World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Billie Giles-Corti

Billie Giles-Corti

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 107 6199 5833 173 168 406 46389

Billie Giles-Corti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Billie Giles-Corti between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Billie Giles-Corti published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2014. 16 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2014. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 31 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 35 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 35 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 7 publications
1998 2025

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Billie Giles-Corti: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 4
2000 6
2001 9
2002 11
2003 17
2004 9
2005 13
2006 12
2007 11
2008 24
2009 13
2010 31
2011 18
2012 24
2013 35
2014 41
2015 35
2016 35
2017 28
2018 29
2019 22
2020 15
2021 18
2022 19
2023 8
2024 9
2025 7
Total 504
Download as CSV

Billie Giles-Corti publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Billie Giles-Corti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 406 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 406
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Billie Giles-Corti D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Billie Giles-Corti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 107
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Billie Giles-Corti is affiliated with RMIT University in Australia and has a significant body of research primarily situated within the Social Sciences. Their work focuses extensively on topics connected to urban transport, health, and sustainability, contributing over a hundred publications to these domains.

The main fields of study pursued include Social Sciences, with subfields such as Transportation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Health, Public Health (Environmental and Occupational Health), as well as Sociology and Political Science.

The key topics explored in their research are:

  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Among their recent publications are:

  • "An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health" (2021), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Defining pathways to healthy sustainable urban development" (2020), Environment International
  • "City planning policies to support health and sustainability: an international comparison of policy indicators for 25 cities" (2022), The Lancet Global Health
  • "Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities" (2022), The Lancet Global Health
  • "What next? Expanding our view of city planning and global health, and implementing and monitoring evidence-informed policy" (2022), The Lancet Global Health

Frequent co-authors in Billie Giles-Corti's work include Lucy Gunn, Carl Higgs, Afshin Jafari, Melanie Lowe, and Alan Both.

Their contributions are regularly published in notable venues such as The Lancet Global Health, Health & Place, Cities, arXiv (Cornell University), and the Journal of Transport & Health.

Best Publications

  • Increasing walking: How important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?

    Billie Giles-Corti;Melissa H. Broomhall;Matthew Knuiman;Catherine Collins

  • The relative influence of individual, social and physical environment determinants of physical activity.

    Billie Giles-Corti;Robert J Donovan

  • City planning and population health: a global challenge

    Billie Giles-Corti;Anne Vernez-Moudon;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Gavin Turrell;Gavin Turrell

  • How many steps/day are enough? for adults

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Wendy J Brown;Stacy A Clemes

  • Socioeconomic Status Differences in Recreational Physical Activity Levels and Real and Perceived Access to a Supportive Physical Environment

    Billie Giles-Corti;Robert J Donovan

  • Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?

    Takemi Sugiyama;Eva R. Leslie;Billie Giles-Corti;Neville Owen

  • Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling.

    Terri Pikora;Billie Giles-Corti;Fiona Bull;Fiona Bull;Konrad Jamrozik;Konrad Jamrozik

  • Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school.

    Anna Timperio;Kylie Ball;Jo Salmon;Rebecca Roberts

  • The ABC of physical activity for health: A consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences

    Gary O'Donovan;Anthony J Blazevich;Colin Boreham;Ashley R Cooper

  • Understanding physical activity environmental correlates : increased specificity for ecological models

    Billie Giles-Corti;Anna Timperio;Fiona Bull;Terri Pikora

  • Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking

    Billie Giles-Corti;Robert J. Donovan

  • The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings

    Samantha Foster;Billie Giles-Corti

  • Developing a reliable audit instrument to measure the physical environment for physical activity

    Terri J Pikora;Fiona C.L Bull;Konrad Jamrozik;Konrad Jamrozik;Matthew Knuiman

  • The pet connection: Pets as a conduit for social capital?

    Lisa Wood;Billie Giles-Corti;Mahesh Bulsara

  • Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities.

    Mark Stevenson;Mark Stevenson;Jason Thompson;Jason Thompson;Thiago Herick de Sa;Reid Ewing

  • Associations Between Recreational Walking and Attractiveness, Size, and Proximity of Neighborhood Open Spaces

    Takemi Sugiyama;Jacinta Francis;Nicholas J. Middleton;Neville Owen

  • Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design.

    Lisa Wood;Lawrence D. Frank;Billie Giles-Corti

  • Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change

    Tya Shannon;Billie Giles-Corti;Terri Pikora;Max K Bulsara

  • Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: Concepts, methods and research agenda

    Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Mohammad Javad Koohsari;Suzanne Mavoa;Karen Villanueva;Karen Villanueva;Takemi Sugiyama;Takemi Sugiyama

  • Environmental and Lifestyle Factors Associated with Overweight and Obesity in Perth, Australia:

    Billie Giles-Corti;Sally Macintyre;Johanna P. Clarkson;Terro Pikora

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Knuiman
Matthew Knuiman University of Western Australia
Hannah Badland
Hannah Badland RMIT University
Fiona Bull
Fiona Bull World Health Organization
Gavin Turrell
Gavin Turrell RMIT University
Hayley Christian
Hayley Christian University of Western Australia
Lisa Wood
Lisa Wood University of Newcastle Australia
Anna Timperio
Anna Timperio Deakin University
Paula Hooper
Paula Hooper University of Western Australia
Robert J. Donovan
Robert J. Donovan University of Western Australia
Takemi Sugiyama
Takemi Sugiyama Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are exploring alternative routes into healthcare beyond traditional U.S. medical schools, there are several flexible online degree options available. Many students consider online direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors as a fast-track to advanced practice nursing, especially for those with a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field. These programs can help you pivot into a healthcare career without starting from scratch.

For those looking for accessible entry points, exploring easy nursing schools to get into may provide more flexible admissions requirements, making it simpler to start your nursing journey. If sitting for standardized entrance exams is a concern, you might prefer nursing programs without teas and HESI requirements, which can streamline the application process.

Interested in the administrative side of healthcare? There are also excellent options for studying medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid. This path offers solid career potential and can be a stepping stone to broader healthcare roles. Each pathway provides unique benefits for those considering a healthcare career in the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Billie Giles-Corti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles