World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mikko Kurimo

Mikko Kurimo

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4946
World Ranking
11738
National Ranking
102

Mikko Kurimo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikko Kurimo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 331 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mikko Kurimo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikko Kurimo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mikko Kurimo is affiliated with Aalto University in Finland and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research predominantly focuses on areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

The scientist's main research topics include Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Topic Modeling, Speech and dialogue systems, Speech and Audio Processing, Music and Audio Processing, and Phonetics and Phonology Research.

Frequently publishing in a variety of scholarly venues, Mikko Kurimo has contributed notably to arXiv (Cornell University), Interspeech 2022, Computer Speech & Language, Speech Communication, and Language Resources and Evaluation.

Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Brain activity reflects the predictability of word sequences in listened continuous speech" (2020, NeuroImage)
  • "Advances in subword-based HMM-DNN speech recognition across languages" (2020, Computer Speech & Language)
  • "A formant modification method for improved ASR of children's speech" (2021, Speech Communication)
  • "Wav2vec2-based Paralinguistic Systems to Recognise Vocalised Emotions and Stuttering" (2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia)
  • "wav2vec2-based Speech Rating System for Children with Speech Sound Disorder" (2022, Interspeech 2022)

Mikko Kurimo's research collaborations include frequent co-authors such as Tamás Grósz, Yaroslav Getman, Hemant Kumar Kathania, Sudarsana Reddy Kadiri, and Mittul Singh.

Best Publications

  • ICASSP The IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)

    Hannu Pulakka;Ulpu Remes;Kalle Palomäki;Mikko Kurimo

  • Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition with morph language models applied to Finnish

    Teemu Hirsimäki;Mathias Creutz;Vesa Siivola;Mikko Kurimo

  • Morph-based speech recognition and modeling of out-of-vocabulary words across languages

    Mathias Creutz;Teemu Hirsimäki;Mikko Kurimo;Antti Puurula

  • Morfessor 2.0: Python Implementation and Extensions for Morfessor Baseline

    Sami Virpioja;Peter Smit;Stig-Arne Grönroos;Mikko Kurimo

  • An Augmented Reality Interface to Contextual Information

    Antti Ajanki;Mark Billinghurst;Hannes Gamper;Toni Jarvenpaa

  • Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access

    Carol Peters;Thomas Deselaers;Nicola Ferro;Julio Gonzalo

  • SpeechFind: advances in spoken document retrieval for a National Gallery of the Spoken Word

    J.H.L. Hansen;Rongqing Huang;Bowen Zhou;M. Seadle

  • Importance of High-Order N-Gram Models in Morph-Based Speech Recognition

    T. Hirsimaki;J. Pylkkonen;M. Kurimo

  • Morfessor 2.0: Toolkit for statistical morphological segmentation

    Peter Smit;Sami Virpioja;Stig-Arne Grönroos;Mikko Kurimo

  • Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, INTERSPEECH 2009

    Junichi Yamagishi;B. Usabaev;Simon King;Oliver Watts

  • Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition for agglutinative languages

    Mikko Kurimo;Antti Puurula;Ebru Arisoy;Vesa Siivola

  • Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition based on morphs discovered in an unsupervised manner

    Vesa Siivola;Teemu Hirsimäki;Mathias Johan Philip Creutz;Mikko Kurimo

  • Thousands of Voices for HMM-Based Speech Synthesis–Analysis and Application of TTS Systems Built on Various ASR Corpora

    Junichi Yamagishi;Bela Usabaev;Simon King;Oliver Watts

  • Morfessor FlatCat: An HMM-Based Method for Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Learning of Morphology

    Stig-Arne Grönroos;Sami Virpioja;Peter Smit;Mikko Kurimo

  • Duration Modeling Techniques for Continuous Speech Recognition

    Janne Pylkkönen;Mikko Kurimo

  • Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association

    Reima Karhila;Aku Rouhe;Peter Smit;Andre Mansikkaniemi

  • Supervised Morphological Segmentation in a Low-Resource Learning Setting using Conditional Random Fields

    Teemu Ruokolainen;Oskar Kohonen;Sami Virpioja;Mikko Kurimo

  • Fast latent semantic indexing of spoken documents by using self-organizing maps

    M. Kurimo

  • Overview and results of Morpho challenge 2009

    Mikko Kurimo;Sami Virpioja;Ville T. Turunen;Graeme W. Blackwood

  • On Lexicon Creation for Turkish LVCSR

    Kadri Hacioglu;Bryan L. Pellom;Tolga Çiloglu;Özlem Öztürk

  • Morpho Challenge 2005-2010: Evaluations and Results

    Mikko Kurimo;Sami Virpioja;Ville Turunen;Krista Lagus

  • Proceedings of the ACL 2010 System Demonstrations

    Mikko Kurimo;William Byrne;John Dines;Philip N. Garner

Frequent Co-Authors

Paavo Alku
Paavo Alku Aalto University
Jorma Laaksonen
Jorma Laaksonen Aalto University
Murat Saraclar
Murat Saraclar Boğaziçi University
William Byrne
William Byrne University of Cambridge
Keiichi Tokuda
Keiichi Tokuda Nagoya Institute of Technology
Samuel Kaski
Samuel Kaski Aalto University
Junichi Yamagishi
Junichi Yamagishi National Institute of Informatics
Mark Billinghurst
Mark Billinghurst University of South Australia
Jörg Tiedemann
Jörg Tiedemann University of Helsinki
Annamaria Mesaros
Annamaria Mesaros Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in computer science opens a range of flexible paths for students and working professionals. Those seeking quick progression may be interested in the fastest online master's degree programs, which allow learners to earn an advanced qualification in less time and move faster into high-demand IT careers.

If you’re deciding what program will best advance your career, consider the most useful masters degrees that employers are currently seeking. These programs focus on practical skills, data science, cybersecurity, and other in-demand fields.

Not ready for a bachelor’s or master’s? An associate degree online in computer science offers fundamental skills and a pathway to entry-level roles or further study, all with maximum flexibility for busy students.

No matter your route, finding affordable online degree programs can reduce debt and make it easier to invest in your tech career long-term. Online study lets you balance personal, professional, and academic goals efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Mikko Kurimo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles