World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7089 6608 3829 3479 128 14887

Hillary Anger Elfenbein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hillary Anger Elfenbein between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hillary Anger Elfenbein published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2007. 6 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2007. 2002: 9 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hillary Anger Elfenbein: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 9
2003 8
2004 6
2005 5
2006 4
2007 13
2008 5
2009 7
2010 8
2011 2
2012 5
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 9
2017 8
2018 3
2019 6
2020 3
2021 5
2022 5
2023 5
2024 2
2025 4
Total 140
Download as CSV

Hillary Anger Elfenbein publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillary Anger Elfenbein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 128
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hillary Anger Elfenbein D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hillary Anger Elfenbein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 2007 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Hillary Anger Elfenbein is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and social sciences, with a considerable emphasis on sociology, political science, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

The research topics frequently explored by Elfenbein include conflict management and negotiation, job satisfaction and organizational behavior, language, discourse, and communication strategies, emotional intelligence and performance, emotion and mood recognition, interpreting and communication in healthcare, and gender diversity and inequality.

Elfenbein has contributed to various publication venues, with several works appearing in the Academy of Management Proceedings, SSRN Electronic Journal, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, PLoS ONE, and Emotion Review.

Some recent papers by Elfenbein and collaborators include:

  • Cross-Cultural Emotion Recognition and In-Group Advantage in Vocal Expression: A Meta-Analysis (2020) in Emotion Review
  • Emotion in Organizations: Theory and Research (2022) in Annual Review of Psychology
  • Effects of aging on emotion recognition from dynamic multimodal expressions and vocalizations (2021) in Scientific Reports
  • The (mostly) robust influence of initial trustworthiness beliefs on subsequent behaviors and perceptions (2021) in Human Relations
  • The Effects of Emotional Expressions in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis and Future Directions for Research (2020) in Human Performance

Elfenbein has frequently collaborated with other researchers, including Daisung Jang, Petri Laukka, William P. Bottom, Sudeep Sharma, and Ruchi Sinha.

The scientist has been recognized with distinctions such as being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2019 and receiving the Hellman Fellow award in 2007.

Best Publications

  • On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysis.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • Does it Pay to Be Good...And Does it Matter? A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance

    Joshua D. Margolis;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;James P. Walsh

  • 7 Emotion in Organizations: A Review and Theoretical Integration

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein

  • The Psychology of Rivalry: A Relationally Dependent Analysis of Competition

    Gavin J. Kilduff;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Barry M. Staw

  • What do people value when they negotiate? Mapping the domain of subjective value in negotiation.

    Jared R. Curhan;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Heng Xu

  • 7 Emotion in Organizations

    Unknown

  • When familiarity breeds accuracy: cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • Toward a dialect theory: cultural differences in the expression and recognition of posed facial expressions.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Martin Beaupré;Manon Lévesque;Ursula Hess

  • Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition?

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • Reading your Counterpart: The Benefit of Emotion Recognition Accuracy for Effectiveness in Negotiation

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Maw Der Foo;Maw Der Foo;Judith White;Hwee Hoon Tan

  • Universals and Cultural Differences in Recognizing Emotions

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • Too Many Cooks Spoil the Broth: How High-Status Individuals Decrease Group Effectiveness

    Boris Groysberg;Jeffrey T. Polzer;Hillary Anger Elfenbein

  • Nonverbal “Accents”: Cultural Differences in Facial Expressions of Emotion

    Abigail A. Marsh;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • Fitting In: The Effects of Relational Demography and Person-Culture Fit on Group Process and Performance

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Charles A. O'Reilly

  • Predicting workplace outcomes from the ability to eavesdrop on feelings.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Nalini Ambady

  • The many faces of emotional contagion An affective process theory of affective linkage

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein

  • EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEGOTIATION: THE TENSION BETWEEN CREATING AND CLAIMING VALUE

    Maw Der Foo;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Hwee Hoon Tan;Voon Chuan Aik

  • Do Well by Doing Good? Don't Count on It

    Joshua D. Margolis;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;James P. Walsh

  • Emotional intelligence and the recognition of emotion from facial expressions.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Abigail A. Marsh;Nalini Ambady

  • On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • Nonverbal Dialects and Accents in Facial Expressions of Emotion

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein

  • Mapping 24 emotions conveyed by brief human vocalization.

    Alan S. Cowen;Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Petri Laukka;Dacher Keltner

  • Cross-cultural patterns in emotion recognition: highlighting design and analytical techniques.

    Hillary Anger Elfenbein;Manas K. Mandal;Nalini Ambady;Susumu Harizuka

Frequent Co-Authors

Petri Laukka
Petri Laukka Uppsala University
Nalini Ambady
Nalini Ambady Stanford University
Maw Der Foo
Maw Der Foo Nanyang Technological University
Charles A. O'Reilly
Charles A. O'Reilly Stanford University
Abigail A. Marsh
Abigail A. Marsh Georgetown University
Emery Schubert
Emery Schubert University of New South Wales
Dacher Keltner
Dacher Keltner University of California, Berkeley
James P. Walsh
James P. Walsh University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Lucio Baccaro
Lucio Baccaro Max Planck Society
Gerben A. van Kleef
Gerben A. van Kleef University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of fulfilling careers, particularly in educational settings. One popular path is becoming a school counselor, a role that blends psychological knowledge with practical skills to support student success. The journey to this career, however, varies from state to state and requires careful planning—especially if you’re considering online degree options.

Each state has unique licensure and education criteria. For example, if you're interested in learning about the requirements to be a school counselor in Nevada, you'll find that state-mandated coursework and exams are essential. Similarly, the New Hampshire school counselor education requirements may include internships and state-specific testing.

Other regions, like the requirements to be a school counselor in New Jersey, also outline specific graduate coursework and clinical experience. In New Mexico, you can explore how to become a school counselor in New Mexico with its own set of licensure requirements. Understanding these differences is crucial as you plan your online psychology degree and future career in school counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Hillary Anger Elfenbein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles