World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 74 19481 18280 1021 979 213 17231

Gerald Niedobitek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerald Niedobitek between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerald Niedobitek published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2025. 20 of the 243 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2025. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 19 publications
1988 2025

243 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerald Niedobitek: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 8
1990 8
1991 14
1992 9
1993 8
1994 6
1995 9
1996 6
1997 11
1998 1
1999 4
2000 7
2001 12
2002 6
2003 13
2004 11
2005 10
2006 14
2007 4
2008 2
2009 9
2010 1
2011 5
2012 4
2013 7
2014 2
2015 6
2016 0
2017 4
2018 2
2019 5
2020 1
2021 2
2022 0
2023 10
2024 1
2025 19
Total 243
Download as CSV

Gerald Niedobitek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Niedobitek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 213 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363 213
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerald Niedobitek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Niedobitek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 74
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gerald Niedobitek is affiliated with the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focused contribution in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, Surgery, Artificial Intelligence, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work encompasses several specific research topics, including:

  • Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Gerald Niedobitek include:

  • "Tumor-associated macrophages in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: hormetic relationship to outcome," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Human Lungs Show Limited Permissiveness for SARS-CoV-2 Due to Scarce ACE2 Levels But Strong Virus-Induced Immune Activation in Alveolar Macrophages," 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "S3-Leitlinie Analkarzinom," 2021, coloproctology
  • "Sind Mikroskope obsolet? Die digitale Zukunft der Pathologie," 2021, Der Pathologe
  • "Repeat full-thickness resection device use for recurrent duodenal adenoma: A case report," 2020, World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Gerald Niedobitek frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of their known frequent coauthors include:

  • David Horst
  • Uwe Schlichting
  • Laura Werner
  • Johannes H. Dreyer
  • David Hartmann

Their research has been published across various venues, with contributions to:

  • Scientific Reports
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • coloproctology
  • Der Pathologe
  • World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Best Publications

  • Macrophage Polarisation: an Immunohistochemical Approach for Identifying M1 and M2 Macrophages

    Mário Henrique M. Barros;Franziska Hauck;Johannes H. Dreyer;Bettina Kempkes

  • Demonstration of monoclonal EBV genomes in Hodgkin's disease and Ki-1-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma by combined Southern blot and in situ hybridization.

    Ioannis Anagnostopoulos;Hermann Herbst;Gerald Niedobitek;Harald Stein

  • Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein expression in Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells

    Hermann Herbst;Friederike Dallenbach;Michael Hummel;Gerald Niedobitek

  • Ber-EP4: new monoclonal antibody which distinguishes epithelia from mesothelial.

    U Latza;G Niedobitek;R Schwarting;H Nekarda

  • Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin's disease: transcriptional analysis of virus latency in the malignant cells.

    E M Deacon;G Pallesen;G Niedobitek;J Crocker

  • Follicular dendritic cells are a major reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in lymphoid tissues facilitating infection of CD4+ T-helper cells.

    H Spiegel;H Herbst;G Niedobitek;H D Foss

  • Differentiation-associated expression of the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 transactivator protein in oral hairy leukoplakia.

    L S Young;R Lau;M Rowe;G Niedobitek

  • High incidence of Epstein-Barr virus genomes in Hodgkin's disease.

    H. Herbst;G. Niedobitek;M. Kneba;M. Hummel

  • EPSTEIN–BARR VIRUS (EBV) INFECTION IN INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS: VIRUS LATENCY, REPLICATION AND PHENOTYPE OF EBV-INFECTED CELLS

    Gerald Niedobitek;Angelo Agathanggelou;Hermann Herbst;Lucie Whitehead

  • The Prognostic Significance of Bcl-2 and p53 Expression in Ovarian Carcinoma

    J. Jonathan O. Herod;Aristides G. Eliopoulos;Jane Warwick;Gerald Niedobitek

  • Epstein-Barr virus infection and replication in a human epithelial cell system.

    Q. X. Li;L. S. Young;G. Niedobitek;C. W. Dawson

  • Human Natural Killer Cells Prevent Infectious Mononucleosis Features by Targeting Lytic Epstein-Barr Virus Infection

    Obinna Chijioke;Anne Müller;Regina Feederle;Mario Henrique M. Barros

  • The Invasion Front of Human Colorectal Adenocarcinomas Shows Co-Localization of Nuclear β-Catenin, Cyclin D1, and p16INK4A and Is a Region of Low Proliferation

    Andreas Jung;Michael Schrauder;Ursula Oswald;Claudia Knoll

  • Epstein-Barr virus-infected T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic syndrome.

    H Kawaguchi;T Miyashita;H Herbst;G Niedobitek

  • Epstein‐Barr virus infection and human malignancies

    Gerald Niedobitek;Nadine Meru;Henri-Jacques Delecluse

  • The T cell triggering molecule Tp103 is associated with dipeptidyl aminopeptidase IV activity.

    M Hegen;G Niedobitek;C E Klein;H Stein

  • Frequent Expression of Interleukin-10 by Epstein-Barr Virus-Harboring Tumor Cells of Hodgkin's Disease

    Hermann Herbst;Hans-Dieter Foss;Jens Samol;Iguaracyra Araujo

  • Analysis of Epstein-Barr virus gene polymorphisms in normal donors and in virus-associated tumors from different geographic locations

    Farhat Khanim;Qing-Yun Yao;Gerald Niedobitek;Simritpal Sihota

  • Distribution of immune cells in head and neck cancer: CD8+ T-cells and CD20+ B-cells in metastatic lymph nodes are associated with favourable outcome in patients with oro- and hypopharyngeal carcinoma

    Dominik Pretscher;Luitpold V Distel;Gerhard G Grabenbauer;Michael Wittlinger

  • Patterns of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Non-Neoplastic Lymphoid Tissue

    Gerald Niedobitek;Hermann Herbst;Lawrence S. Young;Louise Brooks

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence S. Young
Lawrence S. Young University of Warwick
Elisabeth Kremmer
Elisabeth Kremmer Max Planck Society
Harald Stein
Harald Stein Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Alan B. Rickinson
Alan B. Rickinson University of Birmingham
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos
Ioannis Anagnostopoulos Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Friedrich A. Grässer
Friedrich A. Grässer Saarland University
Michael Hummel
Michael Hummel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
John M. Nicholls
John M. Nicholls University of Hong Kong
Henri Jacques Delecluse
Henri Jacques Delecluse Grenoble Alpes University
Andreas Jung
Andreas Jung University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering studying Medicine in the USA, you may also be interested in related online degrees and alternative healthcare career pathways. A popular choice for those interested in management is healthcare administration. For high-quality programs, look for which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure your degree is recognized by employers and meets rigorous standards.

Nursing remains a flexible and rewarding option, and many working nurses prefer accelerated online bridge programs. In particular, rn to bsn programs no clinicals can help registered nurses earn a bachelor's degree without additional clinical hours, making advancement more accessible.

For those seeking the highest level of nursing education, several online dnp programs allow you to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree more quickly. If flexibility and manageability are your priorities, look into the easiest dnp program online to find a path best suited to your lifestyle and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald Niedobitek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles