World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
8156
World Ranking
6206
National Ranking
631

Catherine Bolman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Bolman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 153 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Catherine Bolman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Bolman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catherine Bolman is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the intersection of health, psychology, and technology, examining how digital interventions can influence health behaviors, particularly among vulnerable populations.

Their recent scholarly work includes the following papers:

  • The facilitators and barriers of mHealth adoption and use among people with a low socio-economic position: A scoping review, 2023, Digital Health
  • Long-Term Effects on Loneliness of a Computer-Tailored Intervention for Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 2021, Journal of Aging and Health
  • The Effect of Active Plus, a Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention, on the Physical Activity of Older Adults with Chronic Illness(es)-A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Digital health interventions to improve eating behaviour of people with a lower socioeconomic position: a scoping review of behaviour change techniques, 2022, BMC Nutrition
  • Decision aids to facilitate decision making around behavior change in the field of health promotion: A scoping review, 2021, Patient Education and Counseling

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Lilian Lechner (38 coauthored papers)
  • Denise A. Peels (14 coauthored papers)
  • Hein de Vries (9 coauthored papers)
  • Esmee Volders (7 coauthored papers)
  • Juul M. J. Coumans (7 coauthored papers)

Their publications often appear in journals and venues such as:

  • JMIR Formative Research (6 publications)
  • Research Square (4 publications)
  • Digital Health (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 publications)
  • Patient Education and Counseling (2 publications)

Catherine Bolman's main fields of study include Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions. More specific subfields of study include:

  • General Health Professions
  • Physiology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology

The scientist's research covers a range of topics, particularly focused on behavioral and digital health interventions. These topics include:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Best Publications

  • Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception.

    Francine Dehue;Catherine Bolman;Trijntje Völlink

  • Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: a literature review

    Maartje M. van Stralen;Hein De Vries;Aart N. Mudde;Catherine Bolman

  • Definite involuntary childlessness: associations between coping, social support and psychological distress

    Lilian Lechner;C. Bolman;A. van Dalen

  • Coping with Cyberbullying: Differences Between Victims, Bully‐victims and Children not Involved in Bullying

    Trijntje Völlink;Catherine A.W. Bolman;Francine Dehue;Niels C.L. Jacobs

  • Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory: a cluster analysis approach

    Stijn Ah Friederichs;Catherine Bolman;Anke Oenema;Lilian Lechner

  • Coping With Bullying at Work and Health Related Problems

    Francine Dehue;Catherine Bolman;Trijntje Völlink;Mieneke Pouwelse

  • Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in relation to adolescents' perception of parenting.

    Francine Dehue;Catherine Bolman;Trijntje Vollink;Mieneke Pouwelse

  • Short-term effectiveness of a web-based tailored intervention for cancer survivors on quality of life, anxiety, depression, and fatigue: randomized controlled trial

    Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters;Iris M. Kanera

  • Cancer survivors in the first year after treatment: the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in different domains

    Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters;Iris M. Kanera

  • Short-term efficacy of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention for prostate and colorectal cancer patients and survivors : a randomized controlled trial

    Rianne Henrica Johanna Golsteijn;Catherine Bolman;Esmee Volders;Denise Astrid Peels

  • Long-term effects of a web-based cancer aftercare intervention on moderate physical activity and vegetable consumption among early cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

    Iris M. Kanera;Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters

  • The long-term efficacy of two computer-tailored physical activity interventions for older adults: Main effects and mediators.

    Maartje M. van Stralen;Hein de Vries;Aart N. Mudde;Catherine Bolman

  • Preventing smoking relapse via Web-based computer-tailored feedback: a randomized controlled trial.

    Iman Elfeddali;Catherine Bolman;Math J J M Candel;Reinout W Wiers

  • Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: results after 6 months.

    Fam Te Poel;Catherine Bolman;Catherine Bolman;Astrid Reubsaet;Hein de Vries

  • Factors related to misperception of physical activity in The Netherlands and implications for health promotion programmes

    L Lechner;C Bolman;MH Van Dijke

  • The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation

    Hein de Vries;Sander M Eggers;Catherine Bolman

  • A minimal-contact intervention for cardiac inpatients: long-term effects on smoking cessation.

    Catherine Bolman;Hein de Vries;Gerard van Breukelen

  • Workplace mobbing and bystanders' helping behaviour towards victims: the role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association.

    Roelie Mulder;Mieneke Pouwelse;Hein Lodewijkx;Catherine Bolman

  • Efficacy of Two Tailored Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in Older Adults

    Maartje M. van Stralen;Maartje M. van Stralen;Hein de Vries;Aart N. Mudde;Catherine Bolman

  • Adherence to prophylactic asthma medication: Habit strength and cognitions

    Catherine Bolman;Titia G. Arwert;Trijntje Völlink

  • Lifestyle-related effects of the web-based Kanker Nazorg Wijzer (Cancer Aftercare Guide) intervention for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

    Iris M. Kanera;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Roy A. Willems;Ilse Mesters

Frequent Co-Authors

Lilian Lechner
Lilian Lechner The Open University
Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Anke Oenema
Anke Oenema Maastricht University
Math J. J. M. Candel
Math J. J. M. Candel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Marc C. Willemsen
Marc C. Willemsen Maastricht University
José Janssen
José Janssen Open University in the Netherlands
Herman P. Schaalma
Herman P. Schaalma Maastricht University
Bart van den Borne
Bart van den Borne Maastricht University
Rob Koper
Rob Koper Open University in the Netherlands

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a future in psychology, exploring online degrees can open doors to various professional opportunities. Many students start with a bachelor’s degree in psychology or a related field before advancing to online master’s or doctoral programs. These degrees are often a key requirement for licensure as a counselor or therapist in the United States.

Each state sets its own standards for therapist licensure. It’s important to research the requirements for your area. For example, students interested in practicing in Nevada should review the Las Vegas licensed therapist education requirements. Similarly, those planning to practice in Kentucky will want to understand the specific process for becoming a licensed therapist in Lexington.

In Nebraska, following the Lincoln licensed therapist education requirements is crucial, while California students should learn how to become a licensed therapist in Long Beach. Each pathway varies in coursework, supervised experience, and exams, so it’s vital to choose a degree program tailored to your state’s expectations and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Bolman

Trending Scientists