E McNulty

  • Coronary Multidetector Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Patients With Acute Chest Pain

    Udo Hoffmann;John T. Nagurney;Fabian Moselewski;Antonio Pena

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregg C. Fonarow
Gregg C. Fonarow University of California, Los Angeles
Mihai Gheorghiade
Mihai Gheorghiade Northwestern University
Muthiah Vaduganathan
Muthiah Vaduganathan Brigham and Women's Hospital
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
G. Michael Felker
G. Michael Felker Duke University
Ali Ahmed
Ali Ahmed Georgetown University
Faiez Zannad
Faiez Zannad University of Lorraine
Adriaan A. Voors
Adriaan A. Voors University Medical Center Groningen
Marco Metra
Marco Metra University of Brescia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering alternative entry points into healthcare outside of traditional medical school, there are numerous online degree options and career pathways available. One growing field is medical billing and coding, which offers flexible, high-demand work. You can find medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid, helping to make training more affordable.

Nursing remains a popular path for many students. If you are concerned about entrance exams, you may want to explore do i need to take the teas test for lpn programs, which may not require standardized tests for admission.

For those interested in leadership roles, healthcare administration programs online offer accelerated options to fast-track your career in healthcare management.

Nurses looking to advance can benefit from rn to np bridge programs, which allow registered nurses to pursue a master’s degree and become nurse practitioners without repeating undergraduate coursework.

Exploring these alternative pathways can help you find a rewarding healthcare career that fits your life and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Javed Butler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles