World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6591
World Ranking
7870
National Ranking
660

Tino Zaehle publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tino Zaehle sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 138 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Tino Zaehle D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tino Zaehle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tino Zaehle is affiliated with Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg in Germany and has focused their research primarily within the field of neuroscience. Their body of work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research covers a variety of topics related to brain function and modulation, concentrating on:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering

Tino Zaehle has contributed frequently to several scientific journals. Notable venues with multiple publications include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Progress in Brain Research

Recent published papers by Zaehle and collaborators demonstrate contributions to various research domains and methods. These include:

  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020), 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Comparison between conventional and HD-tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus in children and adolescents with ADHD, 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • The role of the anterior nuclei of the thalamus in human memory processing, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Current challenges in reliably targeting the noradrenergic locus coeruleus using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), 2021, Autonomic Neuroscience
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the auditory cortex modulates GABA and glutamate: a 7 T MR-spectroscopy study, 2020, Scientific Reports

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Zaehle include:

  • Aiden Haghikia
  • Stefanie Linnhoff
  • Katharina S. Rufener
  • Kerstin Krauel
  • Philipp Ruhnau

Best Publications

  • Transcranial alternating current stimulation enhances individual alpha activity in human EEG.

    Tino Zaehle;Stefan Rach;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates working memory performance: combined behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.

    Tino Zaehle;Tino Zaehle;Pascale Sandmann;Jeremy D Thorne;Lutz Jäncke

  • Functional anatomy of pitch memory--an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.

    Nadine Gaab;Christian Gaser;Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke

  • The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference.

    Tino Zaehle;Kirsten Jordan;Torsten Wüstenberg;Jürgen Baudewig

  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020).

    Adam D. Farmer;Adam Strzelczyk;Alessandra Finisguerra;Alexander V. Gourine

  • Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS

    Toralf Neuling;Sven Wagner;Carsten Hermann Wolters;Tino Zaehle;Tino Zaehle

  • Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.

    Tino Zaehle;T Wüstenberg;T Wüstenberg;Martin Meyer;Lutz Jäncke

  • The Neural Correlate of Speech Rhythm as Evidenced by Metrical Speech Processing

    Eveline Geiser;Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke;Martin Meyer

  • Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence

    Tino Zaehle;Manuela Beretta;Lutz Jäncke;Christoph S. Herrmann

  • Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).

    Carolin Breitling;Tino Zaehle;Moritz Dannhauer;Björn Bonath

  • Segmental processing in the human auditory dorsal stream

    Tino Zaehle;Eveline Geiser;Kai Alter;Lutz Jancke

  • Corticothalamic phase synchrony and cross-frequency coupling predict human memory formation

    Catherine M Sweeney-Reed;Tino Zaehle;Juergen Voges;Juergen Voges;Friedhelm C Schmitt

  • Auditory event-related response in visual cortex modulates subsequent visual responses in humans.

    Nicole Naue;Stefan Rach;Daniel Strüber;Rene J. Huster

  • Resonance phenomena in the human auditory cortex: individual resonance frequencies of the cerebral cortex determine electrophysiological responses

    T. Zaehle;D. Lenz;F. W. Ohl;F. W. Ohl;C. S. Herrmann

  • No modulation of pupil size and event-related pupil response by transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS)

    Marius Keute;Mustafa Demirezen;Alina Graf;Notger G. Mueller;Notger G. Mueller

  • Effects of long-term potentiation in the human visual cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

    Wesley C. Clapp;Tino Zaehle;Kai Lutz;Val L. Marcar

  • Silent and continuous fMRI scanning differentially modulate activation in an auditory language comprehension task.

    Conny F. Schmidt;Conny F. Schmidt;Tino Zaehle;Martin Meyer;Eveline Geiser

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) traces the predominance of the left auditory cortex for processing of rapidly changing acoustic information.

    K. Heimrath;M. Kuehne;H.-J. Heinze;T. Zaehle

  • Spectro-temporal processing during speech perception involves left posterior auditory cortex.

    Martin Meyer;Tino Zaehle;Viktoria-Eleni Gountouna;Anthony Barron

  • Cognitive Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis: An Objective Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment by Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

    Stefanie Linnhoff;Marina Fiene;Hans-Jochen Heinze;Tino Zaehle

  • Electrical brain imaging evidences left auditory cortex involvement in speech and non-speech discrimination based on temporal features.

    Tino Zaehle;Lutz Jancke;Martin Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans-Jochen Heinze
Hans-Jochen Heinze Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Hermann Hinrichs
Hermann Hinrichs Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Martin Meyer
Martin Meyer University of Zurich
Raymond J. Dolan
Raymond J. Dolan University College London
Christoph Herrmann
Christoph Herrmann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Alan Richardson-Klavehn Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Robert T. Knight
Robert T. Knight University of California, Berkeley
Michael D. Rugg
Michael D. Rugg The University of Texas at Dallas
Jörn Kaufmann
Jörn Kaufmann Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a wide array of related online degrees and career options. Many students expand their expertise by pursuing graduate programs in mental health, counseling, or psychology—fields that closely connect to neuroscience concepts.

For example, students seeking a direct path to licensure and clinical practice can explore cacrep-accredited programs online. These programs offer specialized training and preparation for becoming professional counselors. Alternatively, those interested in flexible graduate education may consider online masters counseling programs, which enable students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

Another growing area is marriage and family therapy. Through marriage and family therapy master's programs, students can develop the skills to support individuals, couples, and families in managing relationships and mental health. Additionally, those interested in research, education, or advanced therapeutic roles might pursue online psychology masters degrees, which provide a strong foundation in psychological theory and practice.

These online pathways are valuable options for neuroscience graduates looking to broaden their career opportunities in the behavioral, mental health, and psychological sciences fields.

Best Scientists Citing Tino Zaehle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles