World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
70
Citations
14610
World Ranking
2553
National Ranking
59

Martin Meyer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Meyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 220 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin Meyer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Meyer is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, developmental and educational psychology, sensory systems, and neurology.

The primary focus of Meyer's work involves key topics such as hearing loss and rehabilitation, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, hearing, cochlea, tinnitus, genetics, neuroscience and music perception, vestibular and auditory disorders, multisensory perception and integration, and language development and disorders.

The scientist has published in various notable venues, with frequent appearances in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), the Journal of Neurolinguistics, Progress in Brain Research, Frontiers in Neuroscience, and Brain and Language.

Recent peer-reviewed publications by Martin Meyer include:

  • "Better speech-in-noise comprehension is associated with enhanced neural speech tracking in older adults with hearing impairment" (2022, Cortex)
  • "Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning" (2021, PLoS Biology)
  • "Lower glutamate and GABA levels in auditory cortex of tinnitus patients: a 2D-JPRESS MR spectroscopy study" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "On the relationship between tinnitus distress, cognitive performance and aging" (2021, Progress in Brain Research)
  • "Working memory and not acoustic sensitivity is related to stress processing ability in a foreign language: An ERP study" (2020, Journal of Neurolinguistics)

Collaboration has been a notable aspect of Meyer's scientific contributions, with frequent co-authors including Nathalie Giroud, Tobias Kleinjung, Sebastian Sauppe, Patrick Neff, and Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky.

Best Publications

  • Auditory language comprehension: an event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information.

    Angela D. Friederici;Martin Meyer;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms

    Martin S. Meyer

  • Endothelial-Vasoprotective Effects of High-Density Lipoprotein Are Impaired in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus but Are Improved After Extended-Release Niacin Therapy

    Sajoscha A. Sorrentino;Christian Besler;Lucia Rohrer;Martin Meyer

  • FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences.

    Martin Meyer;Kai Alter;Angela D. Friederici;Gabriele Lohmann

  • Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university

    Arianna Martinelli;Martin S. Meyer;Martin S. Meyer;Nick Von Tunzelmann

  • On the lateralization of emotional prosody: an event-related functional MR investigation.

    Sonja A Kotz;Martin Meyer;Kai Alter;Mireille Besson

  • White matter plasticity in the corticospinal tract of musicians: a diffusion tensor imaging study.

    Adrian Imfeld;Mathias S. Oechslin;Martin Meyer;Thomas Loenneker;Thomas Loenneker

  • A network for audio–motor coordination in skilled pianists and non-musicians

    Simon Baumann;Susan Koeneke;Conny F. Schmidt;Martin Meyer

  • Visual activation of auditory cortex reflects maladaptive plasticity in cochlear implant users

    Pascale Sandmann;Norbert Dillier;Tom Eichele;Tom Eichele;Martin Meyer

  • Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands

    Martin Meyer;Angela D. Friederici;D. Yves von Cramon

  • Brain activity varies with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody

    Martin Meyer;Karsten Steinhauer;Karsten Steinhauer;Kai Alter;Angela D. Friederici

  • Voice perception: Sex, pitch, and the right hemisphere

    Sonja Lattner;Martin E. Meyer;Angela D. Friederici

  • Editorial: Towards an Understanding of Tinnitus Heterogeneity.

    Christopher R. Cederroth;Silvano Gallus;Deborah A. Hall;Tobias Kleinjung

  • Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses

    Angela D Friederici;Karsten Steinhauer;Axel Mecklinger;Martin Meyer

  • FMRI in patients with motor conversion symptoms and controls with simulated weakness.

    Jon Stone;Adam Zeman;Enrico Simonotto;Martin Meyer

  • The functional anatomy of inspection time: an event-related fMRI study.

    Ian J. Deary;Enrico Simonotto;Martin Meyer;Alan Marshall

  • Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.

    Tino Zaehle;T Wüstenberg;T Wüstenberg;Martin Meyer;Lutz Jäncke

  • The plasticity of the superior longitudinal fasciculus as a function of musical expertise: a diffusion tensor imaging study

    Mathias S Oechslin;Adrian Imfeld;Thomas Loenneker;Thomas Loenneker;Martin Meyer

  • Origin and emergence of entrepreneurship as a research field

    M. Meyer;D. Libaers;B. Thijs;K. Grant

  • Sequential effects of propofol on functional brain activation induced by auditory language processing: an event‐related functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    Wolfgang Heinke;Christian J. Fiebach;Christian Schwarzbauer;Martin Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Tino Zaehle
Tino Zaehle Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Kai Alter
Kai Alter Newcastle University
D. Yves von Cramon
D. Yves von Cramon Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Jürgen Hänggi
Jürgen Hänggi University of Zurich
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg
Erik C. Böttger
Erik C. Böttger University of Zurich
Winfried Schlee
Winfried Schlee University of Regensburg
Axel Mecklinger
Axel Mecklinger Saarland University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Martin Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles