World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
10287
World Ranking
3749
National Ranking
402

Lilian Lechner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lilian Lechner sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lilian Lechner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lilian Lechner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lilian Lechner is affiliated with The Open University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple domains within medicine and psychology, with a particular focus on physical activity and health, behavioral health interventions, and mobile health technologies.

The main fields of study covered by their work include Medicine and Psychology. Subfields of their research activity are General Health Professions, Physiology, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

Their research topics cover a range of areas, including:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Cancer Survivorship and Care
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Technology Use by Older Adults

Lilian Lechner has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. Some recent papers include:

  • The facilitators and barriers of mHealth adoption and use among people with a low socio-economic position: A scoping review (2023, Digital Health)
  • Long-Term Effects on Loneliness of a Computer-Tailored Intervention for Older Adults With Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Controlled Trial (2021, Journal of Aging and Health)
  • The Effect of Active Plus, a Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention, on the Physical Activity of Older Adults with Chronic Illness(es)-A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health)
  • Equity-specific effects of interventions to promote physical activity among middle-aged and older adults: results from applying a novel equity-specific re-analysis strategy (2021, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity)
  • Determinants of physical activity behaviour change in (online) interventions, and gender-specific differences: a Bayesian network model (2022, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • JMIR Formative Research
  • http://isrctn.com/
  • Digital Health
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Internet Interventions

Lilian Lechner has collaborated extensively with other researchers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Catherine Bolman
  • Denise A. Peels
  • Eline H. G. M. Collombon
  • Esmee Volders
  • Tessi M Hengst

Best Publications

  • Web-based tailored nutrition education: results of a randomized controlled trial

    A. Oenema;J. Brug;L. Lechner

  • Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: a literature review

    Maartje M. van Stralen;Hein De Vries;Aart N. Mudde;Catherine Bolman

  • Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable consumption.

    Johannes Brug;Lilian Lechner;Hein De Vries

  • Definite involuntary childlessness: associations between coping, social support and psychological distress

    Lilian Lechner;C. Bolman;A. van Dalen

  • Gratitude and health: An updated review

    Lilian Jans-Beken;Nele Jacobs;Mayke Janssens;Sanne Peeters

  • Gezondheidsvoorlichting en gedragsverandering

    J. Brug;P. Assema;L. Lechner

  • A qualitative study on detecting cancer symptoms and seeking medical help; an application of Andersen's model of total patient delay

    Jascha de Nooijer;Lilian Lechner;Lilian Lechner;Hein de Vries

  • Profiling physical activity motivation based on self-determination theory: a cluster analysis approach

    Stijn Ah Friederichs;Catherine Bolman;Anke Oenema;Lilian Lechner

  • The role of illness representations in coping and health of patients treated for breast cancer.

    Hetje Rozema;Trijntje Völlink;Lilian Lechner

  • Participation in a Breast Cancer Screening Program: Influence of Past Behavior and Determinants on Future Screening Participation

    Lilian Lechner;Hein de Vries;Nicole Offermans

  • Misconceptions of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Differences between Objective and Subjective Estimation of Intake

    Lilian Lechner;Johannes Brug;Hein De Vries

  • Stages of change for fruit, vegetable and fat intake: consequences of misconception

    Lilian Lechner;Johannes Brug;Hein De Vries;Patricia van Assema

  • Short-term effectiveness of a web-based tailored intervention for cancer survivors on quality of life, anxiety, depression, and fatigue: randomized controlled trial

    Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters;Iris M. Kanera

  • Patient and provider perspectives on HIV and HIV-related stigma in Dutch health care settings.

    Sarah E. Stutterheim;Lenneke Sicking;Ronald Brands;Ineke Baas

  • Care needs after primary breast cancer treatment. Survivors' associated sociodemographic and medical characteristics

    Evelyn E. J. Pauwels;Caroline Charlier;Caroline Charlier;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;Lilian Lechner

  • Cancer survivors in the first year after treatment: the prevalence and correlates of unmet needs in different domains

    Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters;Iris M. Kanera

  • Measuring risk perceptions of skin cancer: Reliability and validity of different operationalizations

    Eva Janssen;Liesbeth van Osch;Hein de Vries;Lilian Lechner

  • Short-term efficacy of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention for prostate and colorectal cancer patients and survivors : a randomized controlled trial

    Rianne Henrica Johanna Golsteijn;Catherine Bolman;Esmee Volders;Denise Astrid Peels

  • Relapse prevention in a national smoking cessation contest: Effects of coping planning

    Liesbeth van Osch;Lilian Lechner;Astrid Reubsaet;Stefan Wigger

  • Long-term effects of a web-based cancer aftercare intervention on moderate physical activity and vegetable consumption among early cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

    Iris M. Kanera;Roy A. Willems;Catherine A. W. Bolman;Ilse Mesters

  • The long-term efficacy of two computer-tailored physical activity interventions for older adults: Main effects and mediators.

    Maartje M. van Stralen;Hein de Vries;Aart N. Mudde;Catherine Bolman

  • Factors related to misperception of physical activity in The Netherlands and implications for health promotion programmes

    L Lechner;C Bolman;MH Van Dijke

Frequent Co-Authors

Hein de Vries
Hein de Vries Maastricht University
Catherine Bolman
Catherine Bolman The Open University
Anke Oenema
Anke Oenema Maastricht University
Math J. J. M. Candel
Math J. J. M. Candel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Gerjo Kok
Gerjo Kok Maastricht University
Arjan E. R. Bos
Arjan E. R. Bos The Open University
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen
Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen Maastricht University
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Ghent University
Stef P. J. Kremers
Stef P. J. Kremers Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens diverse online learning options and career pathways tailored to your interests. One popular route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which requires specialized education and supervised experience. The Cleveland bcba education requirements highlight the importance of accredited master’s programs and state-specific licensing requirements.

Many regions have unique expectations. For example, the Colorado Springs bcba education requirements emphasize practical training through internships and hands-on practice, while details about becoming a bcba in Columbus outline the value of choosing programs with strong faculty supervision.

If you’re looking for expanded online study opportunities, the guide to becoming a bcba in Corpus Christi discusses online coursework options and pathways that align with local professional standards. Whether you choose clinical work, research, or another psychology career, understanding these regional and online routes will help you make informed decisions about your educational future.

Best Scientists Citing Lilian Lechner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles