World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Medicine
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Scientists 201 274 258 182 170 951 227611
Medicine 205 150 137 101 92 914 221948

James F. Sallis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James F. Sallis between 1969 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James F. Sallis published across 57 years, from 1969 to 2025, averaging 18.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2012. 27 of the 1,044 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2012. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 7 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 6 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 10 publications 1989: 15 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 26 publications 1998: 30 publications 1999: 31 publications 2000: 33 publications 2001: 24 publications 2002: 38 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 29 publications 2005: 37 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 29 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 33 publications 2011: 39 publications 2012: 58 publications 2013: 32 publications 2014: 34 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 40 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 20 publications
1969 2025

1,044 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James F. Sallis: publications per year, 1969 to 2025
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 7
1981 3
1982 1
1983 3
1984 1
1985 6
1986 10
1987 10
1988 10
1989 15
1990 12
1991 11
1992 15
1993 21
1994 17
1995 7
1996 11
1997 26
1998 30
1999 31
2000 33
2001 24
2002 38
2003 18
2004 29
2005 37
2006 29
2007 29
2008 26
2009 33
2010 33
2011 39
2012 58
2013 32
2014 34
2015 42
2016 40
2017 37
2018 33
2019 23
2020 25
2021 32
2022 27
2023 16
2024 7
2025 20
Total 1,044
Download as CSV

James F. Sallis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Sallis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 901–920 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 914 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145 914
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James F. Sallis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Sallis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 204–205 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 205 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10 205
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Medicine in United States Leader Award

Overview

James F. Sallis is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans medicine and social sciences, with a focus on fields such as transportation, public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, and health-related toxicology and mutagenesis.

The scientist's research topics prominently address urban transport and accessibility, obesity, physical activity, diet, physical activity and health, health disparities and outcomes, urban green space and health, noise effects and management, and traffic and road safety.

Recent papers by James F. Sallis include:

  • "Physical inactivity is associated with a higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes: a study in 48 440 adult patients" (2021) published in British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • "An international physical activity and public health research agenda to inform coronavirus disease-2019 policies and practices" (2020) published in Journal of Sport and Health Science
  • "An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health" (2021) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Built Environment, Physical Activity, and Obesity: Findings from the International Physical Activity and Environment Network (IPEN) Adult Study" (2020) published in Annual Review of Public Health
  • "City planning policies to support health and sustainability: an international comparison of policy indicators for 25 cities" (2022) published in The Lancet Global Health

James F. Sallis collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Howard Frumkin, Ross C. Brownson, Matthew L. Boulton, Robert B. Wallace, and Patrick Remington. Each of these co-authors has contributed to numerous joint publications with Sallis.

The scientist's work appears across notable publication venues, particularly in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, UNC Libraries, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, The Lancet Global Health, and Health & Place.

The areas of study and topics covered by this scientist highlight the intersection of urban planning, physical activity, and public health. The research emphasizes how built environments and urban nature influence health outcomes, obesity, physical activity, and sustainability. The work also reflects significant attention to public health policy related to disease prevention and health disparities within urban settings.

Best Publications

  • International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity

    Cora L Craig;Alison L Marshall;Michael Sjöström;Adrian E Bauman

  • Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine

    Russell R. Pate;Michael Pratt;Steven N. Blair;William L. Haskell

  • A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents.

    James F. Sallis;Judith J. Prochaska;Wendell C. Taylor

  • Compendium of physical activities: classification of energy costs of human physical activities.

    Barbara E. Ainsworth;William L. Haskell;Arthur S Leon;David R Jacobs

  • Ecological models of health behavior.

    James F. Sallis;Neville Owen;Edwin B. Fisher

  • Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?

    Adrian Bauman;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;Rodrigo Siqueira Reis;James F. Sallis;Jonathan C. K. Wells

  • Correlates of adults' participation in physical activity: review and update.

    Stewart G. Trost;Neville Owen;Adrian E. Bauman;James F. Sallis

  • Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures

    Brian E. Saelens;James F. Sallis;Lawrence D. Frank

  • AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update Consensus Panel Guide to Comprehensive Risk Reduction for Adult Patients Without Coronary or Other Atherosclerotic Vascular Diseases

    Thomas A. Pearson;Steven N. Blair;Stephen R. Daniels;Robert H. Eckel

  • Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine

    Neville G. Owen;James F. Sallis

  • Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation

    Brian E. Saelens;James F. Sallis;Jennifer B. Black;Dungtsa Chen

  • PHYSICAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY IN THE FIVE-CITY PROJECT

    James F. Sallis;William L. Haskell;Peter D. Wood;Stephen P. Fortmann

  • Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth.

    Stewart G. Trost;Russell R. Pate;James F. Sallis;Patty S. Freedson

  • Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ.

    Lawrence D. Frank;Thomas L. Schmid;James F. Sallis;James Chapman

  • The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors

    James F. Sallis;Robin M. Grossman;Robin B. Pinski;Thomas L. Patterson

  • ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLICY INTERVENTIONS TO PROMOTE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

    James F. Sallis;Adrian Bauman;Michael Pratt

  • Physical Education's Role in Public Health

    James F. Sallis;Thomas L. McKenzie

  • The determinants of physical activity and exercise

    R K Dishman;J F Sallis;D R Orenstein

  • Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda

    Neville Owen;Nancy Humpel;Eva Leslie;Adrian E. Bauman

  • Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality

    Lawrence D. Frank;James F. Sallis;Terry L. Conway;James E. Chapman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian E. Saelens
Brian E. Saelens Seattle Children's Hospital
Lawrence D. Frank
Lawrence D. Frank University of California, San Diego
Jacqueline Kerr
Jacqueline Kerr University of California, San Diego
Thomas L. McKenzie
Thomas L. McKenzie San Diego State University
Neville Owen
Neville Owen Swinburne University of Technology
John P. Elder
John P. Elder San Diego State University
Ester Cerin
Ester Cerin Australian Catholic University
Gregory J. Norman
Gregory J. Norman Dexcom (United States)
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career paths, many of which now offer flexible online learning options. For those interested in direct patient care, lpn to rn programs without teas test allow licensed practical nurses to become registered nurses—often bypassing standardized entrance tests like the TEAS. This streamlines advancement for working professionals.

If you're drawn to the business side of healthcare, a degree in healthcare administration can prepare you for leadership and management roles in a fast-growing industry. These accelerated online programs offer the flexibility to balance studies with work commitments.

For registered nurses aiming for advanced practice, rn to fnp programs provide a bridge pathway toward becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. Students can move on from an associate degree in nursing (ADN) to a master's level credential, increasing their scope of practice and earning potential.

Finally, those interested in food, wellness, and preventative care may consider an online nutrition degree. This field combines science, counseling, and healthcare with growing opportunities both in clinical and community settings.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Sallis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles