World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7870 7264 660 627 138 6591

Tino Zaehle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tino Zaehle between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tino Zaehle published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 7 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 2 publications
2003 2026

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tino Zaehle: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 3
2011 4
2012 4
2013 5
2014 6
2015 14
2016 14
2017 10
2018 9
2019 10
2020 11
2021 16
2022 7
2023 9
2024 11
2025 5
2026 2
Total 154
Download as CSV

Tino Zaehle publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tino Zaehle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 138–147 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 138 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456 138
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Tino Zaehle D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tino Zaehle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Tino Zaehle is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany and has focused their research primarily within the field of neuroscience. Their body of work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research covers a variety of topics related to brain function and modulation, concentrating on:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Tino Zaehle has contributed frequently to several scientific journals. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Progress in Brain Research

Recent published papers by Zaehle and collaborators demonstrate contributions to various research domains and methods. These include:

  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020), 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD, 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • The role of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus in human memory processing, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Current challenges in reliably targeting the noradrenergic locus coeruleus using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), 2021, Autonomic Neuroscience
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the auditory cortex modulates GABA and glutamate: a 7 T MR-spectroscopy study, 2020, Scientific Reports

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Zaehle include:

  • Aiden Haghikia
  • Stefanie Linnhoff
  • Katharina S. Rufener
  • Kerstin Krauel
  • Philipp Ruhnau

Best Publications

  • Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG.

    Tino Zaehle;Stefan Rach;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

    Tino Zaehle;Tino Zaehle;Pascale Sandmann;Jeremy D Thorne;Lutz Jäncke

  • Functional anatomy of pitch memory--an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.

    Nadine Gaab;Christian Gaser;Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke

  • The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference.

    Tino Zaehle;Kirsten Jordan;Torsten Wüstenberg;Jürgen Baudewig

  • Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS

    Toralf Neuling;Sven Wagner;Carsten Hermann Wolters;Tino Zaehle;Tino Zaehle

  • Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.

    Tino Zaehle;T Wüstenberg;T Wüstenberg;Martin Meyer;Lutz Jäncke

  • The Neural Correlate of Speech Rhythm as Evidenced by Metrical Speech Processing

    Eveline Geiser;Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke;Martin Meyer

  • Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence

    Tino Zaehle;Manuela Beretta;Lutz Jäncke;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

    Carolin Breitling;Tino Zaehle;Moritz Dannhauer;Björn Bonath

  • Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream

    Tino Zaehle;Eveline Geiser;Kai Alter;Lutz Jancke

  • Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation

    Catherine M Sweeney-Reed;Tino Zaehle;Juergen Voges;Juergen Voges;Friedhelm C Schmitt

  • Auditory event-related response in visual cortex modulates subsequent visual responses in humans.

    Nicole Naue;Stefan Rach;Daniel Strüber;Rene J. Huster

  • Resonance phenomena in the human auditory cortex: individual resonance frequencies of the cerebral cortex determine electrophysiological responses

    T. Zaehle;D. Lenz;F. W. Ohl;F. W. Ohl;C. S. Herrmann

  • No modulation of pupil size and event-related pupil response by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)

    Marius Keute;Mustafa Demirezen;Alina Graf;Notger G. Mueller;Notger G. Mueller

  • Effects of long-term potentiation in the human visual cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Wesley C. Clapp;Tino Zaehle;Kai Lutz;Val L. Marcar

  • Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

    Conny F. Schmidt;Conny F. Schmidt;Tino Zaehle;Martin Meyer;Eveline Geiser

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) traces the predominance of the left auditory cortex for processing of rapidly changing acoustic information.

    K. Heimrath;M. Kuehne;H.-J. Heinze;T. Zaehle

  • Spectro-temporal processing during speech perception involves left posterior auditory cortex.

    Martin Meyer;Tino Zaehle;Viktoria-Eleni Gountouna;Anthony Barron

  • Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: An Objective Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

    Stefanie Linnhoff;Marina Fiene;Hans-Jochen Heinze;Tino Zaehle

  • Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features.

    Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke;Martin Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Hermann Hinrichs
Hermann Hinrichs Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer University of Zurich
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Alan Richardson-Klavehn Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Michael D. Rugg
Michael D. Rugg The University of Texas at Dallas
Jörn Kaufmann
Jörn Kaufmann Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and career options. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing graduate programs in mental health, counseling, or psychology—fields that closely connect to neuroscience concepts.

For example, students seeking a direct path to licensure and clinical practice can explore cacrep-accredited programs online. These programs offer specialized training and preparation for becoming professional counselors. Alternatively, those interested in flexible graduate education may consider online masters counseling programs, which enable students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

Another growing area is marriage and family therapy. Through marriage and family therapy master's programs, students can develop the skills to support individuals, couples, and families in managing relationships and mental health. Additionally, those interested in research, education, or advanced therapeutic roles might pursue online psychology masters degrees, which provide a strong foundation in psychological theory and practice.

These online pathways are valuable options for neuroscience graduates looking to broaden their career opportunities in the behavioral, mental health, and psychological sciences fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tino Zaehle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles