World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 130 358 340 5 5 914 60100
Medicine 133 2242 2089 24 21 812 62555

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 26.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 99 publications in 2015. 1 of the 914 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 99. Peak 99 publications in 2015. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 32 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 51 publications 2008: 28 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 41 publications 2011: 77 publications 2012: 81 publications 2013: 68 publications 2014: 83 publications 2015: 99 publications 2016: 80 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 49 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

914 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 2
1996 3
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 8
2001 9
2002 14
2003 13
2004 16
2005 32
2006 24
2007 51
2008 28
2009 37
2010 41
2011 77
2012 81
2013 68
2014 83
2015 99
2016 80
2017 45
2018 49
2019 22
2020 9
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 914
Download as CSV

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 812 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 812
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 132–133 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168 133
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij is a researcher affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium. Their work primarily focuses on the intersections of physical activity, health, and behavioral interventions, with a significant presence in the fields of psychology, medicine, and health professions. Key subfields of their research include physiology, applied psychology, general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, and transportation.

The scientist has contributed notably to topics such as:

  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Among their publications, several papers stand out, including:

  • "Built Environment, Physical Activity, and Obesity: Findings from the International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Adult Study" (2020) published in Annual Review of Public Health
  • "Which behaviour change techniques are effective to promote physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in adults: a factorial randomized trial of an e- and m-health intervention" (2020) published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Content validity and methodological considerations in ecological momentary assessment studies on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review" (2020) published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • "Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study" (2020) published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • "Influences of Parental Snacking-Related Attitudes, Behaviours and Nutritional Knowledge on Young Children's Healthy and Unhealthy Snacking: The ToyBox Study" (2020) published in Nutrients

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • Annual Review of Public Health
  • Nutrients
  • BMC Public Health

Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij collaborates often with several coauthors. Most frequent collaborators include:

  • Delfien Van Dyck
  • Geert Crombez
  • Annick De Paepe
  • Laurent Degroote
  • Helene Schroé

Best Publications

  • Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study

    James F Sallis;Ester Cerin;Ester Cerin;Terry L Conway;Marc A Adams

  • How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations

    Catrine Tudor-Locke;Cora L Craig;Yukitoshi Aoyagi;Rhonda C Bell

  • Are health behavior change interventions that use online social networks effective? A systematic review.

    Carol A Maher;Lucy K Lewis;Katia Ferrar;Simon Marshall

  • Successful behavior change in obesity interventions in adults: a systematic review of self-regulation mediators

    Pedro J Teixeira;Eliana V Carraça;Marta M Marques;Harry Rutter

  • Determinants of eating behaviour in university students: a qualitative study using focus group discussions

    Tom Deliens;Peter Clarys;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;Benedicte Deforche;Benedicte Deforche

  • Neighborhood Environments and Physical Activity Among Adults in 11 Countries

    James F. Sallis;Heather R. Bowles;Adrian Bauman;Barbara E. Ainsworth

  • Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample

    Randall Rzewnicki;Yves Vanden Auweele;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

  • Increasing children's physical activity levels during recess periods in elementary schools: the effects of providing game equipment

    Stefanie J. M. Verstraete;Greet M. Cardon;Dirk L. R. De Clercq;Ilse M. M. De Bourdeaudhuij

  • Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: A systematic review

    Jelle Van Cauwenberg;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;Femke De Meester;Delfien Van Dyck

  • Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: systematic review of published and ‘grey’ literature

    Eveline Van Cauwenberghe;Lea Maes;Heleen Spittaels;Frank J. van Lenthe

  • Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity in a Sample of Belgian Adults

    Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;James F. Sallis;Brian E. Saelens

  • Physical Fitness and Physical Activity in Obese and Nonobese Flemish Youth

    Benedicte Deforche;Johan Lefevre;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;Andrew P. Hills

  • A meta-analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion.

    Ann DeSmet;Dimitri Van Ryckeghem;Sofie Compernolle;Tom Baranowski

  • Obesogenic environments: a systematic review of the association between the physical environment and adult weight status, the SPOTLIGHT project

    Joreintje D Mackenbach;Harry Rutter;Sofie Compernolle;Ketevan Glonti

  • Intrinsic Risk Factors for Inversion Ankle Sprains in Male Subjects A Prospective Study

    Tine Marieke Willems;Erik Witvrouw;Kim Delbaere;Nele Mahieu

  • Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in European Adolescents The HELENA Study

    Jonatan R. Ruiz;Francisco B. Ortega;David Martínez-Gómez;Idoia Labayen

  • Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review

    Veerle Van Holle;Benedicte Deforche;Benedicte Deforche;Jelle Van Cauwenberg;Liesbet Goubert

  • Toward the Development of a Pedagogical Model for Health-Based Physical Education

    Leen Haerens;David Kirk;Greet Cardon;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

  • A longitudinal analysis of gross motor coordination in overweight and obese children versus normal-weight peers.

    E D'Hondt;E D'Hondt;B Deforche;B Deforche;I Gentier;I Gentier;I De Bourdeaudhuij

  • Changes in weight, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary intake during the transition to higher education: a prospective study

    Benedicte Deforche;Benedicte Deforche;Delfien Van Dyck;Delfien Van Dyck;Tom Deliens;Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Frequent Co-Authors

Greet Cardon
Greet Cardon Ghent University
Jelle Van Cauwenberg
Jelle Van Cauwenberg Ghent University
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Lea Maes
Lea Maes Ghent University
Yannis Manios
Yannis Manios Harokopio University
Luis A. Moreno
Luis A. Moreno University of Zaragoza
Leen Haerens
Leen Haerens Ghent University
James F. Sallis
James F. Sallis University of California, San Diego
Neville Owen
Neville Owen Swinburne University of Technology
Dénes Molnár
Dénes Molnár University of Pecs

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to a wide range of additional healthcare qualifications and specialized career paths. Today, flexible online programs make it easier than ever to gain advanced credentials or shift into new healthcare fields alongside or after medical studies.

For those interested in healthcare leadership, consider the cheapest mha online programs to acquire essential administration and management skills. Nurses aiming for advanced clinical roles can benefit from the cheapest online dnp programs to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree affordably.

If your interests lean toward pharmaceuticals, pursuing the best online pharmacy school can open the path to becoming a Doctor of Pharmacy. Alternatively, you can specialize in digital health systems by enrolling in a health information technology online degree, a critical area as healthcare organizations increasingly rely on electronic data management.

These diverse degree options allow prospective medical professionals to tailor their education to fit their career aspirations—without sacrificing flexibility or affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles