World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
66
Citations
21211
World Ranking
955
National Ranking
71

Fran Baum publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fran Baum sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 422 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Fran Baum D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fran Baum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fran Baum is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields including Health Professions and Social Sciences. Within these broad categories, their work particularly focuses on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics covered in Baum's research address Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology, Health disparities and outcomes, Employment and Welfare Studies, Global Health Care Issues, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations, and Global Health Workforce Issues.

Baum has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include the International Journal of Health Policy and Management, BMJ, Health Promotion Journal of Australia, Health Promotion International, and Social Science & Medicine.

Their recent academic papers include:

  • "Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health," 2021, BMJ
  • "Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health," 2023, The Lancet
  • "The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies," 2020, The Economic and Labour Relations Review
  • "Explaining covid-19 performance: what factors might predict national responses?," 2021, BMJ
  • "A glossary of theories for understanding power and policy for health equity," 2020, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health

Frequent collaborators in Baum's work include Toby Freeman, Sharon Friel, Connie Musolino, M. Fisher, and Tamara Mackean. The volume of joint publications suggests ongoing research partnerships within their academic network.

Best Publications

  • Participatory action research

    Fran Baum;Colin James MacDougall;Danielle Smith

  • The new public health.

    Frances Baum

  • Researching public health: Behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate

    Frances Baum

  • Defining and conceptualising the commercial determinants of health

    Unknown

  • Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health.

    Lauren Paremoer;Sulakshana Nandi;Hani Serag;Fran Baum;Fran Baum

  • Neighbourhood life and social capital: the implications for health

    Anna M Ziersch;Fran E Baum;Colin MacDougall;Christine Putland

  • Why Behavioural Health Promotion Endures Despite Its Failure to Reduce Health Inequities

    Fran Baum;Matthew Fisher

  • The new public health : an Australian perspective

    Frances Baum

  • Social capital: is it good for your health? Issues for a public health agenda.

    F Baum

  • 'Opportunity structures': urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia.

    Fran Baum;Catherine Palmer

  • Epidemiology of participation: an Australian community study

    Frances E Baum;Robert A Bush;Carolyn C Modra;Charlie J Murray

  • The COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons on building more equal and sustainable societies

    Kristin van Barneveld;Michael Quinlan;Peter Kriesler;Anne Junor

  • Changes Not for the Fainthearted: Reorienting Health Care Systems Toward Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health

    Fran E. Baum;Monique Begin;Tanja A. J. J. Houweling;Sebastian Taylor

  • Cracking the nut of health equity: top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health.

    Frances Baum

  • Do perceived neighbourhood cohesion and safety contribute to neighbourhood differences in health

    Fran E. Baum;Anna M. Ziersch;Guangyu Zhang;Katy Osborne

  • Social capital and health in rural and urban communities in South Australia

    Anna M Ziersch;Fran Baum;I Gusti Ngurah Darmawan;Anne M Kavanagh

  • Health promoting hospitals: a typology of different organizational approaches to health promotion

    Anne Johnson;Frances Baum

  • The Social Determinants of Mental Health: Implications for Research and Health Promotion

    Matthew Fisher;Fran Baum

  • The Devil's Advocate: A Strategy to Avoid Groupthink and Stimulate Discussion in Focus Groups:

    Colin MacDougall;Frances Baum

  • Involvement in civil society groups: is it good for your health?

    Anna Marie Ziersch;Fran Baum

  • Challenging the Stigma of Public Housing: Preliminary Findings from a Qualitative Study in South Australia

    Catherine Palmer;Anna Ziersch;Kathy Arthurson;Fran Baum

  • Community Health Worker Programs to Improve Healthcare Access and Equity: Are They Only Relevant to Low- and Middle-Income Countries?

    Sara Javanparast;Alice Windle;Toby Freeman;Fran Baum

Frequent Co-Authors

Toby Freeman
Toby Freeman University of Adelaide
Anna Ziersch
Anna Ziersch Flinders University
Sharon Friel
Sharon Friel Australian National University
Ronald Labonté
Ronald Labonté University of Ottawa
David Sanders
David Sanders University of the Western Cape
Elizabeth Harris
Elizabeth Harris University of New South Wales
Jennie Popay
Jennie Popay Lancaster University
Anne W. Taylor
Anne W. Taylor University of Adelaide
Lynn Kemp
Lynn Kemp University of Sydney
Lyndall Strazdins
Lyndall Strazdins Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of flexible, online academic options. Many students now look for cheap psychology masters programs to gain valuable credentials without the burden of high tuition fees. These affordable paths can lead to careers in counseling, HR, and social services.

For those aiming to fast-track their professional growth, accelerated online degrees are increasingly popular. Whether you want to enter the workforce quickly or shift your career trajectory, accelerated programs offer intensive coursework that shortens graduation times while maintaining a rigorous academic standard.

Some students prefer shorter, targeted education, like the shortest edd program online, which opens pathways to educational leadership roles in less time. Similarly, students can find online master degree programs lasting just one year—ideal for those eager to specialize or advance their careers quickly.

With the rise of respected online degrees and flexible study modes, it's easier than ever to pursue a field in Social Sciences and Humanities while balancing work and life commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Fran Baum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles