World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Shari R. Baum

Shari R. Baum

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
44
Citations
6328
World Ranking
7046
National Ranking
477

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6578
World Ranking
6983
National Ranking
411

Shari R. Baum publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shari R. Baum sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 161 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Shari R. Baum D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shari R. Baum sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shari R. Baum is affiliated with McGill University in Canada and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, artificial intelligence, and language and linguistics.

The research topics addressed by Baum focus on language and brain function, particularly in relation to bilingualism, sensory perception, and phonetics. Core topics of their work include:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Reading and Literacy Development

Baum frequently publishes in notable venues such as:

  • Applied Psycholinguistics
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Brain and Language
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Baum's academic output, with frequent co-authors including Shanna Kousaie, Annie C. Gilbert, Natalie A. Phillips, Debra Titone, and Denise Klein.

Recent significant publications include:

  • "Bilingual language experience as a multidimensional spectrum: Associations with objective and subjective language proficiency," 2020, Applied Psycholinguistics
  • "Interhemispheric functional brain connectivity predicts new language learning success in adults," 2022, Cerebral Cortex
  • "Effects of aging and noncanonical form presentation on idiom processing: Evidence from eye tracking," 2020, Applied Psycholinguistics
  • "Earlier age of second language learning induces more robust speech encoding in the auditory brainstem in adults, independent of amount of language exposure during early childhood," 2020, Brain and Language
  • "Exploring individual differences in native phonetic perception and their link to nonnative phonetic perception," 2024, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Best Publications

  • The neural bases of prosody: Insights from lesion studies and neuroimaging

    Shari R. Baum;Marc D. Pell

  • Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words

    Ekaterini Klepousniotou;Shari R. Baum

  • Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging

    Shari Baum;Debra Titone

  • Musical Melody and Speech Intonation: Singing a Different Tune?

    Robert J Zatorre;Shari R Baum

  • On the role of the supramarginal gyrus in phonological processing and verbal working memory: evidence from rTMS studies.

    Isabelle Deschamps;Shari R. Baum;Vincent L. Gracco

  • Perceptual recalibration of speech sounds following speech motor learning

    Douglas M. Shiller;Marc Sato;Vincent L. Gracco;Shari R. Baum

  • Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks

    Jason W. Gullifer;Jason W. Gullifer;Xiaoqian J. Chai;Veronica Whitford;Irina Pivneva

  • Production of Coronal Stops by Simultaneous Bilingual Adults.

    Megha Sundara;Linda Polka;Shari Baum

  • Temporal dimensions of consonant and vowel production: an acoustic and CT scan analysis of aphasic speech.

    Shari R Baum;Sheila E Blumstein;Sheila E Blumstein;Margaret A Naeser;Margaret A Naeser;Carole L Palumbo;Carole L Palumbo

  • The ability to perceive and comprehend intonation in linguistic and affective contexts by brain-damaged adults

    Marc D. Pell;Shari R. Baum

  • Unilateral Brain Damage, Prosodic Comprehension Deficits, and the Acoustic Cues to Prosody ☆ ☆☆

    Marc D. Pell;Shari R. Baum

  • Reading Difficulties in Adult Deaf Readers of French: Phonological Codes, Not Guilty!

    Nathalie N. Bélanger;Shari R. Baum;Rachel I. Mayberry

  • Speech compensation to structural modifications of the oral cavity

    David H. McFarland;Shari R. Baum;Caroline Chabot

  • Incomplete compensation to articulatory perturbation

    David H. McFarland;Shari R. Baum

  • Sensorimotor integration for speech motor learning involves the inferior parietal cortex.

    Mamie Shum;Douglas M. Shiller;Shari R. Baum;Vincent L. Gracco;Vincent L. Gracco

  • The development of speech adaptation to an artificial palate

    Shari R. Baum;David H. McFarland

  • Acoustic analyses and perceptual data on anticipatory labial coarticulation in adults and children

    Joan A. Sereno;Shari R. Baum;G. Cameron Marean;Philip Lieberman

  • Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.

    Fatemeh Mollaei;Douglas M. Shiller;Shari R. Baum;Vincent L. Gracco

  • Preliminary observations on the use of duration as a cue to syllable‐initial fricative consonant voicing in English

    Shari R. Baum;Sheila E. Blumstein

  • The role of the left inferior parietal lobule in second language learning: An intensive language training fMRI study

    Elise B. Barbeau;Elise B. Barbeau;Xiaoqian J. Chai;Xiaoqian J. Chai;Jen Kai Chen;Jen Kai Chen;Jennika Soles

  • Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken english garden path sentences: Erp evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis

    Efrat Pauker;Inbal Itzhak;Shari R. Baum;Karsten Steinhauer

  • Production of affective and linguistic prosody by brain-damaged patients

    Shari R. Baum;Marc D. Pell

  • The neural underpinnings of semantic ambiguity and anaphora.

    Veena D. Dwivedi;Natalie A. Phillips;Stephanie Einagel;Shari R. Baum

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent L. Gracco
Vincent L. Gracco McGill University
Debra Titone
Debra Titone McGill University
Natalie A. Phillips
Natalie A. Phillips Concordia University
Marc D. Pell
Marc D. Pell McGill University
Linda Polka
Linda Polka McGill University
Kate E. Watkins
Kate E. Watkins University of Oxford
Lola L. Cuddy
Lola L. Cuddy Queen's University
Kevin G. Munhall
Kevin G. Munhall Queen's University
Sheila E. Blumstein
Sheila E. Blumstein Brown University
Robert J. Zatorre
Robert J. Zatorre McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of rewarding career options and academic pathways. Students often compare this field with some of the best majors in college to maximize future earning potential and align with their interests.

For those seeking flexibility, online degrees in neuroscience and related fields are increasingly popular. Affordability is a huge concern, and it's helpful to look for online colleges that offer financial aid to minimize student debt while still pursuing a quality education.

Interested in specific skillsets? Earning online certifications can boost your career and open new roles, especially in tech, research, or health sectors. If you prefer a more streamlined educational path, you may want to research the easiest online degree options that still connect to neuroscience and allied sciences.

No matter your goals, there are a variety of accessible and practical pathways to start or advance your career in neuroscience, both online and on campus.

Best Scientists Citing Shari R. Baum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles