World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7235 6746 323 311 229 8171

Arie Dijkstra publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Arie Dijkstra between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Arie Dijkstra published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 4 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 10 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1986 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Arie Dijkstra: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 6
1999 4
2000 4
2001 3
2002 1
2003 10
2004 3
2005 15
2006 11
2007 8
2008 16
2009 11
2010 5
2011 20
2012 16
2013 19
2014 13
2015 14
2016 8
2017 19
2018 6
2019 12
2020 4
2021 5
2022 3
2023 9
2024 2
2025 2
Total 257
Download as CSV

Arie Dijkstra publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Dijkstra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 229
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Arie Dijkstra D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arie Dijkstra sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Arie Dijkstra is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on behavioral health and interventions, human-animal interaction studies, and breastfeeding practices. Their research also covers diverse areas such as psychology of moral and emotional judgment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, as well as media influence and health.

The scientist's work spans both main fields of medicine and psychology, with notable emphasis on applied psychology, genetics, sociology and political science, epidemiology, and social psychology as subfields. These areas collectively demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach in addressing health, behavioral, and social science questions.

Several recent papers exemplify Dijkstra's research interests. Among them are:

  • "Family Member, Best Friend, Child or 'Just' a Pet, Owners' Relationship Perceptions and Consequences for Their Cats" (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Transtheoretical Model (Stages of Change)" (2022), published in The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication
  • "Prognostic factors of adherence to home-based exercise therapy in patients with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2023), published in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
  • "Expectations Versus Reality: Long-Term Research on the Dog-Owner Relationship" (2020), published in Animals
  • "A cross-sectional study of lactation room quality and Dutch working mothers' satisfaction, perceived ease of, and perceived support for breast milk expression at work" (2021), published in International Breastfeeding Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dijkstra include Esther Bouma, Ellen Ricke, Eric W.P. Bakker, Sjoukje A. van Dellen, and Barbara Wisse, reflecting a collaborative network across various topics within health and behavioral sciences.

Dijkstra's publications most commonly appear in several venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Animals
  • Frontiers in Sports and Active Living

Best Publications

  • Understanding tailoring in communicating about health

    Robert P. Hawkins;Matthew Kreuter;Kenneth Resnicow;Martin Fishbein

  • Negative life events and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Bonding and cognitive coping as vulnerability factors?

    Vivian Kraaij;Nadia Garnefski;Erik Jan de Wilde;Arie Dijkstra

  • Polymorphisms of the ADAM33 gene are associated with accelerated lung function decline in asthma

    H Jongepier;Hendrika Boezen;A Dijkstra;T D Howard

  • The development of computer-generated tailored interventions.

    Arie Dijkstra;Hein De Vries

  • Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation

    A Dijkstra;H de Vries;M Bakker

  • Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation

    Arie Dijkstra

  • Lung function decline in asthma: association with inhaled corticosteroids, smoking and sex

    Arie Dijkstra;Judith Vonk;H Jongepier;Gerard Koppelman

  • Determinants of oral hygiene behavior: a study based on the theory of planned behavior.

    Yvonne A.B. Buunk-Werkhoven;Arie Dijkstra;Cees P. van der Schans

  • Differential Beliefs, Perceived Social Influences, and Self-Efficacy Expectations among Smokers in Various Motivational Phases

    H De Vries;A N Mudde;A Dijkstra;M C Willemsen

  • Determinants of forward stage transitions: a Delphi study

    Emely De Vet;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug;Jascha De Nooijer;Arie Dijkstra

  • Effects of active and passive smoking on disease course of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

    Frans van der Heide;Arie Dijkstra;Rinse K. Weersma;Frans A. Albersnagel

  • Efficacy and Use of an Internet-delivered Computer-tailored Lifestyle Intervention, Targeting Saturated Fat Intake, Physical Activity and Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Anke Oenema;Johannes Brug;Johannes Brug;Arie Dijkstra;Inge de Weerdt

  • Tailored interventions to communicate stage-matched information to smokers in different motivational stages.

    A. Dijkstra;H. De Vries;J. Roijackers;G. Van Breukelen

  • Psychometric properties of Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaires: A systematic review

    Michiel F. Reneman;Arie Dijkstra;Jan H.B. Geertzen;Pieter U. Dijkstra

  • The Psychology of Tailoring‐Ingredients in Computer‐Tailored Persuasion

    Unknown

  • Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation

    A. Dijkstra;H. De Vries;J. Roijackers

  • Worry about health in smoking behaviour change.

    Arie Dijkstra;J Brosschot

  • Targeting smokers with low readiness to change with tailored and nontailored self-help materials.

    Arie Dijkstra;Hein De Vries;Jolanda Roijackers

  • A match-mismatch test of a stage model of behaviour change in tobacco smoking

    Arie Dijkstra;Barbara Conijn;Hein De Vries

  • TAILORING INFORMATION TO ENHANCE QUITTING IN SMOKERS WITH LOW MOTIVATION TO QUIT : THREE BASIC EFFICACY QUESTIONS

    Arie Dijkstra;Hein De Vries;Jolanda Roijackers;Gerard van Breukelen

  • Readiness to adopt the self-management approach to cope with chronic pain in fibromyalgic patients.

    Arie Dijkstra;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Heidi Rijnen;Warren Nielson

Frequent Co-Authors

Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Marc C. Willemsen
Marc C. Willemsen Maastricht University
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
José M. Peiró
José M. Peiró University of Valencia
Sijmen A. Reijneveld
Sijmen A. Reijneveld University Medical Center Groningen
Geoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong University of Waterloo
Marloes Kleinjan
Marloes Kleinjan Utrecht University
Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a range of specialized careers, especially in counseling and therapy. Many students explore online degrees, which offer flexibility for both undergraduate and graduate studies. One of the most popular career options is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT).

Career requirements for MFTs vary by location, so it’s important to understand the differences. For instance, mft requirements in Aurora focus on accredited education and state-specific licensure exams. In Texas, Austin mft certification requirements include supervised clinical hours and passing required state exams.

In California, Bakersfield mft education requirements emphasize a graduate degree plus strict training and experience credentials. Meanwhile, how to become an mft in Baltimore details hour requirements and the application process unique to Maryland.

By familiarizing yourself with these state-by-state pathways, you can make informed decisions about online degree programs and map out the most effective route to your desired career in psychology or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Arie Dijkstra

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles