World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5903 5546 3163 2934 342 57468

Brian E. Saelens publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brian E. Saelens between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brian E. Saelens published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 38 publications in 2012. 12 of the 384 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 38. Peak 38 publications in 2012. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1995 2026

384 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brian E. Saelens: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 6
2001 4
2002 6
2003 7
2004 3
2005 10
2006 6
2007 11
2008 11
2009 13
2010 9
2011 21
2012 38
2013 19
2014 22
2015 20
2016 18
2017 24
2018 25
2019 19
2020 15
2021 17
2022 19
2023 9
2024 12
2025 11
2026 1
Total 384
Download as CSV

Brian E. Saelens publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian E. Saelens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 341–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 342 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922 342
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Brian E. Saelens D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian E. Saelens sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brian E. Saelens is affiliated with Seattle Children's Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Social Sciences, with significant contributions in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Transportation, General Health Professions, Physiology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work emphasizes various topics including obesity, physical activity, and diet; urban transport and accessibility; physical activity and health; eating disorders and behaviors; health disparities and outcomes; food security and health in diverse populations; and traffic and road safety.

Brian E. Saelens has published extensively in several venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Health & Place
  • Journal of Transport & Health
  • Obesity
  • Preventive Medicine Reports

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Brian E. Saelens include:

  • Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Dietary Intervention Improves Blood Pressure and Vascular Health in Youth With Elevated Blood Pressure, 2020, Hypertension
  • Validity of the Exercise Vital Sign Tool to Assess Physical Activity, 2021, American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • The impact of summer vacation on children's obesogenic behaviors and body mass index: a natural experiment, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
  • Losing sleep by staying up late leads adolescents to consume more carbohydrates and a higher glycemic load, 2021, SLEEP
  • Impact of a sweetened beverage tax on beverage prices in Seattle, WA, 2020, Economics & Human Biology

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors:

  • James F. Sallis
  • Lawrence D. Frank
  • Terry L. Conway
  • Kelli L. Cain
  • Stephen J. Mooney

Best Publications

  • Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures

    Brian E. Saelens;James F. Sallis;Lawrence D. Frank

  • Neighborhood-Based Differences in Physical Activity: An Environment Scale Evaluation

    Brian E. Saelens;James F. Sallis;Jennifer B. Black;Dungtsa Chen

  • Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ.

    Lawrence D. Frank;Thomas L. Schmid;James F. Sallis;James Chapman

  • Many Pathways from Land Use to Health: Associations between Neighborhood Walkability and Active Transportation, Body Mass Index, and Air Quality

    Lawrence D. Frank;James F. Sallis;Terry L. Conway;James E. Chapman

  • Healthy nutrition environments: concepts and measures.

    Karen Glanz;James F. Sallis;Brian E. Saelens;Lawrence D. Frank

  • Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease

    James F. Sallis;Myron F. Floyd;Daniel A. Rodríguez;Brian E. Saelens

  • The development of a walkability index: application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study

    Lawrence D Frank;James F Sallis;Brian E Saelens;Lauren Leary

  • Recommendations for Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity

    Bonnie A. Spear;Sarah E. Barlow;Chris Ervin;David S. Ludwig

  • Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale: Validity and Development of a Short Form

    Ester Cerin;Brian E. Saelens;James F. Sallis;Lawrence D. Frank

  • Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in stores (NEMS-S): development and evaluation.

    Karen Glanz;James F. Sallis;Brian E. Saelens;Lawrence D. Frank

  • Association of Park Size, Distance, and Features With Physical Activity in Neighborhood Parks

    Andrew T. Kaczynski;Luke R. Potwarka;Brian E. Saelens

  • Treatment of pediatric obesity.

    Leonard H. Epstein;Michelle D. Myers;Hollie A. Raynor;Brian E. Saelens

  • Active transportation and physical activity: opportunities for collaboration on transportation and public health research

    James F Sallis;Lawrence D Frank;Brian E Saelens;M.Katherine Kraft

  • Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?

    Lawrence Douglas Frank;Brian E. Saelens;Ken E. Powell;James E. Chapman

  • A Randomized Comparison of Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy for the Treatment of Overweight Individuals With Binge-Eating Disorder

    Denise E. Wilfley;R. Robinson Welch;Richard I. Stein;Emily Borman Spurrell

  • Neighborhood built environment and income: examining multiple health outcomes.

    James F. Sallis;Brian E. Saelens;Lawrence D. Frank;Terry L. Conway

  • Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults

    Neville Owen;Ester Cerin;Eva Leslie;Lorinne duToit

  • Active Commuting to School: Associations with Environment and Parental Concerns

    Jacqueline Kerr;Dori Rosenberg;James F Sallis;Brian E Saelens

  • Objective light-intensity physical activity associations with rated health in older adults.

    Matthew P. Buman;Eric B. Hekler;William L. Haskell;Leslie Pruitt

  • Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity in a Sample of Belgian Adults

    Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij;James F. Sallis;Brian E. Saelens

Frequent Co-Authors

James F. Sallis
James F. Sallis University of California, San Diego
Lawrence D. Frank
Lawrence D. Frank University of California, San Diego
Jacqueline Kerr
Jacqueline Kerr University of California, San Diego
Karen Glanz
Karen Glanz University of Pennsylvania
Leonard H. Epstein
Leonard H. Epstein University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Denise E. Wilfley
Denise E. Wilfley Washington University in St. Louis
Abby C. King
Abby C. King Stanford University
Anne Vernez Moudon
Anne Vernez Moudon University of Washington
Gregory J. Norman
Gregory J. Norman Dexcom (United States)
Kenneth B. Schechtman
Kenneth B. Schechtman Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA often leads students to explore flexible online nursing programs and accelerated career pathways. For registered nurses looking to advance, rn bsn online programs no clinicals offer a convenient way to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional clinical hours. This pathway is ideal for working professionals seeking to upskill while maintaining their current job.

Those aiming for leadership or specialized roles may consider a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP). Choosing the shortest msn to dnp program can save both time and tuition costs, allowing nurses to move quickly into high-demand positions. Alternatively, many dnp programs online are designed for accessibility, with streamlined coursework and flexible schedules tailored to busy practitioners.

If your goal is to start working in healthcare as soon as possible, you might ask, what is the fastest way to become an lpn? Fast-track LPN programs online can quickly prepare you for entry-level positions, providing a strong foundation before pursuing advanced degrees later. Each of these options demonstrates the growing opportunities and flexibility found in online nursing education.

Best Scientists Citing Brian E. Saelens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles