World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
43
Citations
15511
World Ranking
7087
National Ranking
3828

Nathaniel G. Wade publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel G. Wade sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nathaniel G. Wade D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel G. Wade sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathaniel G. Wade is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. The professional focus centers on psychology, particularly within several subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, and general health professions.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics such as forgiveness and related behaviors, mental health research topics, mental health treatment and access, grief, bereavement, and mental health, counseling practices and supervision, religion, spirituality, and psychology, as well as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Notable recent publications include:

  • Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries, 2020, Assessment
  • Apology and Restitution: Offender Accountability Responses Influence Victim Empathy and Forgiveness, 2020, Journal of Psychology and Theology
  • New horizons in group psychotherapy research and practice from third wave positive psychology: a practice-friendly review, 2022, Research in Psychotherapy Psychopathology Process and Outcome
  • Feasibility of an Exercise and CBT Intervention for Treatment of Depression: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial, 2022, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Magnitude, timing and duration of mood state and cognitive effects of acute moderate exercise in major depressive disorder, 2022, Psychology of sport and exercise

Frequent co-authors of Nathaniel G. Wade include:

  • David L. Vogel
  • Jacob D. Meyer
  • Rachel E. Brenner
  • Thomas A. Murray
  • Jeni E. Lansing

Publication venues where this researcher has frequently contributed are:

  • Stigma and Health
  • Psychology of Sport and Exercise
  • Trials
  • Spirituality in Clinical Practice
  • International Journal of Group Psychotherapy

Best Publications

  • Measuring the Self-Stigma Associated With Seeking Psychological Help

    David L. Vogel;Nathaniel G. Wade;Shawn Haake

  • The Religious Commitment Inventory--10: Development, Refinement, and Validation of a Brief Scale for Research and Counseling.

    Everett L. Worthington Jr.;Nathaniel G. Wade;Terry L. Hight;Jennifer S. Ripley

  • Perceived public stigma and the willingness to seek counseling: The mediating roles of self-stigma and attitudes toward counseling.

    David L. Vogel;Nathaniel G. Wade;Ashley H. Hackler

  • Forgivingness, Vengeful Rumination, and Affective Traits

    Jack W. Berry;Everett L. Worthington;Lynn E. O'Connor;Les Parrott

  • The psychology of unforgiveness and forgiveness and implications for clinical practice

    Everett L. Worthington;Nathaniel G. Wade

  • Dispositional Forgivingness: Development and Construct Validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF)

    Jack W. Berry;Everett L. Worthington;Les Parrott;Lynn E. O’Connor

  • Is stigma internalized? The longitudinal impact of public stigma on self-stigma.

    David L. Vogel;Rachel L. Bitman;Joseph H. Hammer;Nathaniel G. Wade

  • Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness: a meta-analysis.

    Nathaniel G. Wade;William T. Hoyt;Julia E. M. Kidwell;Everett L. Worthington Jr.

  • Thankful for the little things: A meta-analysis of gratitude interventions

    Don E. Davis;Elise Choe;Joel Meyers;Nathaniel Wade

  • Seeking help from a mental health professional: The influence of one's social network

    David L. Vogel;Nathaniel G. Wade;Stephen R. Wester;Lisa Larson

  • Religion and spirituality in psychotherapy: a practice-friendly review of research.

    Brian C. Post;Nathaniel G. Wade

  • Overcoming Interpersonal Offenses: Is Forgiveness the Only Way to Deal With Unforgiveness?

    Nathaniel G. Wade;Everett L. Worthington

  • Measuring Perceptions of Stigmatization by Others for Seeking Psychological Help: Reliability and Validity of a New Stigma Scale With College Students

    David L. Vogel;Nathaniel G. Wade;Paul L. Ascheman

  • In Search of a Common Core: A Content Analysis of Interventions to Promote Forgiveness.

    Nathaniel G. Wade;Everett L. Worthington Jr.

  • Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale–21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries:

    Cristian Zanon;Rachel E Brenner;Makilim N Baptista;David L Vogel

  • Disentangling self-stigma: are mental illness and help-seeking self-stigmas different?

    Jeritt R. Tucker;Joseph H. Hammer;David L. Vogel;Rachel L. Bitman

  • But Do They Work? A Meta-Analysis of Group Interventions to Promote Forgiveness

    Nathaniel G. Wade;Everett L. Worthington;Julia E. Meyer

  • Effectiveness of religiously tailored interventions in Christian therapy

    Nathaniel G. Wade;Everett L. Worthington;David L. Vogel

  • Psychology of Religion

    Psych x;Nathaniel Wade

  • Predictors of the change in self-stigma following a single session of group counseling.

    Nathaniel G. Wade;Brian C. Post;Marilyn A. Cornish;David L. Vogel

  • Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training

    N. G. Wade;C. V. Johnson;J. E. Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Vogel
David L. Vogel Iowa State University
Everett L. Worthington
Everett L. Worthington Virginia Commonwealth University
John W. Berry
John W. Berry Queen's University
Steven J. Sandage
Steven J. Sandage Boston University
Wendy Kliewer
Wendy Kliewer Virginia Commonwealth University
William T. Hoyt
William T. Hoyt University of Wisconsin–Madison
Joshua N. Hook
Joshua N. Hook University of North Texas
Corey S. Mackenzie
Corey S. Mackenzie University of Manitoba
Don E. Davis
Don E. Davis Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of psychology offers a variety of online degree options and career pathways to suit different interests and goals. For those new to the field, an associates in psychology psychology program can provide foundational knowledge and open doors to entry-level roles or continued study.

Advancing your education can lead to more professional opportunities. Earning an accredited online bachelor's degree in psychology is a popular next step, preparing graduates for roles in human services, research, or further graduate study.

If your interest lies in understanding behavior, there are specialized behavioral psychology degree programs available online. These programs focus on behavioral analysis, therapy, and interventions that are highly valued in educational and clinical settings.

For those seeking leadership or consultancy careers, pursuing a doctor of philosophy in industrial and organizational psychology can lead to advanced positions in organizational development, executive coaching, and research.

With so many accredited online pathways, you can tailor your psychology education to fit your aspirations—whether you’re starting out or aiming for a specialized or senior role.

Best Scientists Citing Nathaniel G. Wade

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles