World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7866
World Ranking
8771
National Ranking
884

Mark Rubin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Rubin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Rubin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Rubin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Rubin is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with significant contributions in Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The scientist's work addresses several core topics, including:

  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Philosophy and History of Science
  • Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Mark Rubin has published in various academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • European Journal of Social Psychology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Synthese
  • International Journal of Mental Health Nursing

Notable recent papers by Mark Rubin include:

  • "When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing" (2021) - Synthese
  • "Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests" (2022) - Philosophical Psychology

Other high-impact papers relevant to the broader research context they contribute to include:

  • "Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries" (2020) - Assessment
  • "Workplace stress and resilience in the Australian nursing workforce: A comprehensive integrative review" (2020) - International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
  • "Subjective status and perceived legitimacy across countries" (2020) - European Journal of Social Psychology

Mark Rubin frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Chuma Kevin Owuamalam
  • Russell Spears
  • Luca Caricati
  • Olivia Evans
  • Samineh Sanatkar

Best Publications

  • Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification

    Mark Rubin;Miles Hewstone

  • The Contact Caveat Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice

    Fiona Kate Barlow;Stefania Paolini;Anne Pedersen;Matthew J. Hornsey

  • Negative Intergroup Contact Makes Group Memberships Salient: Explaining Why Intergroup Conflict Endures

    Stefania Paolini;Jake Harwood;Mark Rubin

  • Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries

    Sylvie Graf;Stefania Paolini;Mark Rubin

  • Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries:

    Cristian Zanon;Rachel E Brenner;Makilim N Baptista;David L Vogel

  • Social Identity, System Justification, and Social Dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al.

    Mark Rubin;Miles Hewstone

  • Social class differences in social integration among students in higher education: a meta-analysis and recommendations for future research.

    Mark Rubin

  • “I Am Working-Class”: Subjective Self-Definition as a Missing Measure of Social Class and Socioeconomic Status in Higher Education Research

    Mark Rubin;Nida Denson;Sue Kilpatrick;Kelly E. Matthews

  • Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present

    Stefania Paolini;Jake Harwood;Mark Rubin;Shenel Husnu

  • Secondary transfer effects from imagined contact: Group similarity affects the generalization gradient

    Jake Harwood;Stefania Paolini;Nick Joyce;Mark Rubin

  • Do p values lose their meaning in exploratory analyses? It depends how you define the familywise error rate.

    Mark Rubin

  • When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress.

    Mark Rubin

  • Does Multiple Categorization Reduce Intergroup Bias

    Richard J. Crisp;Miles Hewstone;Mark Rubin

  • Workplace stress and resilience in the Australian nursing workforce: A comprehensive integrative review.

    Eric Badu;Anthony Paul O’Brien;Rebecca Mitchell;Mark Rubin

  • A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants

    Mark Rubin;Stefania Paolini;Richard J. Crisp

  • Stigma of seeking psychological services: examining college students across ten countries/regions

    David L. Vogel;Haley A. Strass;Patrick J. Heath;Fatima R. Al-Darmaki

  • Towards a Clearer Understanding of Social Identity Theory’s Self-Esteem Hypothesis

    Sarah E. Martiny;Mark Rubin

  • Time and money explain social class differences in students’ social integration at university

    Mark Rubin;Chrysalis L. Wright

  • Immigrants’ social integration as a function of approach–avoidance orientation and problem-solving style

    Mark Rubin;Susan E Watt;Marcella Ramelli

  • Revisiting 25 years of system motivation explanation for system justification from the perspective of social identity model of system attitudes

    Chuma Kevin Owuamalam;Mark Rubin;Russell Spears

  • They’re All the Same!. . . but for Several Different Reasons A Review of the Multicausal Nature of Perceived Group Variability

    Mark Rubin;Constantina Badea

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell Spears
Russell Spears University of Groningen
Miles Hewstone
Miles Hewstone University of Oxford
Richard J. Crisp
Richard J. Crisp Durham University
Jake Harwood
Jake Harwood University of Arizona
Alberto Voci
Alberto Voci University of Padua
David L. Vogel
David L. Vogel Iowa State University
Corey S. Mackenzie
Corey S. Mackenzie University of Manitoba
Frances Kay-Lambkin
Frances Kay-Lambkin University of Newcastle Australia
Nathaniel G. Wade
Nathaniel G. Wade Iowa State University
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of advanced academic and professional options. Many students interested in applied behavior analysis choose to enroll in online bcba certification programs, which offer flexibility for working professionals and prepare graduates for Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) credentials.

For those aiming to fast-track their careers while broadening their expertise, combined master's and psyd programs provide an efficient path to licensure and a doctorate in psychology. These integrative programs are well-suited for students looking to balance practical training with advanced knowledge.

If your interests lie in the scientific study of human development, pursuing a phd in developmental psychology can lead to impactful research roles, teaching opportunities, or specialized positions in clinics and nonprofits.

For a broad range of research or clinical careers, a variety of phd programs for psychology are available across the U.S. These programs offer tailored specializations, from cognitive neuroscience to counseling psychology, letting you align your studies with your career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Rubin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles