World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marc D. Pell

Marc D. Pell

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
8306
World Ranking
5493
National Ranking
372

Marc D. Pell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Pell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 142 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Marc D. Pell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marc D. Pell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marc D. Pell is affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with specific engagement in areas such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Language and Linguistics.

The scientist's work covers several main topics including Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, Action Observation and Synchronization, Emotion and Mood Recognition, Reading and Literacy Development, and Stuttering Research and Treatment.

Marc D. Pell has published papers in a variety of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include Brain Research, Social Neuroscience, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Perspectives on Psychological Science, and Emotion Review.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Marc D. Pell include:

  • Comment: The Next Frontier: Prosody Research Gets Interpersonal (2021), Emotion Review
  • Immediate online use of prosody reveals the ironic intentions of a speaker: neurophysiological evidence (2021), Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • The Sound of Emotional Prosody: Nearly 3 Decades of Research and Future Directions (2024), Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance (2020), Brain Research
  • Listen to my feelings! How prosody and accent drive the empathic relevance of complaining speech (2022), Neuropsychologia

Marc D. Pell frequently collaborates with coauthors including Xiaoming Jiang, Maël Mauchand, Jonathan A. Caballero, Simon Rigoulot, and Haining Cui. These collaborations have resulted in multiple joint publications contributing to their fields of study.

Best Publications

  • The sound of sarcasm

    Henry S. Cheang;Marc D. Pell

  • Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages

    Marc D. Pell;Silke Paulmann;Silke Paulmann;Chinar Dara;Areej Alasseri

  • Recognizing emotions in a foreign language

    Marc D. Pell;Laura Monetta;Silke Paulmann;Sonja A. Kotz

  • The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging

    Shari R. Baum;Marc D. Pell

  • Processing emotional tone from speech in Parkinson’s disease: A role for the basal ganglia

    Marc D. Pell;Carol L. Leonard

  • Cerebral mechanisms for understanding emotional prosody in speech

    Marc D. Pell

  • How aging affects the recognition of emotional speech.

    Silke Paulmann;Marc D. Pell;Sonja A. Kotz

  • On the time course of vocal emotion recognition.

    Marc D. Pell;Sonja A. Kotz

  • Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions.

    Marc D. Pell

  • Irony comprehension and theory of mind deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease

    Laura Monetta;Laura Monetta;Christopher M. Grindrod;Marc D. Pell

  • The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain-damaged adults

    Marc D. Pell;Shari R. Baum

  • Preferential decoding of emotion from human non-linguistic vocalizations versus speech prosody

    M D Pell;K Rothermich;P Liu;Silke Paulmann

  • Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson's disease.

    Laura Monetta;Marc D. Pell

  • Is there an advantage for recognizing multi-modal emotional stimuli?

    Silke Paulmann;Marc D. Pell

  • Vocal emotion processing in Parkinson's disease: reduced sensitivity to negative emotions.

    Chinar Dara;Laura Monetta;Marc D. Pell

  • The impact of Parkinson’s disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners

    Marc D. Pell;Henry S. Cheang;Carol L. Leonard

  • Recognition of prosody following unilateral brain lesion: influence of functional and structural attributes of prosodic contours.

    Marc D Pell

  • Facial expression decoding in early Parkinson's disease

    Marc D. Pell;Carol L. Leonard

  • The effects of oxytocin on social cognition and behaviour in frontotemporal dementia

    Sarah Jesso;Darlyne Morlog;Sarah Ross;Marc D. Pell

  • The sound of confidence and doubt

    Xiaoming Jiang;Marc D. Pell

  • Unilateral Brain Damage, Prosodic Comprehension Deficits, and the Acoustic Cues to Prosody ☆ ☆☆

    Marc D. Pell;Shari R. Baum

Frequent Co-Authors

Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University
Silke Paulmann
Silke Paulmann University of Essex
Shari R. Baum
Shari R. Baum McGill University
Johannes Schwarz
Johannes Schwarz Leipzig University
Hellmuth Obrig
Hellmuth Obrig Max Planck Society
Andrew Kertesz
Andrew Kertesz University of Western Ontario
Debra Titone
Debra Titone McGill University
Derek G.V. Mitchell
Derek G.V. Mitchell University of Western Ontario
Jorge L. Armony
Jorge L. Armony McGill University
Skye McDonald
Skye McDonald University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a range of online degrees and diverse career pathways. Many students explore counseling, mental health services, or educational roles. Online psychology programs can provide the flexibility to study while gaining relevant volunteer or work experience.

If you’re considering a career as a school counselor, it’s important to research the certification criteria in your state. For example, North Carolina school counselor education requirements emphasize both academics and practicum experience. Similarly, if you want to practice in the Midwest, you’ll want to look into the how to become a school counselor in North Dakota process for detailed guidance.

Requirements also vary across states like Ohio and Oklahoma. The requirements to be a school counselor in Ohio can differ significantly from the how to become a school counselor in Oklahoma pathway. Be sure to review your chosen state’s rules carefully before selecting an online degree to ensure you meet both educational and licensing objectives.

Best Scientists Citing Marc D. Pell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles