World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
61
Citations
13015
World Ranking
3684
National Ranking
1691

Jackson T. Gandour publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jackson T. Gandour sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 218 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jackson T. Gandour D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jackson T. Gandour sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jackson T. Gandour is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within neuroscience and psychology, focusing particularly on cognitive and experimental aspects of brain function.

The primary fields of study for Gandour include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broader fields, Gandour's work concentrates on subfields such as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Their research topics reflect interests in sensory processing and rehabilitation:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Jackson T. Gandour has contributed to scholarly literature, including recent publications with a focus on auditory and cognitive processing. A notable paper is:

  • "Cortical hemisphere preference and brainstem ear asymmetry reflect experience-dependent functional modulation of pitch," published in 2021 in the journal Brain and Language

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Gandour include:

  • Ananthanarayan Krishnan
  • Chandan H. Suresh

Gandour's work has appeared in publication venues such as:

  • Brain and Language

Best Publications

  • Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Yisheng Xu;Jackson Gandour;Peter Cariani

  • Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies

    Robert J Zatorre;Jackson T Gandour

  • Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Effects of language experience and stimulus complexity on the categorical perception of pitch direction

    Yisheng Xu;Jackson T. Gandour;Alexander L. Francis

  • A Crosslinguistic PET Study of Tone Perception

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Li Hsieh;Bret Weinzapfel

  • Hemispheric roles in the perception of speech prosody.

    Jackson T. Gandour;Yunxia Tong;Donald Wong;Thomas M. Talavage

  • Functional Heterogeneity of Inferior Frontal Gyrus Is Shaped by Linguistic Experience

    Li Hsieh;Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Gary D. Hutchins

  • Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Human frequency-following response: representation of pitch contours in Chinese tones.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Yisheng Xu;Jackson T. Gandour;Peter A. Cariani

  • Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Jackson T. Gandour;Ananthanarayan Krishnan

  • Temporal integration of speech prosody is shaped by language experience: an fMRI study.

    Jack Gandour;Mario Dzemidzic;Donald Wong;Mark Lowe

  • Mismatch negativity to pitch contours is influenced by language experience.

    Bharath Chandrasekaran;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Phonetics and Phonology

    Jackson T. Gandour

  • The role of the auditory brainstem in processing linguistically-relevant pitch patterns

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • The effects of tone language experience on pitch processing in the brainstem

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman

  • Perception and production of tone in aphasia.

    Jack Gandour;Soranee Holasuit Petty;Rochana Dardarananda

  • A Cross-Linguistic fMRI Study of Spectral and Temporal Cues Underlying Phonological Processing

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Mark Lowe;Mario Dzemidzic

  • Experience-dependent enhancement of linguistic pitch representation in the brainstem is not specific to a speech context

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jayaganesh Swaminathan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Enhanced brainstem encoding predicts musicians’ perceptual advantages with pitch

    Gavin M. Bidelman;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Processing dependencies between segmental and suprasegmental features in Mandarin Chinese

    Yunxia Tong;Alexander L. Francis;Jackson T. Gandour

  • Experience-dependent neural representation of dynamic pitch in the brainstem.

    Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour;Gavin M. Bidelman;Jayaganesh Swaminathan

  • A cross‐linguistic fMRI study of perception of intonation and emotion in Chinese

    Jack Gandour;Donald Wong;Mario Dzemidzic;Mark Lowe

  • Specificity of experience-dependent pitch representation in the brainstem.

    Yisheng Xu;Ananthanarayan Krishnan;Jackson T. Gandour

Frequent Co-Authors

Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Ananthanarayan Krishnan Purdue University West Lafayette
Gavin M. Bidelman
Gavin M. Bidelman Indiana University
Mario Dzemidzic
Mario Dzemidzic Indiana University
Bharath Chandrasekaran
Bharath Chandrasekaran University of Pittsburgh
Robert J. Zatorre
Robert J. Zatorre McGill University
Yi Xu
Yi Xu University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in neuroscience? Exploring best majors in college can help you identify fields that offer strong earning potential and relevance to neuroscience careers. Majors such as biology, psychology, and biomedical engineering often serve as useful foundations for this dynamic discipline.

For those seeking flexibility, fafsa-approved online certificate programs make neuroscience education more accessible and affordable. These accredited options are especially valuable if you're balancing work or other commitments while aiming to enhance your expertise.

If you're looking to boost your credentials quickly, online certificates can open doors to new professional opportunities, including health tech, research, or data analysis roles. These certifications are designed to meet workforce demands and can serve as stepping stones into specialized positions.

Lastly, those prioritizing a manageable workload might research the easiest online degree options related to neuroscience. These degrees can provide a streamlined path toward foundational knowledge and entry-level jobs, helping you get started in the field while maintaining a balanced schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Jackson T. Gandour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles